|
Audio Letter
#7
Hello, everybody, this is Dr. Beter. Today is December 21, 1975, and
this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER® No. 7. As I celebrate Christmas
with my family a few days from now, I will be thanking God for the
precious gift He has given to all of us this year—the gift of time;
because, my friend, the year 1975, even as difficult and trying as
it has been, was a year of reprieve due to delays in the timetable
of the Four Rockefeller Brothers. At this very moment, some
important parts of their plan are as much as one year behind
schedule; and in the meantime, more and more Americans have been
awakening to the truth of what is going on. Yes, we have been
granted a little more time than we might have had to respond to the
menace we all face, but we dare not relax and waste whatever time we
have left. The Four Rockefeller Brothers are working feverishly to
make up for lost time.
Overseas, the way is being paved for war, including that nightmare
the world has feared for 30 years—NUCLEAR WAR. Here at home, our
economic woes are getting worse while a corrupt government,
controlled by the Rockefeller Brothers, tells us ‘Prosperity is just
around the corner.’
Preparations for the dictatorial new Rockefeller Constitution keep
marching on; and the man who has conspired for 20 years to become
our first Dictator, Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller, stands poised at the
threshold ready to seize the presidency. That is why it is so
important that more and more alert Americans are now asking just one
question: “What can I do?”
I am convinced that now, at last, there are enough of us to launch a
successful rescue of our great, free Republic. Therefore I have just
unveiled a strategy for action which I truly believe can and will
save our country. It is a strategy which you, as an individual, can
undertake starting right where you are. It uses the powers you are
granted by the most basic law of the land—our present United States
CONSTITUTION; and if you will faithfully do your part, you can rest
assured others all over America will be doing theirs too. The
result, IF WE WILL EACH DO OUR OWN PART, is a plan of action which,
in my opinion, cannot be stopped. This entire plan of action is
presented in a new AUDIO BOOK recorded December 15, 1975, and it’s
entitled:
“WHAT WE CAN DO TO SAVE AMERICA”,
and it is my answer to the question, “What can I do?”
The challenge before us, my friend, is
to regain control of the government that belongs to us, and we must
act quickly before that control, which is already in the hands of
the Rockefeller Brothers, slips forever beyond our reach.
CONTROL—that is the word, more than any other, that sums up the
actions of the Four Rockefeller Brothers. Control is both the end
toward which they work and the means by which they extend their
reach still further—control of money and of government, control of
industry and of Big Labor, control of natural resources and of human
resources.
The incredible financial wealth of the Rockefellers is actually
nothing more than a result of this insatiable drive for control; and
it grows continuously due to their control over your money, your
resources, your labor, and your government. They believe they have a
right to do all these things because they are convinced that they
have been divinely ordained to rule the world. So, for example,
using the CIA for their own private purposes is right and proper,
according to their concept of themselves as America’s royal family.
It matters not what you and I think, only they know best. All of
this and much more is made clear in the book that was written for
them as their Mein Kampf in 1930, “THE AMERICAN RICH” by Hoffman
Nickerson. Today I want to discuss three topics that point out some
of the fruits of such control by the Rockefeller Brothers:
-
Topic #1 - HOW
POLITICAL CONTROL PRODUCES COVER-UPS AND PARALYSIS, INSTEAD OF
TRUTH AND ACTION.
-
Topic #2 - HOW ECONOMIC
CONTROL PRODUCES DEEPENING ARTIFICIAL DEPRESSION AND MONETARY
CHAOS, INSTEAD OF REAL PROSPERITY
-
Topic #3 - HOW THE
ALLIANCE BETWEEN ROCKEFELLER CORPORATE SOCIALISM AND SOVIET
STATE SOCIALISM IS TAKING US INTO NUCLEAR WAR.
Topic #1
- In their drive for control, the
Rockefellers are trying to snare us all in their giant trap, catch
us so that we cannot wrestle free or fight back; but they know that
if they move too quickly we may notice what they are up to, and
react to protect ourselves. So they have been moving with great
patience and determination over a period of several decades to get
their trap assembled and in place ready to spring it on all of us.
To understand what is really happening, therefore, you should do as
they do: look at long spans of time, compress them in your mind, and
see where things are really headed.
Gradualism is the tactic now being used—while TV, Sports, and other
distractions are being used to focus people’s attention away from
what is really happening. Thus, even while many people find the idea
of a new Constitution for America preposterous, many of its
provisions are already being put in place, ready for ratification by
a National Referendum in the near future. The federal government
already regards the United States as divided up into 10 REGIONS, the
forerunners of the 10 so-called “New States.” The Federal Election
Commission, along with some other activities, is the forerunner of
the Electoral branch, and so on. So keep your eye on their
objective—that is, the direction in which they are moving events, so
that you won’t be fooled by their shifts in timing to meet their
various contingency plans.
The secret new Constitution, which was developed over a 10-year
period to fit the outline laid down personally by Nelson Rockefeller
himself, just as he did our present 25th Amendment—this secret new
Constitution is coming sooner or later, unless we stop it once and
for all! As former Senator Sam Ervin said so emphatically just a few
days ago, and I quote:
“We don’t need a new Constitution.
Ours has weathered many storms in the past 200 years. It was
written to last for the ages.”
But, my friend, if we leave the
Rockefeller machine in control of our government, our communications
media, and our economy, we will have a dictatorial new Constitution!
Senator Ervin is quoted as saying something else too, and it is
supremely ironic. Concerning Richard Nixon he said, quote:
“He had the most pronounced,
aggravated notion about the powers of the presidency. He
envisioned the President as being something of an absolute
monarch.”
However well these words may have
applied to Nixon, they apply far better to the man who made, used,
and then unmade Nixon—that is, Nelson Rockefeller.
Perhaps Senator Ervin himself now realizes how cleverly he was used
in the Watergate coup d’etat, since he said last spring, and I
quote:
“If I had known then what I know
now, I would never have voted to confirm Nelson Rockefeller.”
Whenever possible the Rockefeller
Brothers maneuver people into doing what they want done without
their puppets even being aware of it—not, at least, until later. But
the Rockefeller style also includes more solid avenues of control
over all sides, if possible, in every arena including that of
politics. Thus, for example, the Rockefellers have their hooks
equally deep into both the Democratic and Republican Parties as well
as fringe political fronts, both left and right. And while they have
often found it advantageous to maintain a so-called Liberal image
with their public relations they are not true Liberals, any more
than certain of their lackeys who wear the Conservative label are
true Conservatives. As Nelson Rockefeller himself said in Dallas on
September 12, 1975, and I quote:
“Conservative and Liberal to me are
misleading as labels.”
These and other similar labels have
completely lost any utility they may once have had, thanks to their
control by the Rockefeller Brothers. Their only true loyalty is to
themselves, and that transcends all of the conventional boundaries
of political affiliation.
A perfect example of Rockefeller control of all sides of a political
situation is before us right now in the alleged Presidential
campaign. I say “alleged” because there is no doubt at all as to the
outcome under the Rockefeller scenario. Instead, the game is being
played for other reasons. For the moment the most prominent players
on the stage are four:
Humphrey, Reagan, Ford, and his
ventriloquist Rockefeller. Hubert Humphrey wears a big label
that reads “Liberal Democrat”, while the equally large label on
Ronald Reagan reads “Conservative Republican.” President Ford’s
label is a large question mark.
Nelson Rockefeller’s label which, by the way, is made of solid
gold, is rather large. It reads: “Liberal New Deal Democrat
turned instant Conservative Republican.”
It looks like quite a field, doesn’t it?
But it so happens that Nelson Rockefeller has the other three in the
palm of his hand and his own label is only for show.
Hubert Humphrey is currently the beneficiary of the so-called
‘Humphrey phenomenon’—an undeclared candidacy that is being made to
look impressive by the Rockefeller major media and by polls which
can easily be manipulated. Humphrey’s well concealed control of a
huge major multinational oil company for over 20 years has been very
helpful to his Rockefeller supporters behind the scenes. Partly for
this reason, a possible multimillion-dollar tax case against him by
the Internal Revenue Service has been covered up under Presidential
seal, and the IRS-FBI agents who worked on the case are no longer
around! Ronald Reagan, of course, is the polished actor who has been
rehearsing so-called Conservative lines ever since 1950. That was
the year when, during Congressional hearings, he officially admitted
his previously ultra-Liberal activities but claimed that he had seen
the light and was turning over a new leaf. Yet his actions, as
sharply distinguished from his words, have never really changed. He
has maintained many active ties with Rockefeller-dominated
organizations, such as their complex of governmental-controlled
groups known collectively as “1313” in Chicago. The Reagan
administration in California was heavily populated with people from
the Rockefeller stables and the Reagan record in California
parallels that of Rockefeller in New York in many ways, but Reagan
has consistently spoken as if his views and policies were totally
opposite to those of Rockefeller. Reagan’s service on Rockefeller’s
CIA cover-up commission earlier this year, therefore, helped to
quiet the cover-up fears of some who are not aware of Reagan’s
strong Rockefeller ties.
President Ford is where he is because then-President Nixon
double-crossed his boss Nelson Rockefeller. When Agnew was
forced to resign, Nixon was supposed to nominate Rockefeller; but
Nixon could see where that would lead, so instead he selected Gerald
Ford, whose political star had risen considerably after his
participation in the work and defense of the Warren Commission. Good
old ‘Jerry’ was well known and well liked by his colleagues, yet his
confirmation hearings bogged down unexpectedly. Behind the scenes
Nelson Rockefeller applied thebrakes until Ford agreed to nominate
him (Rockefeller) upon Nixon’s departure from the presidency. Once
the agreement was reached, Ford’s confirmation hearings rapidly
concludedfavorably. And Nelson Rockefeller immediately resigned
asGovernor of New York, surreptitiously moved into his Washington,
D.C. residence, and personally finished Watergating Nixon out ofthe
White House. Nelson was so proud of his success in this project that
he wrote to a banker friend in Mexico afterward to tell him all
about it. Can you imagine?
Thus Rockefeller control denies us any real choice in national
politics. Ultimately the Rockefellers choose all the presidential
candidates that count—and have ever since Woodrow Wilson’s time. We,
the voters, are then given the useless privilege of choosing which
of their hand-picked puppets we want, just like they do in Soviet
Russia. Even in the election itself, the deck is stacked in favor of
their preferred choice. But, just in case, they control the other
side too. If this isn’t “TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION”, I don’t
know what it is.
In Congress, too, most of our politicians end up in the Rockefeller
pocket one way or another. Some deliberately throw in their lot with
the Rockefellers and become active Rockefeller agents. Others become
compromised by skeletons in their closets, and are pawns in the
Rockefeller game of blackmail and double-cross here in Washington.
And still others just go along to get along, not rocking the boat.
And so when government abuses become so flagrant that they are
detected, we are still left without recourse because the
Rockefellers control the investigations in almost every case.
As I speak to you, the ante has gone up due to the leakage of
radioactive plutonium-239 super poison from the Bullion Depository
at Fort Knox, and the government is doing nothing whatsoever to stop
it! My previous information was that the region which has been
primarily affected by the leakage over the past several years
consists of a swath through Kentucky, my home state of West
Virginia, and Virginia with a combined population of over 9-million
people. But on November 8, 1975, a secret meeting was held in the
White House to discuss alternative means of disposing of the deadly
poison. The discussion included some ideas that would be as insane
as the poison itself—such as dumping all 60 pounds of it into the
underground streams that lie under Fort Knox. Not only might this
allow the poison to spread uncontrollably from there, but it could
possibly also cause contamination of any of the huge underground
caverns under Fort Knox which are used for natural gas storage. Now
if this were to happen, natural gas could carry traces of the
radioactive plutonium poison straight into the industrial plants and
homes of thousands of people in that area. The deadly plutonium
radiation would be unaffected by passing through gas flames, after
which it could be inhaled or set on to food.
I received no further information concerning the action, if any,
taken at the November 8 White House meeting; but I have received
updated information to the effect that the poison is now spreading
throughout the entire Southeast of the United States and even
beginning to enter the Gulf of Mexico. Thirty-six million Americans
are now at stake. And what is our government doing about it?
Nothing. The White House meeting had only one purpose: to save face
for the wrongdoers, not to save 36-million lives!
And what about Congress? And all those investigations we keep
hearing about? Consider Senator Frank Church who is our newest
presidential candidate. On November 20, 1975, he explained the
release of his Committee’s report about assassination plots on
foreign leaders with the words, and I quote: “The people were
entitled to know what went wrong, and why.” But when it comes to an
immediate deadly danger to all of us caused by the same elements of
the Intelligence community, apparently Senator Church believes we
are not entitled to know, since he has been covering up this vital
information now for four months while the situation grows steadily
worse. And for over two months the same has been true of his
counterpart in the House—Congressman Otis Pike. Meanwhile what else
is happening in the Executive Branch, specifically the Treasury
Department? My friend, I believe it is time to let you in on an
example of the evasions, half truths, and distortions which
Rockefeller bureaucrats use to cover their tracks. I call it a
lesson in bureaucratic gobbledygook, the slippery language that some
people also call double talk.
For over three months now, all of our attempts even to communicate
directly with the government about the twin disasters at Fort Knox
have met with nothing but a very loud silence. Having deepened and
confirmed their own guilt time and again through various slips in
the past, they apparently no longer have the courage or the courtesy
even to answer us! Through an indirect channel, however, we were
able to extract a letter from Mrs. Mary Brooks, the Director of the
Mint, dated November 21, 1975. This indirect channel is Congressman
Kenneth Robinson of Virginia who, while he does not choose to pursue
the Fort Knox matter on his own, has at least cooperated with us in
ways such as this. In this regard, he is exceptional. No one else in
the entire United States Congress has done even this much. As I read
the letter try, if you can, to find any clear-cut YES or NO type
answer to anything. You will only find one to the effect that a
certain statement, and I quote: “is simply not true.” But the
statement referred to is not our statement but a carefully selected
misstatement of our charges by someone else.
Now here’s the letter:
“Dear Mr. Robinson:
Thank you for your letter of November 10, 1975, concerning
allegations that plutonium-239 was stored in the so-called
Central Core Vault at the United States Bullion Depository, Fort
Knox, Kentucky.
We do not store plutonium-239 or any other radioactive substance
at the Depository, and have no reason to believe that it is
stored there by other government agencies. We authorized the
Military at Fort Knox to make radiation tests in the Depository
last week. We were informed that the tests did not disclose any
evidence of radioactive material.
The allegations relating to the so-called Central Core Vault are
carried in a Swiss Newsletter entitled ‘Myers Finance and
Energy’ that is currently being circulated by those who have
persisted with all the wild allegations about the Bullion
Depository at Fort Knox. The Newsletter discusses Dr. Peter D.
Beter’s allegations and states (and the letter quotes as
follows):
‘In 1942-43 Major Stanley Tatom
designed and oversaw the construction of a Central Core
Vault below the Main Vault. To get to this ultrasafe vault,
an elevator had to be installed and it used up the space
occupied by 12 of the former Vault compartments. This
explains why the numbering in the Vault compartments
upstairs had a 12-digit gap.’”
And Mrs. Brooks’ letter continues, and I
quote:
“This statement is simply not true.
There were no major alterations to the Vault after construction
of the Depository was completed in 1936. The elevator was
installed at the time the Depository was constructed. We have no
record of Major Stanley Tatom designing or overseeing the
construction of a Central Core Vault. In fact we do not, and
find no record that we ever did, refer to any part of the
Depository by that name.
The Visitors Log at the Depository does show the name of Major
Daniel F. Tatum as calling on the officer in charge on July 29,
1942. We also have records which show that a steel door was
erected by the Champion Wire & Iron Works, Louisville, Kentucky,
at the entrance to the corridor that leads to Compartments
numbered 1 through 14 in the basement level of the Depository.
This work was completed on January 7, 1942, and the No. 15 was
assigned to the door. After this work was completed, gold was
stored in the corridor for a time during which the door was
locked and sealed.”
Still quoting from her letter:
“The allegation that there is a
12-digit gap in the numbering of compartments is also
inaccurate. Our records show that the Depository had 28
compartments, 14 on the lower level and 14 on the upper level at
the time of construction. The compartments on the lower level
were numbered 1 through 14, and the corridor door was numbered
15 when it was added in 1942. The compartments on the upper
level were numbered 21 through 34. There is no record of the
numbers 16 through 20 ever being used on Vault compartments of
the Depository.
If I could be of further assistance in this matter, please let
me know.
Sincerely,”
and there follows the signature of
“Mary Brooks, Director of the Mint.”
My friend, letters like this one are the
product of a year and a half of continuous effort on their part to
refine their story and put their very best foot forward. They are
written with great care, with careful choice of every word. The
letter I have just read to you, in fact, was not even written by
Mary Brooks alone. Much of it was written by an official in the
General Accounting Office who has ties to the Intelligence industry.
The GAO itself is implicated in the Fort Knox cover-up through the
falsified Gold Audit done in the fall of 1974, so this letter is
important, and it deserves closer examination.
First: Why does the Government deliberately go so far out of its
way, to Switzerland no less, to find someone else’s misstatement of
the Bullion Depository modifications so that they can attack that
instead of refuting our own statements? If they can refute our
actual charges, why don’t they do it? I invite the Government to
listen to my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 2 for July 1975 and respond to
that, not someone else’s secondhand statements. As I clearly stated
then, the Central Core Vault was built into the Depository at the
start. Major Tatom’s job later on was to build a rapid retrieval
system into the Gold Vault, not to build the Vault itself. I also
explained that there is a gap of six digits, not 12, on each floor
of Vault compartments. My friend, the Government is acutely aware of
my real charges, so why don’t they answer them? What do you think?
Notice also, in trying to wave aside references to Major Stanley
Tatom, how cleverly it is done! We can prove that he was there and
did oversee the work on the rapid retrieval system, and apparently
the Government knows we can.
Therefore the following sentence is used
to mislead without actually lying, and I quote:
“We have no record of Major Stanley
Tatom designing or overseeing the construction of a Central Core
Vault.”
Of course they don’t, because that is
just not what he did. He built a rapid retrieval system to give
access to the Central Core Vault. The writers of the letter included
one other item whichwas intended to help throw everyone off the
track, but actually does just the opposite. According to our own
sources, during the work on the rapid retrieval system in 1942-43,
the disruption was so great that the gold was taken out of the
Central Core Vault and, quote: “piled around in the corridors.” Now
we are told in this letter about the strange corridor door, which
was installed for unstated reasons. Listen again to these
astonishing words from Mrs. Brooks’ letter, and I quote:
“This work was completed on January
7, 1942, and the No. 15 was assigned to the door. After this
work was completed, gold was stored in the corridor for a time
during which the door was locked and sealed.”
Mrs. Brooks does not tell us for how
long a time, much less why!
But thanks to our own information, she doesn’t have to tell us. I
suggest that you replay Mrs. Brooks’ letter all the way through and
see for yourself what you will pick up. For example, listen to all
the assertions and denials that are all couched in the words, quote:
“Our records show ...” or “We have no record...”—this coming from
the same office whose records are so suspect in other ways.
Records of the quality of gold stored in Fort Knox and elsewhere, as
I have revealed on other occasions, have disagreed with one another
in glaring ways. The official Mint records omit shipments we can
prove from Fort Knox. Even the case of the missing experimental
aluminum pennies that has erupted lately is another example of the
‘dependability’ of United States Mint records.
But notice also that the letter spends the least time on the most
important matter of all—the radioactive plutonium poison stored in
the Central Core Vault. It is stated that the radiation tests by the
Military, quote: “...did not disclose any evidence of radioactive
material.” In much the same vein, and with similar bureaucratic
phrases like, quote: “We have no evidence...”, the Kentucky
Department of Human Resources claims that there is nothing to worry
about. But, my friend, plutonium radiation is very hard to detect,
yet very deadly if it gets inside your body. Experts sum it up with
the phrase:
“If there is enough plutonium to
detect, it is already too much.”
Therefore nothing less than a serious,
comprehensive, honest check by top experts with the best equipment
available can be considered satisfactory. The stakes for over
36-million Americans in the Southeast United States are too high to
settle for less. The United States Government expects you to just
take their word for it regardless of what they may tell you. No
proof, no criteria, just believe what they say.
CHALLENGE TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Well, my friend, I do not ask you to do that. I am now going to
issue a challenge to the federal government either to confirm or
refute my charges about the plutonium poison leaking from the
Bullion Depository at Fort Knox—openly, fairly, and conclusively.
Furthermore, I am going to state clearly what my criteria are for a
test of my charges that I believe the American people could accept
and believe in.
Here specifically is what I propose:
First, formation of a truly
blue-ribbon committee to test for plutonium poison leakage from
the Bullion Depository at Fort
Knox, this committee to consist of scientists, recognized
authorities fully qualified for such a task. If my challenge is
accepted, the committee must include certain individuals whose
names I will reveal at that time. The Government may nominate an
equal number of scientists to the committee. However, my
nominees will be men who are not my employees or associates; and
likewise any members of the committee nominated by the
Government must not be federal employees unless my own
information indicates that they can be trusted. In other words,
the committee must be independent and totally unbiased.
Second, this committee is to be given complete authority
and discretion over the conduct of the plutonium poison
investigation. They are to be provided at federal government
expense with any and all technical assistance they may request
as well as the most up-to-date and effective instrumentation.
This must include the 1026 multichannel analyzer and any other
devices they may specify. They must also have the right by
majority vote of the committee to add other experts to their
investigating committee if they deem it necessary. They are not
to be interfered with or limited in any way. Should federal or
other authorities choose to impose limitations, the
investigating committee shall be empowered to immediately state
any objections they may have to these limitations over live
nation-wide television and radio so that their message cannot be
edited out or reinterpreted by anyone else.
Third: Upon completion of their investigation, the
investigating committee shall be granted up to one hour of live
broadcast time on nation-wide radio and television to present
their findings, and also their recommendations if my charges are
confirmed. I am willing to accept their conclusion as final if
it is unanimous, and the federal government must agree to do the
same.
There is no time to be lost. If you
agree that my proposal is reasonable, start passing the word and
applying public opinion pressure to make it happen. Otherwise the
ever-expanding control exercised by the Rockefeller Brothers will
prevent it. It is UP TO YOU, because the once free, once great major
media in America are being gobbled up ever more completely by the
Rockefellers. Their latest victim is the mighty Hearst publishing
empire, whose publications reach a total audience of nearly
86-million adults. This take-over is the bottom line in the tragic
Patty Hearst case involving the CIA-financed SLA. A stock transfer
to a tax-free Foundation controlled by the Rockefellers was the
objective, and it has now been accomplished.
It’s sad that we have to look overseas to see any meaningful
reporting about the Fort Knox plutonium disaster.
In the Financial Times of London for
Thursday December 11, 1975, the story was broken by C. Gordon Tether
whose financial column is read the world over. In his article titled
“A NEW TWIST OF FORT KNOX SAGA”, he reviews the Fort Knox Gold
Scandal cover-up and then informs his readers of the latest charges
concerning plutonium. He ends the article with words that no
columnist of his stature in America has yet dared to write, and I
quote:
“But whatever the cost in terms of
loss of face, might not the United States authorities be well
advised to do whatever is necessary to demonstrate that there is
no Ft. Knox cover-up? In the light of what is happening in the
United States during the past few years, deeds inevitably now
speak louder than words; and the refusal to prove that they have
nothing to hide is inevitably destined to go on fostering
precisely the opposite impression.”
Topic #2
- On December 11, 1975, New York City
went into default. Hundreds of millions of dollars in City notes
came due on that day, and the City did not pay as promised. A
DEFAULT is nothing more or less than a failure to pay, and that’s
exactly what happened. “But wait a minute”, you may say.
“President Ford announced that he
would ask Congress to give New York City 2.3-billion dollars in
loans because New York bailed itself out. What’s going on here?”
What is going on, my friend, is just
another Rockefeller shell game. New York City has declared a
three-year moratorium, so called, on payment of 1.6-billion dollars
of City notes. Anyone holding one of those notes cannot cash it in
for three years, and will also receive a lowered rate of interest
during that time. New York noteholders do have another choice
though. Until December 29, a few days from now, these noteholders
may, if they wish, trade their notes for bonds issued by the
“Municipal Assistance Corporation”, or otherwise known as “MAC”, on
behalf of New York City. These bonds cannot be cashed in for 10
years or more, but they carry a higher rate of interest. And, oh
yes, there’s one other little uncertainty: MAC is a so-called “moral
obligation agency”, an idea given birth by Nelson Rockefeller and
his own lawyer John Mitchell, and its bonds are “moral obligation
bonds.” Its promise to pay the bonds when they come due is not
backed up by a legal obligation on the part of New York City, New
York State, or anyone else. Either way, the person who simply wants
to cash in his City note as it comes due is now out of luck, he
can’t do it; so New York City is in default.
Don’t be misled by the fact that the major media under Rockefeller
control are not using that word “default” for the time being. As I
pointed out last month in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6, the dress
rehearsal for default in New York some weeks ago was used to give
that word “default” a very apocalyptic meaning. The word is
therefore being saved for the right moment. Meanwhile, the effect of
this New York failure to pay is already spreading through our
economy. Municipalities all over America, and even abroad, are
suddenly finding it hard to sell the bonds. As the municipal bond
market dries up, so will funds for public employees, projects, etc.
The domino effect has already started, but our advance revelations
have made it dangerous for them to highlight this just yet. But you
can be sure that the word “default” has not been so carefully given
its present frightening connotations without a purpose—and it may be
that we will all see that purpose within a matter of a few days. A
court ruling is due soon concerning the Constitutionality of the
so-called moratorium imposed by New York. Should it be ruled
unConstitutional, financial chaos will be the result in New York,
and that chaos will quickly be labeled “default.”
There are a whole string of other time bombs like that too, all
ticking away. When the time is just right, the Rockefeller Brothers
can set off whichever one is the handiest. When they do, the results
will be the same, regardless of the exact timing. Armed with this
knowledge, I hope you have taken the necessary steps to protect
yourself, such as I described in my AUDIO BOOK No. 1, on “HOW TO
PROTECT YOURSELF DURING THE COMING DEPRESSION AND THIRD WORLD WAR.”
Meanwhile, gradualism continues to be the word for the step by step
actions of the Rockefeller Brothers; so if you watch the
Stock Market, for example, don’t fall into the trap of reading great
significance into the daily up-and-down wiggles. What counts is the
month-to-month trend—and that is down. The Stock Market crash
actually began in July 1975, as I said it would, but it does not yet
suit the purposes of the Rockefeller Brothers for this to be obvious
to all. Instead, the overall market is sinking downward in gradual,
almost imperceptible phases. It is crashing in slow motion like a
bad dream.
Meanwhile most people—that is, those who do not specialize in the
Stock Market and financial matters—generally keep track of little
more than the Dow Jones industrial average. There are nearly 2,000
stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange but the Dow index is an
average of just 30 of them. They were chosen to be representative of
the whole Market, assuming no manipulation, but that assumption is
no longer correct. Very special attention is paid to the
manipulation of prices of these 30 stocks. As a result, the real
behavior of the Market can be completely hidden from the general
public. Whenever man is involved, races will be fixed.
Turning to the monetary picture, a development I first revealed in
April of this year has just happened. At the 1975 “International
Gold and Monetary Conference” here in Washington, D.C., I revealed
confidential information to the effect that the Soviet Union would
soon be issuing an international gold ruble, and just a few days ago
it happened. The Soviet Union has introduced their “chervonetz”, or
10-ruble gold piece. It bears the date 1975, and only 250,000 have
been minted, 50,000 of which are already here in the United States
out of 125,000 to be consigned to the United States. Under a 1923
Soviet law it is legal tender, making it convertible. This new gold
coin is an attempt by the Russians for the first time in 52 years to
penetrate the world gold-coin market and to compete directly with
the “krugerrand” issued by South Africa. The chervonetz is about
one-quarter of the size and value of the krugerrand, which means
that South Africa will have to take measures to compete with it. The
other major event, supposedly in the monetary sphere, is the
Monetary Conference, so called, at Rambouillet Castle near Paris
late last month. It was a summit meeting of the Big Six—the United
States, France, Britain, West Germany, Italy, and Japan, but please
note that Canada was not there, and for very good reasons.
First, here’s what happened, then I will explain why it happened,
which is far more important.
Treasury Secretary Simon said on his way back from the meeting which
took place over the week-end of November 16, 1975, that a compromise
had been reached on exchange rates, among other things. France
wanted fixed rates, while the United States had been campaigning for
a “free” float to continue. The compromise that was reached is just
what I had told you it would be: stable yet flexible rates of
exchange, which they chose to call a “managed float.” Simon also
said he hoped that, quote:
“the agreement will be approved at
an international meeting in January, and that Congress will
readily approve necessary changes in the Articles governing the
operation of the International Monetary Fund.”
Now a “managed float” from a legal point
of view does not require any change in the Articles that govern the
IMF unless it
changes the par value of gold. So what is brewing now is a system of
so-called “stable yet flexible rates of exchange”
indirectly tied to a par value of gold. I revealed in my monthly
AUDIO LETTER No. 5 for October 1975 that the plan is to repeg gold
at or about $195.00 per ounce, and this is still on track. This, in
effect, will amount to still another devaluation of the dollar, and
the official price of gold ($42.22) will be abolished beginning
early next year. Keep in mind that the private gold markets will not
be closed; and after this action, private gold prices will go past
the $195 mark. A leapfrog condition will have been set in motion
that will jack the price of gold higher and higher, and the process
will be intensified by the coming war and world-wide economic
problems. David Rockefeller’s gold skyrocket will be launched at
last; but the 50-million ounces of gold to be sold by the IMF will
never reach the private market, going instead to the central bankers
by way of sale, auction, or restitution. Five-million ounces of
this, returned to the United States under the restitution provision,
will be used in an attempt to continue to cover up the Fort Knox
Gold Scandal along with gold now being smuggled into the United
States by the CIA for the private coffers of the Rockefeller
Brothers.
The biggest question about Rambouillet is: Why did the United States
compromise? The answer is that a “free-floating” system would be too
uncontrollable during the upcoming limited nuclear war against the
Arab OPEC nations which is targeted to begin late in February 1976,
just two months from now. So the United States had to compromise to
complete its preparations for this war. What I am telling you, my
friend, is a military secret, or was until I revealed it in detail
in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6 last month. The code name for this
military attack, by the way, is “OPERATION COBRA”, and preparations
for it are moving rapidly. Already the first detachment of crack
United States Marines are now in Germany ready for swift deployment
into the Sinai, where war will break out; and the build-up toward
the staged provocation to ignite the conflict—namely, an attack on
the so-called American advisers in the Sinai—is progressing
steadily. Only today, December 21, 1975, the latest step was taken
in this plan when a CIA-supported group made a provocative attack on
OPEC Oil Ministers at their headquarters in Vienna, Austria. This is
intended to lead, by stages, to reprisal actions against the
Americans stationed in the Sinai.
HOW THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN ROCKEFELLER CORPORATE SOCIALISM AND SOVIET
STATE SOCIALISM IS TAKING US INTO NUCLEAR WAR Now I turn briefly to
Topic #3.
Topic #3
- As I explained last month, the limited
nuclear war which is scheduled to begin soon in the Middle East is
only a part of a much larger picture. The Rockefeller Brothers have
designs on India, while the Soviet Union has its eyes on China. In
resource-rich Africa, both the Rockefellers and their Soviet allies
have an interest. So the real theater in the war now brewing is
Asia. After the OPEC oil wells are capped by the nuclear strike,
Russia’s western flank (Europe) will be crippled and Africa will be
more easily finished off by the guerrilla warfare already going on
there. Oil-hungry Japan will be thrown into the arms of Red China
which, by the way, has just announced it can now export oil; and the
stage will be set for the big Asian war that is to be the next round
in the bloody game of global monopoly. The strategy of all this was
spelled out in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6 last month. My purpose
now, however, is simply to point out the basic nature of all this.
It is, my friend, a DRIVE FOR CONTROL—control of people, of
resources, of the entire world. Furthermore, it is a product of
unholy alliance between the State Socialists in the Soviet Union and
the Corporate Socialists in the United States, the
Rockefeller Brothers and their client followers.
Many people mistake the Rockefeller Brothers for capitalists, but
that is not at all what they are. David Rockefeller, for example,
has been quoted as saying, “I believe in the enterprise system”, but
he does not say “free”, much less “competitive enterprise.” The
entire Rockefeller empire is built on the exact opposite of
that—monopolies and trusts. Their major multinational corporations
are an ingenious device for casting off loyalties to any country,
and they are already more powerful, collectively, than most nations.
The Rockefellers, you see, are Corporate Socialists. Corporate
Socialism and State Socialism are nothing more than two sides of the
same coin. Both boil down to the same thing—dictatorships or
near-dictatorships—enabling a very few people to control everyone
else. Once you grasp this fact, the alliance between the
Rockefellers and the Soviets will no longer surprise you, nor will
the fact that the Russian Revolution in 1917 was financed by the
Rockefeller interests. The State Socialism of Nazi Germany also
falls into place since it, too, was just another version of the same
pattern. In all of these cases, as well as many others we see today,
the Corporate Socialist empire of the Rockefeller Brothers gains
handsomely—mineral riches, oil, and other rewards—in return for
cooperation with State Socialism.
Thus it is that Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, a Rockefeller
agent for 20 years and more, defends the Soviet Union against
charges of cheating on the so-called SALT Arms Limitation agreement,
but allows his out-going Ambassador to Canada to publicly accuse our
closest neighbor of being “no longer reliable or to be trusted.”
Kissinger speaks not for you or me, but for the Rockefeller
Brothers; and to them, Russia is the ally, the friend, while our
close friends in Canada are the ‘enemy’, the people not to be
trusted, because Canada’s government now knows what is in the wind
and they are taking all the necessary steps to weather the storm.
The Canadian government wants no part of the coming war, monetary
chaos, and all the rest of it, and has privately said so to
Kissinger in no uncertain terms. So Canada has become ‘unreliable’,
which means outside the circle of firm Rockefeller control. Bravo
for Canada! Long may she continue on her independent course.
Ultimately the greedy misdeeds of the Rockefeller Brothers and their
allies will be their eventual undoing.
Even now both Nelson Rockefeller and
Henry Kissinger have doomed themselves by handling some of the gold
that was taken out of Fort Knox. That gold was contaminated by the
radioactive plutonium-239 super poison, and now their bodies are
contaminated with it. Even though they and the rest of the
Rockefeller organization may well succeed in destroying our Republic
IF WE DO NOT ACT, they will not live long to enjoy it. What poetic
justice! Their dose is even stronger than that received by the
Congressmen and newsmen who visited the Bullion Depository at Fort
Knox in September 1974. Yes, eventually, the huge empire of the
Rockefeller Brothers and their allies will tear itself apart, and
perhaps destroy the world in the process. But meanwhile, IF WE DO
NOT ACT NOW, there will be untold suffering for millions—ourselves,
our children, and probably our children’s children. Can we possibly
sit by and let that happen? Or do we act NOW, while we still can,
and take back our rightful control over our own destinies? For me,
there can be only one choice, and I hope for YOU as well.
Until next month, this is Dr. Beter. I wish all of you a blessed
Christmas and a healthy, happy, holy New Year. May God
bless each and every one of you.
|