Several years ago I mentally created a "Faraday Cage" to shield a
man from mental control by
the Anunnaki evil space beings. It worked
and started a war between them and warrior angels.
After reading this article, I mentally
created a skin-tight Faraday cage around all animal life forms
including humans, designed to short out all radiation (as
wind-driven rain drops are blocked by the screen in a screen door.) I
am being told that it is working.
Then I did a healing mantra to heal all
the damage done by radiation to the organs in all animal life forms.
I also created Faraday cages around all active and future active bee
hives I would like to hear from a bee keeper to confirm if the bees
are coming back. My URL is
My E-mail address is
I read in A COURSE IN MIRACLES that there is no degree of
difficulty in miracles. I believe I made two miracles happen this
morning. I wrote an E-mail letter to the woman who first had asked
for help to check with her Guru to see if this story is true, and if
true, I would publish it.
She wrote back that he said it was true,
and she said to "Go for it", so here it is.
(The following two letters are a
follow-up substantiating the efficacy of the Faraday Cages)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 11:44
Subject: Re: Faraday Cages
FROM: Patrick H. Bellringer
TO: John OBrien
DATE: June 28, 2007
Dear John OBrien:
Thank you for your letter and your
wise actions to stop the harm being done to humans by cell phone
technology today. Indeed, miracles have no degree of difficulty.
Miracles happen based upon your belief in the power of your God
Spirit within, that power of Creation, which all souled beings
Your belief "that it would work" has
made it happen, and the harmful effects of cell phone technology
has been neutralized on Earth Shan. In your mind creation did
you make this protection both complete and permanent, and
inclusive of all life forms on our planet? (YES) Did you, also,
correct the damage already done by cell phone technology? (YES)
My reading is that your "work" has been most effective in
stopping any further harmful effects of cell phone technology,
and that the Darkside is most unhappy with you. So, my brother,
ask for Divine Protection, both complete and permanent, and we
shall do the same for you.
We honor you for your faith and wisdom.
In Love and Light,
Dear Mr Bellringer
You are right. The dark side has been after me long after they
were supposedly banished from Lebanon. I have been "uncreating"
their dark bodies, giving their spirits the gift of
unconditional love and sending them back to "Source" where they
can be reincarnated with a running start.
Then in desperation they started calling for help. The first
answer was 15,000 space ships that came from the DAL (Dark And
Light) Universe. I got rid of the dark occupants the same way,
and found that the space ships and mind-controlled crew were
Pleiadian. So I had 15,000 operational space-energy powered
ships, and their thankful crew on my hands.
I had been making a deal with the Pleiadeans to temporarily
furnish the Airlines with shuttle craft while we created
manufacturing plants to make our own. But now we didn't have to.
In the meantime
the DAL universe had become the
dAL Universe, with fewer d's.
But the remaining dark side was not satisfied. Two more dark
warrior nations sent about 15,000 ships each from the
Omniuniverse, (apparently competition caused them to have equal
numbers). The warrior occupants (I don't know from where) were
dispatched the same way, and I GOT LEFT WITH ABOUT 45,000 SPACE
SHIPS. I have turned them all over to the Pleiadeans.
Maybe we will see them in the mass
fly-by when it occurs. In the mean time, I have interested
FED-EX in trying 10 of them. They are large enough to beam up
and down their standard size bulk shipping containers. My guides
tell me that they are starting to use them on a trial basis and
they are delighted with them. The latest word is they have been
given a total of 1,000 space ships, and parking their cargo
BACK TO THE dAL UNIVERSE:
Patrick: I got a message that most
of the dark entities in the dAL Universe were committing
suicide, (MOSTLY WOMAN AND CHILDREN, they felt they were
unprotected with all their space ships and warriors gone and
they were long overdue to disappear anyway in this reality) So
I did them a favor and uncreated the spiritually dark bodies of
the whole race, if it was for the greatest good.
I gave their spirits the gift of
Unconditional Love and returned them to Source. Now I understand
there is a grand reunion taking place with families re-uniting.
I imagine the families will reincarnate into the same family on
a different planet and try to get it right this time.
What do you get?
(Back to original article)
May 02, 2007
Gro Harlem Brundtland,
then head of the World Health Organization (WHO), told a Norwegian
journalist that cell phones were banned from her office in Geneva
because she personally becomes ill if a cell phone is brought within
about four meters (13 feet) of her.
Mrs. Brundtland is a medical doctor and
former Prime Minister of Norway. This sensational news, published
March 9, 2002 in Dagbladet, was ignored by every other newspaper in
the world. The following week Michael Repacholi, her
subordinate in charge of the International EMF (electromagnetic
field) Project, responded with a public statement belittling his
Five months later, for reasons that many
suspect were related to these circumstances, Mrs. Brundtland
announced she would step down from her leadership post at the WHO
after just one term.
Nothing could better illustrate our collective schizophrenia when it
comes to thinking about electromagnetic radiation. We respond to
those who are worried about its dangers - hence the
International EMF Project - but we ignore and marginalize those, like Mrs. Brundtland, who have already succumbed to its effects.
As a consultant on the health effects of wireless technology, I
receive calls that can be broadly divided into two main groups:
those from people who are merely worried, whom I will call A
those from people who are already sick, whom I will call B
sometimes wish I could arrange a large conference call and have the
two groups talk to each other - there needs to be more mutual
understanding so that we are all trying to solve the same problems.
Caller A, worried, commonly asks what
kind of shield to buy for his cell phone or what kind of headset to
wear with it. Sometimes he wants to know what is a safe distance to
live from a cell tower.
Caller B, sick, wants to know what kind
of shielding to put on her house, what kind of medical treatment to
get, or, increasingly often, what part of the country she could move
to to escape the radiation to save her life.
The following is designed as a sort of a primer: first, to help
everybody get more or less on the same page, and second, to clear up
some of the confusions so that we can make rational decisions toward
a healthier world.
The most basic fact about cell phones and cell towers is that they
emit microwave radiation; so do Wi-Fi (wireless Internet) antennas,
wireless computers, cordless (portable) phones and their base units,
and all other wireless devices. If it’s a communication device and
it’s not attached to the wall by a wire, it’s emitting radiation.
Most Wi-Fi systems and some cordless
phones operate at the exact same frequency as a microwave oven,
while other devices use a different frequency. Wi-Fi is always on
and always radiating. The base units of most cordless phones are
always radiating, even when no one is using the phone. A cell phone
that is on but not in use is also radiating. And, needless to say,
cell towers are always radiating.
Why is this a problem, you might ask? Scientists usually divide the
electromagnetic spectrum into “ionizing” and “non-ionizing.”
Ionizing radiation, which includes x-rays and atomic radiation,
Non-ionizing radiation, which includes microwave
radiation, is supposed to be safe
This distinction always reminded me of
the propaganda in George Orwell’s Animal Farm:
“Four legs good, two legs bad.”
“Non-ionizing good, ionizing bad” is
as little to be trusted.
An astronomer once quipped that if Neil
Armstrong had taken a cell phone to the Moon in 1969, it would have
appeared to be the third most powerful source of microwave radiation
in the universe, next only to the Sun and the Milky Way.
He was right.
Life evolved with negligible levels of
microwave radiation. An increasing number of scientists speculate
that our own cells, in fact, use the microwave spectrum to
communicate with one another, like children whispering in the dark,
and that cell phones, like jackhammers, interfere with their
signaling. In any case, it is a fact that we are all being
bombarded, day in and day out, whether we use a cell phone or not,
by an amount of microwave radiation that is some ten million times
as strong as the average natural background.
And it is also a fact that most of this
radiation is due to technology that has been developed since the
As far as cell phones themselves are concerned, if you put one up to
your head you are damaging your brain in a number of different ways.
First, think of a microwave oven. A cell phone, like a microwave
oven and unlike a hot shower, heats you from the inside out, not
from the outside in. And there are no sensory nerve endings in the
brain to warn you of a rise in temperature because we did not evolve
with microwave radiation, and this never happens in nature.
Worse, the structure of the head and
brain is so complex and non-uniform that “hot spots” are produced,
where heating can be tens or hundreds of times what it is nearby.
Hot spots can occur both close to the surface of the skull and deep
within the brain, and also on a molecular level.
Cell phones are regulated by the Federal Communications
Commission, and you can find, in the packaging of most new
phones, a number called the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), which
is supposed to indicate the rate at which energy is absorbed by the
brain from that particular model. One problem, however, is the
arbitrary assumption, upon which the FCC’s regulations are based,
that the brain can safely dissipate added heat at a rate of up to 1°
C per hour.
Compounding this is the scandalous
procedure used to demonstrate compliance with these limits and give
each cell phone its SAR rating. The standard way to measure SAR is
on a “phantom” consisting, incredibly, of a homogenous fluid encased
in Plexiglas in the shape of a head. Presto, no hot spots! But in
reality, people who use cell phones for hours per day are
chronically heating places in their brain.
The FCC’s safety standard, by the way,
was developed by electrical engineers, not doctors.
The second effect that I want to focus on, which has been proven in
the laboratory, should by itself have been enough to shut down this
industry and should be enough to scare away anyone from ever using a
cell phone again. I call it the “smoking gun” of cell phone
experiments. Like most biological effects of microwave radiation,
this has nothing to do with heating.
The brain is protected by tight junctions between adjacent cells of
capillary walls, the so-called blood-brain barrier, which, like a
border patrol, lets nutrients pass through from the blood to the
brain, but keeps toxic substances out. Since 1988, researchers in
the laboratory of a Swedish neurosurgeon, Leif Salford, have
been running variations on this simple experiment: they expose young
laboratory rats to either a cell phone or other source of microwave
radiation, and later they sacrifice the animals and look for albumin
in their brain tissue.
Albumin is a protein that is a normal
component of blood but that does not normally cross the blood-brain
barrier. The presence of albumin in brain tissue is always a sign
that blood vessels have been damaged and that the brain has lost
some of its protection.
The implications for us?
two minutes on a cell phone disrupts the
two hours on a cell phone causes permanent
secondhand radiation may be almost as bad
blood-brain barrier is the same in a rat and a human being.
These results caused enough of a commotion in Europe that in
November 2003 a conference was held, sponsored by the European
Union, titled “The
Blood-Brain Barrier - Can It Be Influenced by RF-Field Interactions?”
as if to reassure the public:
“See, we are doing something about
But, predictably, nothing was done about
it, as nothing has been done about it for 30 years.
America’s Allan Frey, during the 1970s, was the first of many
to demonstrate that low-level microwave radiation damages the
blood-brain barrier.2 Similar mechanisms protect the eye
(the blood-vitreous barrier) and the fetus (the placental barrier),
and the work of Frey and others indicates that microwave radiation
damages those barriers also.3 The implication: No
pregnant woman should ever be using a cell phone.
Dr. Salford is quite outspoken about his work. He has called the use
of handheld cell phones “the largest human biological experiment
And he has publicly warned that a whole
generation of cell-phone-using teenagers may suffer from mental
deficits or Alzheimer’s disease by the time they reach middle age.
Unfortunately, cell phone users are not the only ones being injured,
nor should we be worried only about the brain.
The following brief
summary is distilled from a vast scientific literature on the
effects of radio waves (a larger spectrum which includes
microwaves), together with the experiences of scientists and doctors
all over the world with whom I am in contact.
Organs that have been shown to be especially susceptible to radio
waves include the lungs, nervous system, heart, eyes, testes and
Diseases that have increased remarkably
in the last couple of decades, and that there is good reason to
connect with the massive increase in radiation in our environment,
Radiation from microwave towers has also
been associated with forest die-off, reproductive failure and
population decline in many species of birds, and ill health and
birth deformities in farm animals.
The literature showing biological
effects of microwave radiation is truly enormous, running to tens of
thousands of documents, and I am amazed that industry spokespersons
are getting away with saying that wireless technology has been
proved safe or - just as ridiculous - that there is no evidence of
I have omitted one disease from the above list: the illness that
Caller B has, and that I have. A short history is in order here.
the 1950s and 1960s workers who built, tested and repaired radar
equipment came down with this disease in large numbers.
So did operators of industrial microwave
heaters and sealers. The Soviets named it, appropriately, radio wave
sickness, and studied it extensively. In the West its existence was
denied totally, but workers came down with it anyway. Witness
congressional hearings held in 1981, chaired by then Representative
Al Gore, on the health effects of radio-frequency heaters and
sealers, another episode in “See, we are doing something about
this,” while nothing is done.
Today, with the mass proliferation of radio towers and personal
transmitters, the disease has spread like a plague into the general
population. Estimates of its prevalence range up to one-third of the
population, but it is rarely recognized for what it is until it has
so disabled a person that he or she can no longer participate in
You may recognize some of its common symptoms:
ringing in the ears
Patients may also develop medical
problems such as:
chronic respiratory infections
sudden fluctuations in blood pressure
uncontrolled blood sugar
seizures and internal bleeding
What makes this disease so difficult to accept, and even more
difficult to cope with, is that no treatment is likely to succeed
unless one can also avoid exposure to its cause - and its cause is
A 1998 survey by the California Department of
Health Services indicated that at that time 120,000 Californians
- and by implication 1 million Americans - were unable to work due
to electromagnetic pollution.4 The ranks of these
so-called electrically sensitive are swelling in almost every
country in the world, marginalized, stigmatized and ignored.
With the level of radiation everywhere
today, they almost never recover and sometimes take their own lives.
“They are acting as a warning for
all of us,” says Dr. Olle Johansson of people with this illness.
“It could be a major mistake to subject the entire world’s
population to whole-body irradiation, 24 hours a day.”
A neuroscientist at the famous
Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Dr. Johansson heads a
research team that is documenting a significant and permanent
worsening of the public health that began precisely when the
second-generation, 1800 MHz cell phones were introduced into Sweden
in late 1997.5,6
After a decade-long decline, the number
of Swedish workers on sick leave began to rise in late 1997 and more
than doubled during the next five years. During the same period of
time, sales of antidepressant drugs also doubled. The number of
traffic accidents, after declining for years, began to climb again
in 1997. The number of deaths from Alzheimer’s disease, after
declining for several years, rose sharply in 1999 and had nearly
doubled by 2001.
This two-year delay is understandable
when one considers that Alzheimer’s disease requires some time to
If cell phones and cell towers are really deadly, have the radio and
TV towers that we have been living with for a century been safe?
2002 Örjan Hallberg and Olle Johansson coauthored a
paper titled “Cancer
Trends During the 20th Century,” which examined one
aspect of that question.7
They found, in the United States, Sweden
and dozens of other countries, that mortality rates for skin
melanoma and for bladder, prostate, colon, breast and lung cancers
closely paralleled the degree of public exposure to radio waves
during the past hundred years. When radio broadcasting increased in
a given location, so did those forms of cancer; when it decreased,
so did those forms of cancer.
And, a sensational finding: country by
country - and county by county in Sweden - they found,
statistically, that exposure to radio waves appears to be as big a
factor in causing lung cancer as cigarette smoking!
Which brings me to address a widespread misconception.
difference between the
cell towers of today and the radio towers of
the past is not their safety, but their numbers. The number of
ordinary radio stations in the United States today is still less
than 14,000. But cell towers and Wi-Fi towers number in the hundreds
of thousands, and cell phones, wireless computers, cordless
telephones and two-way radios number in the hundreds of millions.
Radar facilities and emergency
communication networks are also proliferating out of control. Since
1978, when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last surveyed
the radio frequency environment in the United States, the average
urban dweller’s exposure to radio waves has increased 1,000-fold,
most of this increase occurring in just the last nine years.8
In the same period of time, radio
pollution has spread from the cities to rest like a ubiquitous fog
over the entire planet.
The vast human consequences of all this are being ignored. Since the
late 1990s a whole new class of environmental refugees has been
created right here in the United States. We have more and more
people, sick, dying, seeking relief from our suffering, leaving our
homes and our livelihoods, living in cars, trailers and tents in
Unlike victims of hurricanes and
earthquakes, we are not the subject of any relief efforts. No one is
donating money to help us, to buy us a protected refuge; no one is
volunteering to forego their cell phones, their wireless computers
and their cordless phones so that we can once more be their
neighbors and live among them.
The worried and the sick have not yet opened their hearts to each
other, but they are asking questions.
To answer caller A: No shield or
headset will protect you from your cell or portable phone.
There is no safe distance from a cell tower. If your cell
phone or your wireless computer works where you live, you
are being irradiated 24 hours a day.
To caller B: To effectively
shield a house is difficult and rarely successful. There are
only a few doctors in the United States attempting to treat
radio wave sickness, and their success rate is poor -
because there are few places left on Earth where one can go
to escape this radiation and recover.
Yes, radiation comes down from satellites, too; they are
part of the problem, not the solution. There is simply no
way to make wireless technology safe.
Our society has become both socially and
economically dependent, in just one short decade, upon a technology
that is doing tremendous damage to the fabric of our world. The more
entrenched we let ourselves become in it, the more difficult it will
become to change our course.
The time to extricate ourselves, both
individually and collectively - difficult though it is already is -
1. Leif G. Salford et al., “Nerve
Cell Damage in Mammalian Brain After Exposure to Microwaves from
GSM Mobile Phones,” Environmental Health Perspectives 111, no. 7
2. Allan H. Frey, Sondra R. Feld and Barbara Frey, “Neural
Function and Behavior,” Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences 247 (1975): 433–439.
3. Allan H. Frey, “Evolution and Results of Biological Research
with Low-Intensity Nonionizing Radiation,” in Modern
Bioelectricity, ed. Andrew A. Marino (New York: Dekker, 1988),
785–837, at 809–810.
4. California EMF Program, The Risk Evaluation: An Evaluation of
the Possible Risks From Electric and Magnetic Fields (EMFs) From
Power Lines, Internal Wiring, Electrical Occupations and
Appliances (2002), app. 3.
5. Örjan Hallberg and Olle Johansson, “1997 - A Curious Year in
Sweden,” European Journal of Cancer Prevention 13, no. 6 (2004):
6. Örjan Hallberg and Olle Johansson, “Does GSM 1800 MHz Affect
the Public Health in Sweden?” in Proceedings of the 3rd
International Workshop “Biological Effects of EMFs,” Kos,
Greece, October 4-8, 2004, 361–364.
7. Örjan Hallberg and Olle Johansson, “Cancer Trends During the
20th Century,” Journal of Australian College of Nutritional and
Environmental Medicine 21, no. 1 (2002): 3–8.
8. David E. Janes Jr., “Radiofrequency Environments in the
United States,” in 15th IEEE Conference on Communication,
Boston, MA, June 10–14, 1979, vol. 2, 31.4.1–31.4.5.