Edgar Cayce, who was know as a healer and psychic, and also as the father of
holistic medicine, claimed that he was, in a former life, a citizen of
Cayce told of an advanced civilization, with all the inventions of
our modern day life including weapons of mass destruction. The most notable
weapon being the "death ray". Death rays came in all sizes, but a giant
death ray machine, which was the largest of all their weapons is said to be
the weapon that destroyed Atlantis. Cayce also predicted that the western
ridge of Atlantis would be discovered off the coast of the
In The 1960's a startling discovery was made in that same place. It was that
of an ancient roadway built out of large stones which was under the ocean
off the coast of Bimini. Could this be an ancient highway of Atlantis?
THE SCOTT STONES
The possible accuracy of Aaron Du Val’s claims about the "Scott Stones" near
Bimini certainly appears to fit this criteria quite nicely. If the
Cayce readings are correct, the sinking of the West Coast will rise this
area above sea level in due course, making the ruins much easier to explore.
Before Du Val, Charles Berlitz had already given pictorial and radar – based
evidence for submerged step pyramids, megalithic walls and walkways, as well
as a fantastic – sized tower, which Hermann believes to be the
Tower of Ilta
that is referred to in the Edgar Cayce readings.
The ruins of temples dated at 12,000 years old have been found near Bimini,
Bahamas. Preliminary analysis has revealed that the original structures,
although smaller in size than the
Great Pyramid of Giza, appear to have been
more advanced. Casing stones have been measured which are of the same unique
angle as those at the Great Pyramid.
The ruins are megalithic and bear a remarkable resemblance to ancient sites
in Egypt. So called "quarry marks" found in the Aswan quarries and also on
the Great Pyramid, itself, appear to be identical matches with those found
on the Bimini temple stones. Other characteristics closely match features at
megalithic sites in Peru, the Yucatan, Ireland and Scandinavia. The stones
are already drawing international attention and aggressive research and
analysis projects are being set up which hope to commence more involved
Analysis of these enigmatic ancient temples built near
Bimini over 12,000
years ago has only just begun. Although many maps of the heavenly realm
adorn various walls of these mysterious Bimini temples, there is an almost
complete lack of other markings. Of the limited glyphs that do exist,
however, several match those found in the famous Altamira Cave
(known as the Sistine Chapel of pre-history) in Spain
which contains the well-known bison painting. In addition, there are exact
orbital plots of the planets and what seem to have been intricate star
shafts, metal-coated walls, and intermingled stones of various colors.
(including red, white, and black.)
Preliminary analysis has revealed that the original structures, although
smaller in size, appear to have been more advanced than the Great Pyramid of Giza. Casing stones have been measured which are of the same unique angle as
those at the Great Pyramid.
Other characteristics either closely match or are identical to features at
megalithic sites in Peru, Mexico, the Yucatan, Ireland, and Scandinavia.
It appears that the most important or revered numbers associated with these
ruins were the numbers five and nine. These numbers were also of great
significance to the ancients of Egypt and Mesoamerica. Evidence indicates
that a "checkerboard" calculator system was being used. Examples of this
system were found on top of the Great Pyramid and were long used for
numerical calculations in Mesoamerica. This same checkerboard pattern shows
up on the lintel stones of temples built by Celts of Iberian origin. Also,
according to some astronomers, this pattern served as a calendar regulator
to measure the sunrise and sunset directions on solstices and equinoxes.
The major concern of the mysterious ancient civilization that produced these
heavenly maps seems to have been Saturn and Jupiter -- with the oldest
records reflecting and emphasis on Saturn.
The stones are already drawing international attention and aggressive
research and analysis projects are being set up which hope to commence more
involved investigations shortly. The unnamed discoverers have given the
temple ruins the title of "The Scott Stones" -- in honor of the Professor
who laid down the clues which made the discovery possible.
The exact location of the site is being withheld, for the present, until the
proper government officials and museums can be notified.
To begin with, the area in which they were built, geologists tell us, has
been underwater for about 12,000 years. There are also instances in which
lava has flowed in between some of the temple stones which may give
scientists an approximate date when submitted to testing. The antiquity of
the stones almost leaps out at you upon first glance. There are hollows
which have been left in certain broken stones which have undergone such an
extensive amount of crystal growth upon their inner surfaces that they now
look like the inside of a geode! In many cases, the cement that once held
the huge stones together is now completely crystallized. Even more telling
is the fact that, some of the massive granite blocks, themselves, now
exhibit significant portions which have metamorphosed over the ages to the
point where they are no longer even granite.
But perhaps, the most significant of all is the fact that organic matter has
been found within an hermetic seal; along with unrusted, worked iron. The
iron began to rust soon after the seal was opened, however; which would
indicate that the seal had prevented the entry of oxygen for thousands of
years. The organic matter was in pristine condition and should prove to be
an interesting target for dating procedures. Other hermetic seals, which
have yet to be opened, are known to exist, as well.
EXACTLY how old are the Scott Stones? will this ancient megalithic site be
one of the first to yield an accurate account of its true age? Did men work
iron before the Iron Age? We may soon know!
On the 23rd of September, 1998, by carefully following guidelines laid out
by Professor Scott, the explorers were finally able to vault a formidable
barrier, making it possible to begin deciphering an ancient form of writing
which apparently goes all the way back to Atlantis, itself! The explorers
say they are "thrilled, awed, and humbled" by the information they are
recovering. They warn, however, that there may be many who will see this
information as quite "shocking or up-setting."
The explorers also say that the unthinking and inconsiderate attitudes of
some, to both the relevance and the fragility of these discoveries (not to
mention the inevitable complications involved with governmental
entanglements) leave them little room to reveal much more at this time and
still insure the responsible protection of these sites. It is for this most
obvious reason that the exact location of both of these sites MUST, for the
time being, remain a secret; pending the institution of proper protection
and supervision. Until such time, the explorers who discovered these
matching sets of ancient records say they will continue to decode them and
leave the rash and irresponsible thrill-seekers to their frantic antics of
As progress continued in translating an ancient form of writing found in
Egypt, it was realized, to the surprise (and joy) of the explorers, that at
some point in time, a SIMILAR SET OF RECORDS had actually been carried to
the area of the Yucatan! A full explanation of how this was determined from
actual records in Egypt will have to wait. But the important news, for now,
is that by matching the available clues, the explorers were able to locate
(on the 23rd of October) a MATCHING SET OF RECORDS IN THE
YUCATAN AREA! This
latest find is very exciting; and the explorers say that as translations
continue, it may be possible to locate other sites with matching records, as
Records which have been translated, so far, deal with prophecy, historical
events, dimensional shifts in time, and the religion of Atlantis. It is
estimated that a full translation of records found, to date, could take
years to accomplish. But the fact that the very same information is found in
both hemispheres can only be seen as a RESOUNDING VERIFICATION as to the
authenticity and intention of these records.
According to the explorers, however, without the actual records which were
discovered at the Scott Stones site, these current researchers stand little
to no chance of being able to locate the Egyptian set of records which has
proven so helpful. Also, they say that without the Egyptian set of records,
it will be virtually impossible to locate the matching set of records in the
Yucatan area. The explorers explain that these three sets of records, though
NOT identical, ARE intricately and indisputably linked; and they DO
absolutely corroborate each other!! What's more, the explorers (although
independent and having no connections whatsoever with the A.R.E.) are saying
"It cannot even be debated (probably much to the rancor or chagrin of
some) that the actual INFORMATION contained in these records DOES
POSITIVELY CONFIRM things which Edgar Cayce supposedly saw, including:
startling new information concerning a predicted RETURN!"
Pyramid Found Under The Sea
SOURCE: Janet Ann Spencer extracts from "The Planetary Connections", British
Edition, distributed by Roger Brown of "Fountain Adelaide", Issue No. 6,
Newsweek reports the discovery of a pyramid under the Bermuda Triangle. "And
not, just any pyramid, sonar tracing has mapped the pyramid's outline, and
shows it rising to a height of some 780 feet from the otherwise flat ocean
floor 1,200 feet below the surface of the Atlantic.
The discovery was made and then confirmed by Captain Don Henry, who
discovered the puzzling phenomenon while making sonar tracings of the sea
floor in an area of the Atlantic between South Bimini Island and the north
end of the Cay Sal Bank. He was staggered when he realized that this
undersea pyramid was some three hundred feet higher than the Cheops Pyramid,
with a base of a thousand feet square.
Dr. J. Manson Valentine, anthropologist and zoologist at the Miami Museum of
Science, is convinced and points out that the area where the pyramid is
located was once dry sand. The area has long been suggested as the site of
Christopher Dunn reports - I was intrigued by this report and immediately
called DuVal to get more information. Surprised when DuVal answered the
phone, I was more surprised when he immediately recognized who I was, having
read my articles in Atlantis Rising and on the Internet. He stated
emphatically that the quarry marks he had witnessed on the stones were
identical to those I had taken in Egypt and published in my article. I asked
him if there was evidence of precision machining with small corner radii
where a tool was used. He responded that the radius on the stone he had seen
was larger than the one I had published. He told me about petal-shaped holes
that were drilled through 12 feet of granite. He claimed emphatically that
if I came to Florida, I wouldn't be disappointed. He said that if anyone
should view this site, I should. Upon further questioning he said that the
stones were not a part of a recognizable structure, and wouldn't answer when
asked if they were in their original location.
I asked DuVal where the site was located, but he refused to reveal its
whereabouts, saying that the site needed to be protected. He also wouldn't
tell me what kind of transportation I would take to get to the site. He did
say that people have not recognized it for what it truly is. I told him I
couldn't make it to his conference on July 25th, because I was moving into a
new house. I told him I could probably make it at an earlier date.
After e-mailing the information to
Atlantis Rising editor Doug Kenyon, I
followed up with a telephone call. We both agreed that if DuVal's analysis
of the site could be verified, it might indeed be a remarkable discovery.
Doug had already talked to DuVal and, while keeping an open mind, he had his
own reservations. He then told me about Richard Wingate, another researcher,
and friend of his, who had worked in that area. One premise put forward by
Wingate was that the Moselle Shoals (formerly the
Moselle Reef) near Bimini are the ruins of a prehistoric structure. Many of the blocks of stone that
make up the First Street Jetty and others in Miami were taken from the Moselle Reef and brought over on barges in the 1920s. In support of his
premise that these are the stones of Atlantis, Wingate described
petal-shaped holes drilled through 12 feet of granite, a feat that he says
would require sonic drills.
Even though skeptical of DuVal, I was mindful of the experience I had while
in Egypt in 1995. I came across and was able to inspect evidence of advanced
methods of machining granite. The item I studied on the Giza Plateau had
been overlooked for centuries, with thousands of tourists passing it by.
Doug and I agreed that it may be worth checking out, and if I was shown an
ancient artifact that was identified as being 12,000 years old with the same
precision as the stones in Egypt, then we may have indications of a
prehistoric advanced culture. We were both exceedingly curious, but
suspicious that DuVal's discovery was actually the jetties in Miami.
On July 13 I received the following e-mail from DuVal.
Mr. Dunn, We have decided that it would be good for you to see the
Stones right away. We would be most pleased to spend 2 - 3 days in showing
them to you, if that would give you enough time to get the pictures and
measurements you might need. The best time for us would be anytime between
15 July and 21 July. Please make a short call to us, if this might be
suitable for you. Or e-mail us if you would like to set a different
Thank you for your interest in this matter, Aaron Du Val.
When I called DuVal again, he extended his hospitality and offered
accommodation if I would come to Miami. He stated emphatically that I would
not be disappointed by what I saw. The following day, Tuesday, July 15th, I
booked a flight to Miami for July 18th and called DuVal with my arrival
time. He promised to pick me up at the airport.
We then talked further about the site and I told him I was going to write an
article for Atlantis Rising on my visit. He said that they would probably
reveal the location of the site at the conference, because once the
photographs and video were shown, the site might be recognized. I asked if
the site was on the mainland. He didn't answer. I asked him if the site was
indeed one of the jetties in Miami, and described to him Richard Wingate's
research. Again there was silence. He wanted me to promise two things: that
I would not reveal the location of the site and that credit for the
discovery of the site would go to Professor Scott, who laid the groundwork
for their discovery. I assured him that I would not reveal the location of
any site he showed me that had not been similarly identified in the past and
that credit would most certainly go where it is deserved.
On July 16, 1997, at 10:30 P.M. I received a call from DuVal. He nervously
apologized and informed me that he couldn't show me the site as planned. I
told him I had already bought the plane ticket and on such short notice I
couldn't get a refund. He indicated that he would reimburse me and asked how
much it was. He gulped when I told him and said he would send me an e-mail
the following day.
Needless to say, I received no e-mail or reimbursement, but I did have an
enjoyable weekend in Miami. I spent quite a bit of time clambering over the
rocks in the Miami jetties seeking evidence of advanced machining
technology. I know there are people who would like to believe that
eventually some hard evidence would be found to support Edgar Cayce's
prediction that Atlantis would be found in the Bahamas, but I couldn't find
Interestingly, on this great Atlantean caper, I did locate much of what
Mr. DuVal describes in his several press releases. The concrete curbs taken from
the streets and thrown on the jetty were made up of red and white concrete.
They also had the large radius that DuVal described. One large piece of
concrete had a piece of steel running through a channel. There were many
blocks of granite that had intriguing hole patterns drilled into them. I
suppose with a little imagination, one could make something of them. I was
looking for precision, and couldn't find it. The quarry marks were nothing
like the quarry marks found in Egypt.
I stopped in the Miami Museum on the way back from Coral Castle in
Homestead, and learned that the Egyptology Society was indeed scheduled to
give a presentation on July 25th. I also learned that they are not
affiliated with the museum as Mr. DuVal claimed, but meet periodically in
Just as anyone can rent a hall, anyone can publish on the Internet. All you
need is a PC, a modem, access to an Internet service and, suddenly, you are
an instant author! Is this a bad thing? Not necessarily, as it allows for
greater freedom of expression. With this freedom, though, comes
responsibility. We are responsible for how we influence others, as well as
how we permit ourselves to be influenced. Obviously, after this experience,
our major concern should be how other authors influence us.
The Egyptology Society of Miami still has not presented their findings to
the public. Their originally scheduled date of July 25, 1997, was, to the
disappointment of attendees, rescheduled for August 8, 1997. On September
27, 1997 DuVal apologized for treating me rudely and told me that they are
waiting for lab results before revealing anything to the public, expressing,
again, a concern for the protection of the site. Given that I specifically
gave DuVal the opportunity to deny that the site was the jetties in Miami
and he didn't, I can only conclude, by what I have observed, and given the
circumstances leading up to my observations, that this may be the case.
If my assumptions are incorrect, Doug Kenyon, I'm sure, will give him some
space and the opportunity to identify the correct site so that his claims
can be checked and verified.
Let's not forget the story about the boy who cried wolf. Unsubstantiated
reports such as these can harm serious researchers who accept the evidence
that prove advanced civilizations existed in prehistory. They tend to muddy
the water and give strength to the orthodox status quo.