July 23, 2008
from AmericanChineseMedicineAssociation Website
In 2005, Snow had his colon removed and underwent six months of chemotherapy after being diagnosed with colon cancer. Two years later (2007), Snow underwent surgery to remove a growth in his abdominal area, near the site of the original cancer.
But of course we now
know, Dr. Ocean was dead wrong.
In actual fact, the colon surgery severely restricted his normal eliminative functions, thereby overburdening the liver and tissue fluids with toxic waste. The previous series of chemo-treatments inflamed and irreversibly damaged a large number of cells in his body, and also impaired his immune system - a perfect recipe for growing new cancers.
Now unable to heal the
causes of the original cancer (in addition to the newly created
ones), Snow’s body developed new cancers in the liver and other
parts of the body.
If you are bitten by a
poisonous snake and don’t get an antidote for it, isn’t it likely
that your body becomes overwhelmed by the poison and, therefore,
cannot function anymore?
Did the cancer do all this to him? Certainly not. Cancer doesn’t do such a thing, but chemical poisoning does.
He actually looked more ill than someone who has been bitten by a poisonous snake.
The news is spreading fast that in the United States physician-caused fatalities now exceed 750,000 each year.
Perhaps, many doctors no longer trust in what they practice, for good reasons.
The research covered data from the Cancer Registry in Australia and the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results in the USA for the year 1998.
The current 5-year relative adult survival rate for cancer in Australia is over 60%, and no less than that in the USA. By comparison, a mere 2.3% contribution of chemotherapy to cancer survival does not justify the massive expense involved and the tremendous suffering patients experience because of severe, toxic side effects resulting from this treatment.
With a meager success rate of 2.3%, selling chemotherapy as a medical treatment (instead of a scam), is one of the greatest fraudulent acts ever committed. The average chemotherapy earns the medical establishment a whopping $300,000 to $1,000,000 each year, and has so far earned those who promote this pseudo-medication (poison) over 1 trillion dollars.
It’s no surprise that
the medical establishment tries to keep this scam alive for as long
He also reviewed and analyzed thousands of scientific articles published in the most prestigious medical journals.
It took Abel several years to collect and evaluate the data. Abel’s epidemiological study, which was published on August 10, 1991 in The Lancet,* should have alerted every doctor and cancer patient about the risks of one of the most common treatments used for cancer and other diseases. In his paper, Abel came to the conclusion that the overall success rate of chemotherapy was “appalling.”
* Note: it wasn’t published in 1991 but in 1992 and it wasn’t published in The Lancet but in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. See Chemotherapy of Advanced Epithelial Cancer - A Critical Review.
According to this report, there was no scientific evidence available in any existing study to show that chemotherapy can,
Abel points out that chemotherapy rarely improves the quality of life.
He describes chemotherapy as “a scientific wasteland” and states that even though there is no scientific evidence that chemotherapy works, neither doctor nor patient is willing to give up on it.
The mainstream media has never reported on this hugely important study, which is hardly surprising, given the enormous vested interests of the groups that sponsor the media, that is, the pharmaceutical companies. A recent search turned up exactly zero reviews of Abel’s work in American journals, even though it was published in 1990.
I believe this is not
because his work was unimportant - but because it is irrefutable.
Yet they claim chemotherapy to be an effective cancer treatment, and their unsuspecting patients believe that “effective” equals “cure.” The doctors, of course, refer to the FDA’s definition of an “effective” drug, one which achieves a 50% or more reduction in tumor size for 28 days. They neglect to tell their patients that there is no correlation whatsoever between shrinking tumors for 28 days and curing the cancer or extending life.
shrinkage through chemotherapy has never been shown to cure cancer
or to extend life. In other words, you can live with an untreated
tumor for just as long as you would with one that has been shrunken
or been eliminated by chemotherapy (or radiation).
By contrast, the body can still
cure itself, which it
actually tries to do by developing cancer. Cancer is more a healing
response than it is a disease. The “disease” is the body’s attempt
to cure itself of an existing imbalance. And sometimes, this healing
response continues even if a person is subjected to chemotherapy
(and/or radiation). Unfortunately, as the previously mentioned
research has demonstrated, the chances for a real cure are greatly
reduced when patients are treated with chemotherapy drugs.
Chemo-therapy can give the patient life-threatening mouth sores. It attacks the immune system by destroying billions of immune cells (white blood cells). Its deadly poisons inflame every part of the body.
The drugs can slough off the entire lining of their intestines. The most common side effect experienced among chemo patients is their complete lack of energy. The new additional drugs now given to many chemo patients may prevent the patient from noticing some of the side effects, but they hardly reduce the immensely destructive and suppressive effect of the chemotherapy itself.
Remember, the reason
chemotherapy can shrink some tumors is because it causes massive
destruction in the body.
You can literally feel
the energy being zapped from every cell of your body - a physical
death without dying. Chemo-caused fatigue has a negative impact on
day-to-day activities in 89% of all patients. With no energy, there
can be no joy and no hope, and all bodily functions become subdued.
All of this may explain why cancer patients who do not receive any treatment at all, have an up to four times higher remission rate than those who receive treatment. The sad thing is that chemotherapy does not cure 96% to 98% of all cancers anyway.
Conclusive evidence (for the majority of
cancers) that chemotherapy has any positive influence on survival or
quality of life does not exist.
As Abel’s research clearly demonstrated, there is no such evidence anywhere to be found in the medical literature.
Subjecting patients to chemotherapy robs them of a fair chance of finding or responding to a real cure and deserves criminal prosecution.