The John Titor Project
Page 11 of 19
 

02/15/01 12:07 (about time travel) 415
DONUT-SHAPED SINGULARITY = PASSAGE INTO ALTERNATE WORLDLINE Another other more interesting result of passing through a donut singularity is that you travel through time by passing into another universe or worldline. Please see Penrose diagrams for Kerr Black holes or you can examine the calculations of Frank Tipler. So now the problem becomes'. where do we find a donut-shaped singularity'

02/15/01 12:07 (about time travel) 416
A PONDERING HAWKING = MICRO-SINGULARITY Steven Hawking proposed the existence of micro-singularities that were created in the big bang. They were probably about the size of a proton and disappeared over the years due to an effect of radiation evaporation. (Yes, black holes do emit energy.)

02/15/01 12:07 (about time travel) 417
HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS = ARTIFICIAL MICRO-SINGULARITY When I first started posting online a few months ago, I said that major breakthroughs in particle physics were around your corner. Soon, CERN will bring their big machine on line and they will be smashing very fast and high-energy particles together. One of the more odd and potentially dangerous items produced from this increase in energy will be micro-singularities a fraction of the size of an electron. (for those who would like to follow the developments at CERN) public.web.cern.ch...

02/15/01 12:07 (about time travel) 418
ARTIFICIAL MICRO-SINGULARITY = LOCALIZED KERR FIELD Through trial and error, and although they are quite heavy, hot and capable of putting out a great deal of energy (300 - 500 megawatts), it's discovered that these micro-singularities can be electrified and captured. It is also interesting to note at this point that electrified singularities also have two event horizons. By spinning these various micro-singularities, a localized Kerr field is created.

02/15/01 12:07 (about time travel) 419
LOCALIZED KERR FIELD = TIPLER SINUSOID By using two micro-singularities in close proximity to each other, it is possible to create, manipulate and alter the Kerr fields to create a Tipler gravity sinusoid. This field can be adjusted, rotated and moved in order to simulate the movement of mass through a donut-shaped singularity and into an alternate world line. Thus, safe time travel.

02/15/01 17:06 (right now) 420
((Do you feel some pleasure in breathing clean air and not having to check a Geiger counter every few miles'))
Yes I do. However there is a fear about being here that I can only define as uncertainty. When I walk around in 2001, the air smells clean but I wonder if it really is. In 2036, there is no gray. The air is either clean or it will kill you. That feeling is very overwhelming when I eat here.

02/15/01 17:06 (predictions for the future) 421
You mean other than the mad cow pandemic, the breakthroughs in high-energy physics and the unknown functions of the 5100'

02/15/01 17:06 (about the future) 422
((Is propane still around in the future'))
Yes but not very much of it comes from natural gas. Hydrogen is converted into propane because it's easier to handle.

02/15/01 17:06 (safety, suggestions, assorted philosophy) 423
((I would hope that the paradise I live in would somehow be spared (the Hawaiian Islands) but I suspect it would not be spared as a strategic target for obvious reasons))
My parents went to Hawaii on their Honeymoon. My dad told me a quick story about going to a fast food store and paying 6 or 7 dollars for a hamburger. I got an image in my head of a huge tanker filled with frozen hamburgers headed into the Pacific. Hawaii is very dependant on the mainland for food'. isn't it'

02/15/01 17:06 (safety, suggestions, assorted philosophy) 424
((1) Does the last name Hubbard have any historical (is that the right term') relevance'))
You may leave a message to yourself if you wish.

02/15/01 17:06 (about the future) 425
((2) What happens with Australia' does it play a major part in the war'))
I believed I wrote about Australia a bit earlier.

02/15/01 17:06 (about the future) 426
((3) What colloquial language is used in the future'))
Many people use the internet for communication and entertainment. I would say that affects our speech. We type very fast.

02/15/01 17:06 (about the future) 427
((4) What exactly happens to the water' does it get poisoned from radiation'))
Yes, radiation affected the water but that can always be distilled out. There are biological hazards that cannot. In addition, fresh water is hard to come by without talking to someone with a gun first.

02/15/01 17:06 (about time travel) 428
((6) Does time have ends'))
Yes. It is believed that all worldlines end. It is also thought that parallel worldlines that appear to be the same end at different times.

02/15/01 17:06 (about time travel) 429
((7) Lets just say that people from the future are manipulating events now, such as preventing a tragedy, making it never occur. If it never occurred, no body would be sent back to stop it, which would mean that the event does take place. This would lead to the prevention of it happening again, and so on. What would happen in one of these situations'))
Based on my understanding of time, manipulation of your worldline by future time travelers would have no affect on their original or home worldline. If that is happening, it must be for a desired outcome or result on your worldline only. If UFOs are time travelers, they plan on reaping what they sew from you not their home.

02/15/01 17:06 (about time travel) 430
((John, if you really did travel through time you'd be dead. You have to take into account that the universe is expanding, the Earth, the solar system and the galaxy are all moving. If you truly did travel back through time, you'd materialize in 1970 where the Earth WILL be in 2036, which is the vacuum of space.))
This is an excellent point and one I thought I went over a bit earlier. There is a gravity lock system that compensates for the local gravity outside of the Tipler sinusoid. This is the reason the unit is only accurate to about 60 years.

02/15/01 17:06 (about the future) 431
(1) What role does Australia play in the war' You stated elsewhere that they repulse a Chinese invasion - Does this mean Australian government side with your enemy' (As I think I recall you stating that they allied with your side + Russia... Could be wrong though.))
There were deep divisions in Australia also. I would associate it more with a powder keg than a civil war.

02/15/01 17:06 (about the future) 432
((2) Does intercontinental transportation still exist' If so, have you visited other countries'))
Yes, but the market is much smaller. No, I have not been overseas.
 

 


02/19/01 11:03 (safety, suggestions, assorted philosophy) 433
((There is no way for you to know if there is no future world leader reading this and believing.))
Are you sure about that' Besides, I think you can have just as much impact as any 'future leader'.

02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 434
(I find it very difficult to believe that a software tweak (hence 'software engineers', -software-) done to a 1975 machine could cause it to do this translation more effectively or more portably than something around even today.))
Ahhh' something we have in common. Yes, I felt that way too. However, my job was to go and get it and not debate why they wanted it. I am not a computer expert

02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 435
((I find it almost impossible to believe that a tweak done by a 'software engineer' in 1975 could provide for you something that you could find at no other place between now and 'your time', and certainly without having to make a stop-over in our time to get back that far.))
A great deal of the computer infrastructure you depend on is based on very old systems and code. One of the reasons I was sent to 1975 was because of the person I met there, not the technology.

02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 436
((4. I have, and continue to believe Dr. Hawking's view in regards to the possibility of time travel if indeed the model of time is what you have suggested, that all possibilities occur in different time-lines, in different universes is the way that time truly is. For this reason alone I cannot accept you. It is entirely logical, and I have seen no good case to counter it.))
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. If you believe in Multiple World Theory, Hawking was not the one who first thought of that. If you do, then I must be real if all possibilities exist. As I recall, Hawking felt that it was possible to build a machine but some sort of vacuum fluctuations would destroy it right before you tried to use it.

02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 437
((Time travel may be possible, but if you were to time travel, you would NOT land on Earth. You would land in a vacuum of space. You have to take into account that the universe is expanding, the Earth, the solar system and the galaxy are all moving. If you truly did travel back through time, you'd materialize in 1970 where the Earth WILL be in 2036, which is NOT Earth.. it's space.))
Yes, this is a problem. It was solved by taking a 'snapshot' of the local gravity around the unit before leaving a worldline and incorporating it into the sinusoid during travel. The short answer is, you 'stick' to the earth but this is only a useful explanation to understand it and it's not practical. Since the computer system is using a virtual reference, the calculations become flawed.

02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 438
1. Based on the accuracy and timing of the 'snapshots' the distortion units are limited to how long they can travel before becoming unstable.

02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 439
2. We must leave and arrive in areas we have prior or future knowledge of in order to avoid massive objects (buildings, water, etc')

02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 440
3. The unit has a fail-safe system during travel that drops out in case of a unit shutdown or radical departure in gravity readings.

02/19/01 16:01 (about the future) 441
((1.) What weapons did you use to protect yourself throughout your life' Do you have a weapon with you now, just in case'))


02/19/01 16:01 (predictions for the future) 442
((3.) Your enemy was in the cities. Was the President in 2005 also on the enemy side' was the President in 2009 on the enemy side' How did you feel personally about these Presidents'))
The President or 'leader' in 2005 I believe tried desperately to be the next Lincoln and hold the country together but many of their policies drove a larger wedge into the Bill of Rights. The President in 2009 was interested only in keeping his/her power base.

Back to Contents