by Catherine J. Frompovich
September 01, 2016
Can you see and feel its effects in the air?
Of course you can, but you don't know
how to identify it correctly!
It's all around us like an ocean of
electromagnetic frequencies that we are swimming in, which are
pulsed out from many more sources than we can begin to imagine and,
more confoundedly, not accept that they are causing damage to all
living elements, especially young children who are most vulnerable.
I'm talking about electromagnetic fields (EMFs) or radiofrequencies
(RFs), which have become so ubiquitous that we haven't stopped to
realize what's been happening to us - especially children exposed to
Wi-Fi in schools - and how trees  and other
plant life are being damaged.
Where do these EMFs come from?
Microwaves that are emitted by,
...and all 'smart'
appliances that contain
ZigBee chips, which are two-way radio transmitters operating
using microwave technologies.
Many people today are beginning to
realize that they function in what they call a 'fog' and can't
figure out why. They are run down with no energy and constantly
Does that sound like you or someone you know, especially
your children? Then think electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS).
Probably nothing is more unfriendly to
your personal health and environment than some iPhones 
and other 'smart' appliances you either wear on your person, e.g., a
'live' cell phone, or have in very constant close proximity, e.g.,
laptop computer that sits on your lap or legs!
Most, if not all, 'smart' appliances
operate using microwave technologies, which are not as safe as we
are led to believe, since that industry likes to promote
'science' that indicates no thermal effects when, in fact, for
numerous years non-thermal adverse health effects have been
documented and published which, if allowed to be mainstreamed, would
cost the microwave industry loads of money to correct the industry's
lies (think tobacco science)
about what they obviously know but do everything to keep regulatory
authorities from knowing and implementing protocols to deal with for
human health safety.
Here's a chart put out by the EPA of EMF
radiation dangers for popular appliances:
know that the frequency inside a microwave oven is 2.45 billion
Is your microwave oven door seal safe
and not leaking?
When was the last time you had it checked or
Here's more important information
operating microwave ovens.
Furthermore, there's something that I'd
like to point out regarding microwave cooked food taken from that
Microwaving makes food unhealthy
When the microwave radiation destroys and deforms food
molecules, new harmful compounds form (radiolytic
compounds). These dangerous compounds harm the body in many
Microwaved meals change blood
The research, from
Search for Health (Spring, 1992): After
study participants consumed microwaved vegetables, Swiss
Scientist Hertel measured the following effects:
significantly (creating anemic tendencies.)
Lymphocytes (white blood
cells) showed a significant term decrease.
(evidence by the increase of leukocyte)
NOTE: Leukocyte response can indicate pathogenic effects
such as poisoning and cell damage.
Microwaving human breast milk
likely reduces and reverses the potential benefits of food,
above and beyond the harm heating itself causes.
to Beat Disease - Foods Medicinal Qualities',
it is discussed in great detail the scientific research, etc. about
microwave cooking and what happens to microwaved food.
In the above chart, note the DANGER
ZONES for most sources.
One of the most unbelievable recent
marketing and 'politically correct' strategies for energy
conservation has been the introduction of compact
(CFL) bulbs,  which are so difficult to dispose
of because of their hazmat status (5 mgs +- of mercury [Hg] in each)
to replace incandescent light bulbs, which consumers used for
Besides containing mercury powder, they
emit EMFs too! 
However, that chart does not include
such appliances as baby monitors, routers, Wi-Fi, etc.
But the recently utility-mandated
retrofitted AMI Smart Meters for home and business utilities really
do a number on emitting EMFs/RFs.
Chart and Ronald Powell,
So, what does the above have to
do with the potential dangers of electromagnetic fields and their
effects on the environment?
One answer I offer is the strategies and
deceptive techniques the microwave industry, including states public
utility commissions plus utilities, utilize to keep adverse
non-thermal health effects information under wraps by denying that
such health effects have been documented scientifically.
In the European Union, there's a
different approach that needs to be implemented. It's the
European Union Parliament's Resolution 1815 adopted in 2011,
which goes into detail about the potential dangers of EMFs and their
Here, in part, are some of that
Resolution's statements, which ought to raise red flags for
everyone, including state public utility commissions:
All populations are now exposed in varying
degrees to electromagnetic fields, the levels of which will
continue to increase as technology advances.
electrical and electromagnetic fields in certain frequency bands
have wholly beneficial effects which are applied in medicine,
other non-ionizing frequencies, whether from extremely low
frequencies, power lines or certain high frequency waves used in
the fields of,
to have more or less potentially harmful, non-thermal,
biological effects on plants, insects and animals as well as the
human body, even when exposed to levels that are below the
official threshold values.
[That's something public utility
commissions everywhere should be concerned about regarding AMI
Smart Meters retrofitted by utility companies, but totally
disregard. Will consumers start lawsuits against both utility
companies and PUCs for fraud and harmful business practices?]
Moreover, the precautionary principle should be
applied when scientific evaluation does not allow the risk to be
determined with sufficient certainty.
Given the context of growing exposure of the
population, in particular that of vulnerable groups such as
young people and children, there could be extremely high human
and economic costs if early warnings are neglected.
[Again, something states public
utility commissions totally disregard - the
… there is still a lack of reaction to known or
emerging environmental and health risks and virtually systematic
delays in adopting and implementing effective preventive
Waiting for high levels of scientific and
clinical proof before taking action to prevent well-known risks
can lead to very high health and economic costs, as was the case
with asbestos, leaded petrol and tobacco.
[What I've underscored above is
critical in the deliberate EMF debacle no one in federal, state
or local governments wants to address!]
Moreover, the Assembly notes that the problem of
electromagnetic fields or waves and their potential consequences
for the environment and health has clear parallels with other
current issues, such as the licensing of medication, chemicals,
pesticides, heavy metals or genetically modified organisms.
It therefore highlights that the issue of
independence and credibility of scientific expertise is crucial
to accomplish a transparent and balanced assessment of potential
negative impacts on the environment and human health.
[No. 7 is where the rubber meets the
road! However, no one is doing anything about it, in my opinion,
especially those who are responsible for creating the problems,
the microwave industry itself, and government regulatory
agencies, who should know better than to allow such harms to
occur, thereby acting as accessories to the fact, I think.]
All the recommendations set forth in
Item 8 of the EU's Resolution should be implemented immediately, if
not sooner, by federal and state utility and telecommunications
regulatory agencies, but don't hold your breath.
Money talks too much, and lobbyists
certainly do a very effective job for utilities and microwave
industries to keep their 'tobacco science' about microwaves in the
'dark ages' of science and technology.