Obviously, ET contact, in full public view vs. the public "disclosure" that aliens have been watching human behavior for a LONG time - are two very different things.
Of course, disclosing the presence of ET visitors would be an interesting development, assuming the event was real and not some contrived hoax. But let's face it, what do we know about ET's?
For example, what do they think - if anything - about our controllers organized criminal behavior?
Before I go on here it might be useful to state part of Abraham Lincoln's last sentence in his Gettysburg Address:
Note that Lincoln's words might not only imply that freedom was under attack (probably always was) but that it could perish from the Earth!
Perhaps not a surprise either, as
historically speaking, freedom had yet to be very well established.
Today, many people will tell us freedom has already perished.
Considering the events following
9/11, many consider it a done deal.
Who will fight to restore all that has been taken away?
Unknown to many, the nineteenth century reporting of mysterious flying objects, many reported as today, were seen in the time that Lincoln was in Washington. It is likely that Lincoln would have been briefed or had knowledge of these reports, as President, in my opinion.
Did Lincoln have any concerns that freedom could also perish from Earth by intervention from elsewhere? It has been suggested that if aliens really cared that we are trashing the planet's environment, why don't they stop us?
It has also been suggested, by some, that if aliens really wanted to destroy us or openly take over, they could have done so a long time ago. Since we apparently haven't experienced any significant open help or hostility, perhaps we should be considering if some ET's could be operating from a covert place - not to help or free us from our economic bondage - but to allow the attacks against freedom to continue?
Some might say this is all nonsense and
what has been invading our air spaces is something other than off
planet intelligences. However, based on what we know, this is a very
I don't know about you, but I have a
real hard time visualizing the President making this speech. But who
knows, maybe when he accepts his Nobel Peace Prize in December, he
will lay it on us.
I even wonder if I could be open to physical, eye to eye contact, with (hopefully) friendly ET's. (But this could be interesting, if one had the courage, to ask how high up are we on their agenda list! Could we bear to hear the answer?)
Others might say... if a contact event didn't come along with a great hope and commitment for ending our controllers endless economic use and abuse, what would be the point? (Not to mention their endless wars that continue to sabotage our collective prosperity.)
I don't know... maybe we should be seeking a friendly ET contact event since it might be impossible for us to ever break away from our controller's economic stranglehold.
Many of us have realized that our world leaders are now in serious damage control mode of operation. They know, that we know, they are responsible for allowing the looting of the world economy.
Of course they are hoping the people will forget about their crimes after they re-inflate their phony economic system - at our expense, again.
And, we have all witnessed the many ways our controllers have been trying to "help" us with the likes of global warming money scams, corporate take over's, trillions of dollars in "bankster" bailouts and finally, empty promises to end wars and the murder of millions innocent people which always goes along with these wars.
Problem is... a lot more people are not buying this stuff anymore.
So, if they fail to re-inflate the world
economy, and the "natives" get REALLY restless, they might want to
disclose that there are some unfriendly ET's out there. Thus,
the imminent disclosure of friendly aliens, all things
(economically) considered, might be a stretch at the present point
We know this stuff is out there
because many of us have witnessed it invading our air spaces!
"Physics Truth Embargo"?
from CheckTheEvidence Website
Such a goal is certainly worthy of great interest but its "pre-occupation", in my opinion, tends to somewhat overlook a far more serious concern. This concern is what I will refer to here as a Physics Truth Embargo. The hope that disclosure will help in releasing covered up technology is not a new one, but what I will be discussing here is even more disturbing if that's possible.
So, in pursuing this line of thought I would like to speculate, some, about the concept that aliens are not only monitoring us (the UFO aspect) but are also actively interacting with some of us (the exopolitics aspect of so-called secret agreements) by asking some rather provocative questions.
(Note: Obviously, such advanced
technology, which we know must be out there, could be a tremendous
boost for our struggling race. Why would our leaders not share such
knowledge with the public sector?)
As I have mentioned to some people before, apparently any useful experimental input for theoretical particle physics ended over 20 years ago.
How is that?
Well, in an April 1988 Physics Today article, 'Flavor SU(3) Symmetries in Particle Physics', physicist Howard Georgi laments that the "healthy situation" of required experimental input "has changed in recent years". (Really?)
Twenty years later, we find the same concern stated by Peter Woit in his 2006 book, 'Not Even Wrong: The failure of string theory and the search for unity in physical law'.
(Note: Many physicists think string theory is a waste of time and money. I think it may be something even worse - like a distraction to mislead the public that we are getting honest science.)
In his book, Woit also laments the "lack of useful" experimental input and states the traditional system is now "seriously dysfunctional".
The shutting down of cold fusion research, which was generating interesting experimental input, was and still is highly suspicious.
Unfortunately, I think it is quite likely that we are not dealing with a full deck of cards here and our controllers have no intentions of ever showing us the missing cards. Unfortunately, few understand how and why mainstream science can shut down some interesting science research.
Someone I know, about ten years ago, made a suggestion.
This is of course quite profound as we are only free, I think, in the sense of how much truth we personally find. (And it's been increasingly clear lately that our controllers don't want us to find too much truth about anything!)
True, disclosure of the 60+ year old, worldwide cover up of an alien presence, assuming the disclosure is not some contrived hoax, would be very important.
But would it be huge if the aliens still maintain their distance?
In fact, it might be quite anti-climatic
for some if it turns out the aliens have the final say as to when,
if ever, the public sector of this world sees ultra advanced
propulsion and free energy physics and the associated technology.