by Mike Adams
the Health Ranger
October 01, 2010
In a recent TED conference presentation,
Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new
vaccine efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its
He presents a formula for tracking CO2
emissions as follows:
CO2 = P x S x E x C.
P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit
Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero,
"probably one of
these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."
Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number
- P (for People) -
might be reduced.
"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about
9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health
care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps
10 or 15 percent."
Watch this for yourself...
Reducing the world population through vaccines
This statement by Bill Gates was not made with any hesitation,
stuttering or other indication that it might have been a mistake. It
appears to have been a deliberate, calculated part of a well
developed and coherent presentation.
So what does it mean when Bill Gates says,
"if we do a really
job on new vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15
Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of
So is "health care," which all NaturalNews
readers already know to be more of a "sick care" system that
actually harms more people than it helps. Perhaps that's the whole
point of it.
Given that vaccines
help almost no one from a scientific point of
it raises the question:
For what purpose are vaccines being so
heavily pushed in the first place?
Bill Gates seems to be saying that one of the primary purposes is to
reduce the global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce
Once again, watch the
video yourself to hear him say it
in his own words...
How can vaccines actually be used to reduce world population?
Let's conduct a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are to
be used to reduce world population, they obviously need to be
accepted by the majority of the people.
Otherwise the population
reduction effort wouldn't be very effective.
And in order for them to be accepted by the majority of the people,
they obviously can't just kill people outright. If everybody started
dropping dead within 24 hours of receiving the flu shot, the danger
of vaccines would become obvious rather quickly and the vaccines
would be recalled.
Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population
reduction effort, there are really only three ways in which they
might theoretically be "effective" from the point of view of those
who wish to reduce world population:
They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable,
taking effect over perhaps 10 - 30 years by accelerating
They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower
birth rates around the world, thereby reducing the world population
over successive generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more
acceptable to scientists who want to see the world population fall
but don't quite have the stomach to outright kill people with
conventional medicine. There is already evidence that
They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic.
Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a
deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high
fatality rate. This "bioweapon" approach could kill millions of
people whose immune systems have been weakened by previous vaccine
This is a known side effect of some vaccines, by the way. A study
documenting this was published in PLoS.
Read the story here.
Here's the study title and citation:
Does Seasonal Influenza
Vaccination Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1
Viboud C, Simonsen L (2010)
Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination
Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus?
PLoS Med 7(4): e1000259. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000259
The short answer is yes,
seasonal flu vaccines do cause increased
susceptibility to the H1N1 pandemic virus.
In other words, seasonal
flu vaccines could set up the population for a "hard kill" pandemic
that could wipe out a significant portion of the global population
(perhaps 10 to 15 percent, as Bill Gates suggested ).
Conveniently, their deaths could be blamed on the pandemic, thereby
diverting blame from those who were really responsible for the plot.
As yet another beneficial side effect for the global population
killers, the widespread deaths could be used as a fear tool to urge
more people to get vaccinated yet again, and the entire cycle could
be repeated until world population was brought down to whatever
manageable level was desired... all in the name of health care!
The more people around the world are vaccinated before the release
of the "hard kill" pandemic virus, the more powerful the effect of
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Perhaps not coincidentally, the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
has funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into vaccine programs
targeting people all over the world.
One such program is researching
the development of "sweat-triggered vaccines" that could use
specially-coated nano-materials to deliver vaccines to people
without using injections.
More interestingly, his foundation has also invested millions in
sterilization technologies that have been called a
It seems that the actions of the Gates foundation are entirely
consistent with the formula for CO2 reduction that Bill Gates eluded
his TED conference speech:
P x S x E x C
By reducing birth rates (through sterilization technologies) and
increasing vaccine penetration throughout the world population (by
using sweat-triggered nano-vaccines), his stated goal of
the world population by 10 to 15 percent could be reached within
just a few years.
Who will be left alive? The smart people
The interesting thing about all this is that this campaign to reduce
global population through vaccines will obviously not impact people
who consciously avoid vaccines.
And those people, by and large, tend
to be the more intelligent, capable people who actually have an
improved ability to move human civilization forward with thoughtful
I can only imagine that those people designing this vaccine-induced
population control measure might be sitting around a table chuckling
to themselves and saying,
"It's only the stupid people that are
going to be killed off anyway, so this is actually helping the
future of humankind!" (Their words, not mine.)
In a weird world government kind of way, this effort might actually
be based on some distorted vision of philanthropy where some of the
most powerful people in the world quite literally believe the way to
save humanity is to kill off as many of the gullible people as
Vaccines are, in effect, an "evil genius" kind of way to
conduct an IQ test on the population at large:
If you go get
vaccinated every flu season, you're not too bright and probably
don't engage the kind of strong mental faculties that humanity will
no doubt need if it is to face a future where it is now all but
obvious we are not alone in the universe.
If humanity is to save itself from its own destruction and compete
as an uplifted species in our universe, killing off the least
intelligent members of society (or making them infertile) may appear
to the world controllers to be a perfectly reasonable approach. I
disagree with that approach, but it may be precisely what they are
In any case, choosing to receive a seasonal flu shot is undoubtedly
an admission that you have failed some sort of universal IQ test,
whether or not this is the intention of world influencers such as
More importantly, it is also a betrayal of your own
biology, because it indicates you don't believe in the ability of
your own immune system to protect you even from mild infections.
Perhaps the world vaccine conspirators figure that if people are
willing to betray themselves anyway, it's not much different for
governments and institutions to betray them as well.
In other words,
if you don't even care enough about your own health to take care of
your health, why should any government care about protecting your
As you ponder this, also consider something else: The U.S. is going
broke due to sick-care costs which are rising dramatically under the
new federal health care reform guidelines.
Can you guess the fastest
and easiest way to reduce those health care costs?
If you guessed,
"unleash a hard-kill pandemic that takes out a significant portion
of the weak or sick people" then you guessed right.
off those most vulnerable to sickness could save the U.S. government
literally billions of dollars in sick-care expenditures. Plus, it
would save Social Security yet more billions by avoiding ongoing
(Again, I am completely against such an approach
because I value human life, but I also know we live in a world where
the people in charge have little or no respect for human life and
will readily sacrifice human lives to achieve their aims.)
As far as Bill Gates goes, consider his statement in the context of
what we've discussed here:
"The world today has 6.8 billion
people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really
great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health
services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."
It suddenly seems to make a lot of sense when you understand that
reducing the population reduces CO2 emissions, and using more
vaccines on more people increases the death rate of the population.
My advice? Try to avoid being among those 10 to 15 percent who get
culled through global vaccine programs.
You will not only save your
life, you'll also pass the "universal IQ test" which determines
whether you're smart enough to know that injecting your body with
chemicals and viral fragments in order to stop "seasonal flu" is a
Be healthy and wise, and you'll survive
the world depopulation
effort that victimizes conventional thinkers who don't have the
intelligence to question what they're being told to do by their own