Many of you have probably heard that
our planet is about to advance from "3rd density" to "4th
density". So what is this "density" about? Density in our
special context doesn't stand for inertia or opacity in the
normal physical sense, but "Density" corresponds with subtlety,
especially in its psychic sense (i.e. perceptual or cognitive
"Third density" (the one we are
presently experiencing) tells you that things (objects) are
fixed and solid; 4th density allows us to perceive such
"solidity" as an energetic kind of fluid/kaleidoscopic
"coagulation"; 5th density allows us to behold all things,
whether apparently "solid" or not, as coordinative fields of
geometrized light networks; 6th density tends toward direct
knowledge of such light-composites as self-luminous idea, and
therefore as -themselves- ideoform patterns of the
permissive cognitive grid-network.
As you can see from the "UFOS,
Channeling, and the positive and negative Realms of this World"
texts, living and conscious beings exist in all dimensions,
either positively or negatively oriented.
Each such density level carries as its chief importance a
reigning quotient of allowable insight, or intuition, with
respect to reality as a whole; this quotient correlates with the
compositional quality cited above.
One thing remarkable and noteworthy about this "density"
concept, is, that the difference between the "good guys" and the
"bad guys" in higher densities becomes ever larger. The "Good
Guys" in higher densities are supposed to be really extremely
benevolent, whereupon the "bad guys" in higher densities are
true personifications of cosmic evil itself, with
ultimately one evil hierophant (known as Satan) on
the top. Bad guys in higher densities prefer consciously (and
have freely chosen to prefer) to play dominion and
enslavement-based "games", and they tend to organize themselves
in a military hierarchy with a very strict pecking-order.
We will need this concept of "densities" and what is
going on there, to fight against some distortive and
misleading New-Age paradigms currently running amok in
the New Age society.
Why You Don't Create Your Own
an antidote to fatuous New Age
A paradigm that is currently running amok through the New Age
community, and which is depriving them of their last bit of
common sense, is better known as "You
Create Your Own Reality" (short: YCYOR). This
insidious half-truth is usually placed into a very misleading
context and is never completely true.
Let us just look at some basic facts that we can derive "if"
YCYOR would be completely true:
1.) Every war victim, or
rape victim, etc. must have "wanted" to draw whatever
misfortune upon itself, since that victim "created his own
Common sense tells us here, that this is nonsense, and that
not all war victims, etc. ever wanted to happen that war to
them. For me, common sense simply wins, and cuts a long
2.) We would live in a solipsistic universe wherein
we could do whatever we wanted without further consequences.
But pretty much obviously, we do
not live in such an utopian universe, and no, even on higher
densities, there is no such universe.
What makes the YCYOR
evangelist fatuous (rather than a demonstrable God of the
most egregious solipsism) is precisely the fact that all such
"personal decreeing", "positive thinking" and confident
imagining takes place in an inevitable context. There are
implications! There are repercussions ! No one decrees in a
personal or private, solipsistic vacuum. There is a variegated
World of myriad "pulls" and "claims" coexisting along with the
private desires and designs of the given ego-subject.
But "so what?" we hear the die-hard "reality-creator"
claim—"don't we remain untouched by those 'co-existents' as long
as we keep secure in the confidence of our own private
deservedness, our own authoritative affirmations and specific
commissions of positive thought-reinforcement?"
Report To The Commissioner
No. Man does not live by "commission" alone. This is why you do
not create your own reality, but merely generate
reality-hypotheses or scenarios which are continuously reflected
and tested against the Whole; and the Whole, being inseparable
from the Potential of your own innate-global Being, is
constituted by the explicit and implicit alike, by that which is
produced through active or positive commission and that which
results from the gaps, blind-spots and vacuums of interpretive
omission. All the lines, potential and actual, exist within
one's being and are inevitably calculated into the total
account! This is what it means when we say there's a context in
which all our desire-formulation and "decreeing" takes place.
This is a Deity-centered reality, not an ego-centered
reality. Only the totality of the soul-nature is in touch with
the Totality of Spirit-being. Anything else necessarily involves
a partial perspective, a conceptual self-estimation producing
inevitable blindspots, negatively-recessed lacunae as well as
"positive" outlines to be filled in obligingly by experience.
What you have selectively omitted from "your reality", is
manifested as well! Gaps in thinking and experience which
develop one "side" at the expense of the other, or which
temporarily prevent a latent potential of certain centers or
combinations of centers from being realized, do not simply "pass
by" as a domain of non-experience. They aren't just quietly
tucked away as surplus "potential" with which you're not obliged
to have any relation.
On the contrary, such gaps show up; they manifest in the
unstoppable/inexplicable erosion of all those things you've
materialized as expression of "personal preference".
MATRIX, Topper Style
in a nutshell
To even try to start explaining, you have to understand (or
believe, for that simplified matter in this special case) that
what you know about "thinking" is most likely wholly untrue,
or at least very defective.
Most people feel that they think with their brain, and nothing
else is involved. This is the first, and biggest illusion.
Topper explains, or try to explain, that thinking is a
function of your multidimensional "whole", your "whole"
being/field, not just tiny fragments of it.
How can we understand this ?
We can understand this when we consider people who have the
exceptionally rare faculty of aura-reading and who can
see chakras. The better ones of them could probably tell you
they can see your thoughts "arising", and they're not kidding -
it's taken to be literal. They see something like a sea
of astral stuff swimming in your stomach. Your intent wanders
around and picks up some of the astral particles from that area,
brings it up the spine to the brain, and "then" you think of it
as "your" thought. In other words these astral particles
that make up your thought are not exclusively hovering around
your brain. They most likely come from "any place" of your body,
and when you notice them, you're seeing the end product of a
long process already.
A long process, that is to say, which involves a lot of
filtering. What we're being faced here with is a complex system
of chakras that "filter out" certain "frequencies" as it were,
and "filters IN" certain other frequencies. This is equal to
"locking out" something that our body actually has the
possibility of recognizing.
Topper goes into incredible details when it comes to
describing the various energy streams inside our body
that actually shape what part of the "whole" reality we "can"
perceive, and what part we can not perceive.
He identified the most important of the details as the
Kundalini. This energy, which is encoiled at the base of the
spine, turns inside-out some "energies" (let's keep it simple)
so that we tend to "lock in" our "biomechanical features" of
"sweat and brow" and tend to "lock out" the perception of
spirits, ghosts, telekinesis and "higher psychic stuff".
That locking-out serves a purpose however. The most
important purpose is to actually identify us "only" with the
body. The fixation of identity to the "rigid" form of the
body, combined with the lack of psychic perception forces us to
push forward our development ourselves, independent of "psychic"
powers. Topper mentions there "was" an edenic state of "adam
and eve in paradise". You can compare this state with what you
probably know about sorcerers of the "Carlos
Castaneda" type, where no barrier is too hard to
pierce and no distance to great to seal.
That edenic scenario was unsatisfactory, in some way,
because it didn't supply sufficient pressure to provoke
development - to be more precise, the development of choice.
Whatever "paradise" must have been, it was definitely like a
limitless unity that sustained all the creatures, thus in effect
nullifying the need for any choice.
"Development" in such a context proves to be agonizingly
slow, if at all.
Thus, to raise the "desire" of one's consciousness past
the easy venue of paradise, there was a sort of "adversarial"
factor incorporated in the dimension known as the "world you
The "locking-in" was achieved by subtraction of certain
energy-values from overt recognition into the kundalini
"It's as if selected features of
the whole briny deep were washed ashore and stranded, there,
at low tide, so as to filter them from their teeming
The "descent" of the "serpent-force"
proffers a kind of temptation. The nature of such a
"temptation" is precisely to accept the part for the whole
(remember what I've told you about "thoughts arising only in
the brain?"), to focus down upon an
instrumentally-restricted field of perception through
stylistically delimiting coordinates and "lock in" the whole
value of consciousness (through which any such field complexly
polarizes) to an objectively triangulated "model" of the
How does the illusion - produced by
the kundalini - feel like?
"The mental and noetic -
or ideative - character of being seems internalized
and invisible, insubstantial and purely "subjective", while
the resistive inertia and opacity of "physicalized"
existence seems self-evidently real and objective,
descriptively exterior, and "up front".
All this and more, because we
identify "so strong" with the "fact" that we are only "the body"
we know - in Topper's words - we have "committed the force of
identity in that delimited form, on delimiting terms".
Removing these old identifications however, is not
everything that has to be done. The current "energy-currents"
running through our body play a huge part too in that falsifying
identity-equation - thus, they have to be modified.
They can be modified, we're being informed, by yogic exercises
of breathing, especially when these yogic exercises grow
into a daily routine of habit - because habit is exactly
the "stuff" that can form (impress on) the "wax-seal-like"
So there: Before you're off changing belief filters, you have to
change the intensification in your breathing-patterns, at least
habitually, to pass through the "veil" and out of the "matrix".
It is only then and there, that you can - and may - ask the
you really are", because only there your Higher
Self can answer it. This does involve work (to align your
energy systems) - "non-following" like Krishnamurti doesn't do,
since "complete relaxation" is, for normal 3rd density beings, a
authorization for "sleep".
"Rather than settling into
non-oscillatory alignment with Whole-being value, the force
of 3rd density consciousness simply relinquishes "any effort
whatsoever" to hold it and, like molasses, flows
compulsively back into its ordinary forms of regular,
imbalanced and highly inertial identity-commitments."
The only solution are proper
exercises of yogic breathing with intent
and will, before even asking the crucial question "Who I
"Thus, thinking must continue in
"accompaniment" of an intensified form of awareness, but
through a medium of cognition coordinatively aligned in such
a way as to furnish a denser/richer field of potentiated
This - hopefully - explains well
enough what's wrong with us as well as what we can do about it:
Hyperventilate, with several "relaxing" breaths in
between, for prolonged times, and make it a habit, until the
kundalini wax seal spontaneously erupts higher-psychic
impulses; then, and only then, try to hold this "new" and
"unknown" state of being. Maybe with some extra breaths till
your chakras drop off.
Every seeker somewhat has to ask
the question: What is God?
Let's just grant the theorem that a God indeed, exists,
it's heyday and say it's for granted that He really
exists, then we necessarily have to ask the question:
"What conditions must be met -
what properties must It have - to speak of IT as being
In other words: What are God's
One thing is clear: There can be only one God. Thus, we
have arrived at God's most easily noticeable attribute:
Oneness. Oneness with God is what every seeker seeks. When we
posit there can only be one God, we're being faced
with a sort of absolutism: i.e. we can easily derive:
"God must be an
This should be also pretty apparent,
since obviously, God cannot simply "fade away", "die", or
whatever else. It is that which was, which is, and which always
will be. This also means, it can't be something limited.
We already can sum up our theorem about God:
It is One (never-ending)
Infinity - beyond Time and Space but most likely regulating
One little attribute is still
missing, but we can easily derive it from the fact that millions
of people are praying to God every day. If prayer is somehow to
work, and communication with God is really possible, then
we can logically deduct that God is an intelligent entity.
Thus we arrive at Topper's definition of God,
which coincides with
the RA material: One
Whatever God is, it is limitless, absolute, and
Further attributes that we can logically conclude are: It is
self-congruent with itself to the infinite degree ; and - if it
has an identity - it is self-ident to itself to the infinite
Now we ask: What object is it, that is infinite,
self-conformant, and self-congruent plus self-ident with itself
to the infinite degree? And intelligent?
Pretty soon our list of possible objects is exhausted and we
arrive at the only possibility: Void.
Only Void can answer the question that it is infinite and
self-conformant to the infinite degree.
So... ah.... have we suddenly plunged into nihilism? Doom and
No... we haven't... yet. And we won't, at all!
But to explain that I'll have to strain your attention span a
little bit, for it might quite take a while. If we consult, for
example, particle physicists on the matter of void i.e.
zero-point energy, we are being informed that even the most
empty vacuum seems to contain something! That something
is labeled "hypothetical particles" or "zero-point
energy" sometimes (depending on your physical
background) but, anyhow, no matter how empty a vacuum is, it
still contains hypothetical but measurable virtual particles.
Zero-Point engineers like
Thomas Bearden even know
that these "hypothetical" particles can be transformed in order
to power and drive a free-energy device.
Tesla freaks will
also nod in knowledge what I'm talking about.
Thus, we are being faced with a Void, that is not a
simple nothingness, but "there's something". It is filled with
Consciousness no matter how "empty" from the
3rd-dimensional state of view.
Remember the good old classic way to meditate? *EMPTY* your
mind! And suddenly out of the emptiness there is not a
nothingness but, as a seasoned meditationer (monk) might tell
you, a fullness!
In Topper's words: "The void is not a simple nothingness, but a
So, we're being faced with the fact, -paradox sounding as it
might be- that it's precisely the void in the middle of
everything that is not only "driving" these free-energy
machines, but the rest of the universe on top of it. Ah!
When we ask how this may be, we can only explain that the only
"trick" an unlimited being can do, is precisely to discover the
"curious possibility" of limitation.
The only thing an "unqualified absolute" can do - is: qualify!
So, the first idea of unlimited, intelligent infinity
was the discovering of limitation. This is how the "big
Can we picture this scenario?
We can. The infinite space can be likened to the Void -
it's God-mind, being intelligent, echoing forward the
words "I am". However, it dawns to intelligent infinity that
there is the possibility of a point - an infinitely small dot,
thus, because of being infinitely small, "smearing" over the
whole infinity. Oops!
Whatever God thinks, it's
immediately there. And now, the point is echoing - through it's
"smearing" all over the place - the words: "I am not", since,
being infinitely small, a point sums up everything about the
self-referencing paradox in the style of "This sentence is
The point succeeds in emulating the infinite homogeneity and
congruence of the infinite intelligence, but on delimited terms;
— terms that cannot be resolved by normal "cartesian“ logic.
Thus, God's motto is: "Infinite self-congruence and
self-consistence even under all conditions".
Lucifer, the point: "Infinite self-congruence and
self-consistence on delimited terms".
Since the point, Lucifer, succeeds in emulating the
infinite self-consistence and congruence of intelligent infinity,
his claims are valid (on delimited terms, however). This
is how he borrows everything (everything that is limited, that
is) from the Void. But since it's borrowed, it'll have to
return to the owner somehow.
This is how, despite we have a very large universe, everything
and everyone that is limited has to die, i.e., has to face
limitation: Stars, star systems, planets, plants, and humans.
Even Time itself is limited and moves in a circular (to
be precise: spiral) motion.
The universe, thus, appears to be the result of a mind war, of
the two "adversaries":
"Infinite congruence... even
under all conditions", and "infinite congruence.... on
If that is all too sad, we haven't
yet asked another question: Could there exist a state wherein
the "two" statements are blending into "one"?
If there's a state like that, then it's like "Infinite
congruence... not only on limited terms but sustained and
approved by infinity as well".
Yes, we posit the existence of a state like that in here - it's
better known as "nirvana", or, more properly "samadhi"
perhaps, and this state has got everything to do with the sacred
Phi ratio. For, if such a state exists, then surely the
"greater" (God-mind, affirmative) would allow and
accommodate the "lesser" (denial). Such a beautiful state can
only yield to oneness - infinite oneness - when, on limited
mathematical terms :
a/b = 1:1.6180339 = b/(a+b)
Phi ratio, no matter how "large" or "small" the values for A
and B are, yields to infinite oneness, i.e. infinity itself.
With respect to the proportional relation of "sympathetical" and
"parasympathetical" nerve-systems, this gives us the optimum
ratio between the "two" nerve systems - an optimum that is
beyond either incessant flux (maximum sympathetical
nerve system activation) or static equilibrium of
sensory current withdrawal (maximum parasympathetical nerve
system activation). It gives the Symmetric void resolution of
polarized identity factors. Not only that, but you find the
Phi ratio all over in living systems such as plants, animals
and in the human form.
Phi ratio is what ultimately gives life, i.e. drags the
life-force from the void into delimited forms, thus borrowing
everything from Void-mind.