by Jon Rappoport
Jon Rappoport, author of
three explosive collections,
THE MATRIX REVEALED,
EXIT FROM THE MATRIX,
POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX.
Jon was a candidate for a
US Congressional seat
in the 29th
District of California.
He maintains a consulting
practice for private clients, the purpose of which is
the expansion of personal creative power.
Nominated for a Pulitzer
Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30
years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and
health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine,
Stern, and other newspapers and magazines
in the US and Europe.
Jon has delivered lectures
and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and
creative power to audiences
around the world.
Brand new elite
smashes global warming science.
Awarded climate medal by Obama,
now he finds enormous fraud and
Memo to President Trump and Steve Bannon:
Here it is. Set the table, put
the napkins in your lap
and feast on this revelation.
A highly respected, medal-winning climate scientist just wound up
and threw a giant monkey wrench into global warming science.
That study, pretending
warming had never stopped, was timed to help negotiating nations at
the Climate Summit in Paris. It was timed to help them enact
draconian economic measures to reduce warming.
But, Bates reveals, that study was cooked on several counts.
It was such a mess no
self-respecting scientist would sign on to it. However, scientists
did sign on to it. And a prestigious journal, Science,
Apparently, the brains at
Science were on vacation...
Or they were determined
to play ball and assist the Globalist plan to drastically reduce CO2-producing
energy production in nations across the globe, thus escalating
poverty, in order to "save us" all from frying.
Here are choice quotes from David Rose's exclusive
Daily Mail article that exposes the
"The Mail on Sunday
today reveals astonishing evidence that the organization that is
the world's leading source of climate data rushed to publish a
landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to
influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change."
"A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that
America's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published
the sensational but flawed [fraudulent] report, aimed at making
the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack
Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference
in Paris in 2015."
"The [fraudulent] report claimed that the 'pause' or 'slowdown'
in global warming in the period since 1998 - revealed by UN
scientists in 2013 - never existed, and that world temperatures
had been rising faster than scientists expected.
Launched by NOAA with
a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world's
media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers."
"But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA
scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on
Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on
misleading, 'unverified' data."
"It was never subjected to NOAA's rigorous internal evaluation
process - which Dr Bates devised."
"His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data
were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a
'blatant attempt to intensify the impact' of what became known
as the [fraudulent] Pausebuster paper."
"His disclosures are likely to stiffen President Trump's
determination to enact his pledges to reverse his predecessor's
'green' policies, and to withdraw from the Paris deal - so
triggering an intense political row."
"In an exclusive interview, Dr Bates accused the lead author of
the paper, Thomas Karl, who was until last year director
of the NOAA section that produces climate data - the National
Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) - of,
decisions and scientific choices that maximized warming and
minimized documentation… in an effort to discredit the
notion of a global warming pause, rushed so that he could
time publication to influence national and international
deliberations on climate policy'."
"Both datasets [used
in the fraudulent study] were flawed.
This newspaper has
learnt that NOAA has now decided that the sea dataset will have
to be replaced and substantially revised just 18 months after it
was issued, because it used unreliable methods which overstated
the speed of warming.
The revised data will
show both lower temperatures and a slower rate in the recent
"The land temperature dataset used by the study was afflicted by
devastating bugs in its software that rendered its findings
"The paper [fraudulent study] relied on a preliminary, 'alpha'
version of the data which was never approved or verified."
"None of the data on which the paper was based was properly
'archived' - a mandatory requirement meant to ensure that raw
data and the software used to process it is accessible to other
scientists, so they can verify NOAA results."
"Dr Bates retired from NOAA at the end of last year after a
40-year career in meteorology and climate science.
As recently as 2014,
the Obama administration awarded him a special gold medal for
his work in setting new, supposedly binding standards 'to
produce and preserve climate data records'."
"Yet when it came to the paper timed to influence the Paris
conference, Dr Bates said, these standards were flagrantly
"The [fraudulent] paper was published in June 2015 by the
journal Science. Entitled 'Possible artifacts of data biases in
the recent global surface warming hiatus', the document said the
widely reported [warming] 'pause' or 'slowdown' was a myth."
"But Dr Bates said this increase in temperatures was achieved by
dubious means. Its key error was an upwards 'adjustment' of
readings from fixed and floating buoys, which are generally
reliable, to bring them into line with readings from a much more
doubtful source - water taken in by ships.
This, Dr Bates
explained, has long been known to be questionable:
themselves sources of heat, readings will vary from ship to
ship, and the depth of water intake will vary according to
how heavily a ship is laden - so affecting temperature
"Dr Bates said:
'They had good
data from buoys. And they threw it out and "corrected" it by
using the bad data from ships. You never change good data to
agree with bad, but that's what they did - so as to make it
look as if the sea was warmer'."
software [used in the fraudulent study] was afflicted by serious
bugs. They caused it to become so 'unstable' that every time the
raw temperature readings were run through the computer, it gave
"Dr Bates revealed that the failure to archive and make
available fully documented data not only violated NOAA rules,
but also those set down by Science.
Before he retired
last year, he continued to raise the issue internally.
Then came the final
Dr Bates said:
'I learned that
the computer used to process the software had suffered a
"The reason for the
failure is unknown, but it means the [fraudulent]
Pausebuster paper can never be replicated or verified by other
Get it? Fraud all the way
along the line. And a cover-up, to make an examination of the
fraud-details impossible. The perfect worst-case scenario.
Can we now, at last, have a few criminal indictments?
Even a prosecuting attorney fresh out of law school, wet behind the
ears, with zero courtroom experience, would be able to secure a
"Ladies and gentlemen
of the jury, imagine this.
powers-that-be want to cut the
production of energy in this country. Anyone can see the result
of such a plan. We all become strapped. We all become poorer.
But we're told this is necessary to save us from the
destruction of life on Earth.
We're told we have to
go along with the plan, because producing energy releases carbon
dioxide, which in turn keeps raising the temperature of the
Recently, a key
scientific study was published, and this study bolsters the
whole idea that global warming is on the rise.
But a key expert
insider will show that this study was false and a fraud and a
lie, and the people who wrote it are guilty of deceiving you and
me and everyone.
Find these people
guilty, once and for all, and send them to prison, where they
I could try this case in
court. You could try this case in court. Three guys in a bar could
try this case. And win...
Are you ready, Mr. Trump? Send out the hounds from the
Department of Justice and put these liars under arrest. And let's
see their trial in open court, every minute of it, on camera, on
Let's see it in New York and Chicago and Los Angeles and Toronto and
London and Paris and Rome and Kabul and Tehran and Sydney and Tokyo
and Rio and Durban and Nuuk and Tierra del Fuego…
At long last, put official science and its enablers in the dock...