The Moon Shots Were
by Kevin Overstreet
Last Updated 1-26-99
My conspiracy theory for this report is
that we never went to the moon. The whole dang thing was faked. When
I had first heard of this idea, I though to my self that it was a
load of rubbish. "Of course we went to the moon" kept going through
I had first heard of this Idea from a
local Radio Talk Show,
Ground Zero, which plays every
Sunday night on KBER 101.1
They had brought up some interesting points, but I was not quite
sure that I believed them, so I have taken this opportunity to study
this Idea further. I am now convinced that we never landed on the
moon, and it is my hope, that I can make you question it yourself.
One thing that I would like to call to
attention, is that I am not an expert on anything that is written in
this report. I don't know much about camera's, or non-atmospheric
conditions, or physics or anything. I am just a senior in high
school, and about the only thing that I know professionally is how
to run movie projectors. I challenge all that read this page to find
something wrong with it, and tell me about it, so I can more
accurately disprove one of the most historical events of the
century..... The Landing on the Moon.
Lets Start off
with the pictures
Lets face it, there isn't really a heap-load of evidence that we
didn't go to the moon. Why would there be? NASA doesn't WANT
evidence that we went to the moon. NASA wants people not to ask
questions, and keep living their happy little lives. But here is
some evidence that you cannot argue with.
My theory is that the moon landing were
set on a sound stage, not in space.
(Perhaps an Air Force base near
San Bernardino, called Norton Air Force Base, where they have the
world's largest sound stages under tremendously efficient security).
On the moon, there is only one light
source, the sun. This is a shot of Buzz Aldrin and Neal Armstrong
planting the US flag on the moon. If the sun is the only light
source used by NASA on the moon, Aldrin's
A shadows should
not be so much longer than Armstrong's.
This is a famous picture labeled "Man on
the Moon" I have a poster of this picture hanging on my wall in my
room, and it always gives me a chuckle.
If you will look at area B you will notice a shadow cast across Buzz Aldrin's space suit. Once again, if the Sun is the only light source
used on the moon, this shadow would have been MUCH darker.
Looking at area C you will notice that the surface of the moon fades
off into the distance, then is met with the moon's horizon. In a
no-atmosphere environment, the ground shouldn't have faded out, but
stayed crystal sharp unto the moon's horizon.
Looking at area D you can plainly see some type of structure
reflected through Aldrin's helmet. I do not know what it is, but it
In this picture, taken from the LEM, you
can see at least two abnormalities. In section
E you see an abnormal
shadow on the moon's surface. NASA claims that this shadow is the
shadow cast by the Lunar Module, but on earth, even when aircraft is
flying low to the ground, it does not produce such a clearly defined
OK, here's the kicker... if you will look at section
3 you will
notice there are no stars in the sky. In fact, you will never see
any stars in any NASA Moon photographs, or hear an astronaut mention
anything about the glorious stars that are visible when out of the
If you look in areas
J , you will
again see no stars. In area K you will notice that one side of the LEM in covered in shadow, but somehow the symbol of the US flag in
This very well could have been a touch up job.
This is a picture of Alan Bean holding
up a Special Environmental Examiner Container. This picture was
taken off a camera that was strapped to Conrad's chest. If the
camera was attached to Conrad's chest, the top of Bean's helmet
should not be in this picture.
All of the shadows reflected in Bean's visor
M are going off in
separate directions, not in parallel lines like they should be.
If you will look at the Environmental sampler that Al Bean is
holding, N , the reflection is coming from a light source other than
the sun, but it is possible that light is being reflected off the
There is a strange anomaly in the sky
7 , it is yet to be determined
what that might be.
In our last picture, I would like to
direct your attention to the circled portion of the screen. These
Lunar Rover tracks are quite well defined, don't you agree?
the fact is, you need a mixture of a compound, and water, to make
such defined lines. I don't know if that idea is so convincing, but
I assure you, this next one is.
If you look at the rock labeled
R you will notice a letter
carved in the rock. Perhaps a gag left by the props department?
Here is a portion of the previous
picture, blown up. Take a look at the cross hairs that appear on the
picture. These hairs appear on EVERY lunar picture. These cross
hairs are placed between the shutter of the camera, and the film,
supposedly. If you take a look at the cross hair on the left, this
cross hair was placed behind the lunar rover, you can see the Lunar
Rover is in front of the cross hairs.
On with the Facts!!!
I tried to find a credible man to
get my facts from on this subject, and I found just that. The
following information came form Mr. Bill Kaysing, seven years
head of technical publications for the Rocketdyne Research
Department at the Propulsion Field Laboratory in the Simi Hills,
near Kenoga Park, California.
During this time as head of
technical publications for Rocketdyne, Mr. Kaysing had a Top
An average days temperature on the moon ranges from 260° F to 280°
F, too much for film to survive. At those temperatures, film crinkles up
into a ball.
About 20 miles about the Earth, there is a radiation belt named the
Van Allen belt. No human can get through this belt. If you try than
you get hit with 300+ rads of radiation. Unless they are surrounded
on each side by 4 feet on lead.
There are millions of micro-meteors traveling at speeds up to 6000
MPH, which would tear the ship to pieces.
If you look at the pictures/video of people on the moon, you will
never see more than 3 stars.
When the LEM set down on the Lunar surface, it gave out 3000 lb.
worth of thrust. This would have created a massive hole underneath
the Lunar Module, but in pictures of the Lunar Module, the ground
underneath is untouched.
But why would
they do it?
I have come up with three reasons
why NASA would fake a landing on
NASA gathered about 30 billion
dollars pretending to go to the moon. That means that
someone is getting a lot of money in their pockets.
If you ever saw the movie "Wag
the Dog", the president has sexual relations with a 12 year
old. This information goes out to the media 1 week before
elections. So, to get the publics mind off of the little
Girl, the president stages a war with Albania.
The moon shots were the same
concept. People did not like what was going on with the
Vietnam war, so, to get the publics mind off of all the bad
things going on in Vietnam, the US faked a moon landing. If
you check your dates, we abruptly stopped going to the moon
around the same time the Vietnam War Ended.
TO WIN THE SPACE RACE
Back in the late 60's early
70's, Russia and the US were in a heated battle to see,
well, pretty much who was better. Once the US realized that
they couldn't send a man to the moon, they couldn't just
say, "OK Russia, we give up."
Were The Moon
The "faked" Apollo landings
This article has been written to prove, once and for all, that we
are not being told the truth about the NASA film footage of the
Apollo missions. This will astound even the most hardened skeptic
and convince many people that the whole Apollo moon project of the
late 1950's and early 70's were a complete hoax. Video links are
provided so you can watch with your own eyes the "official NASA
footage" that proves that we really haven't been told the whole
The Apollo Moon Landings: Were They All a Hoax?
"... looks at the 'evidence' that the conspiracy theorists present
to prove their notion that NASA faked the whole thing, while at the
same time not actually being very good at it. Much of this
'evidence' is so transparently moronic you'll wonder just how anyone
More Faked Moon Landings
"However, here is some additional, and conclusive, evidence that we
uncovered ... ! The truth is somewhere out there, and is definitely
not on the Moon."
"At the dawn of the new millennium we should
recognize the major
technical achievements of the Apollo era or should we consider the
view that the Apollo missions were the largest hoax in history?
During the last few years I've read a great deal of literature about
the lunar landing and the theories that they may have been faked. I
have found that much of the evidence against the landings is full of
holes the size of the moon itself. However it's not just up to me!
Look at the evidence for and against and come to you own
Moon landing was fake
"28 000 km/h is not yet possible for 1 kg ... Space travel around
the Earth needs 28 000 km/h ... Conclusion: US space travel is fake
Did we land on the moon?
Its incredible to believe that
some people think we didn't land on
Irregularities involving moon landing.
Moon landing hoax
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon.
Why the Americans NEVER landed on the moon.
Were the moon landing shots faked?