02/15/01 12:07 (about time travel)
415
DONUT-SHAPED SINGULARITY = PASSAGE INTO ALTERNATE WORLDLINE
Another other more interesting result of passing through a donut
singularity is that you travel through time by passing into
another universe or worldline. Please see Penrose diagrams for
Kerr Black holes or you can examine the calculations of Frank
Tipler. So now the problem becomes'. where do we find a
donut-shaped singularity'
02/15/01 12:07 (about time travel) 416
A PONDERING HAWKING = MICRO-SINGULARITY Steven Hawking proposed
the existence of micro-singularities that were created in the
big bang. They were probably about the size of a proton and
disappeared over the years due to an effect of radiation
evaporation. (Yes, black holes do emit energy.)
02/15/01 12:07 (about time travel) 417
HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS = ARTIFICIAL MICRO-SINGULARITY When I first
started posting online a few months ago, I said that major
breakthroughs in particle physics were around your corner. Soon,
CERN will bring their big machine on line and they will be
smashing very fast and high-energy particles together. One of
the more odd and potentially dangerous items produced from this
increase in energy will be micro-singularities a fraction of the
size of an electron. (for those who would like to follow the
developments at CERN) public.web.cern.ch...
02/15/01 12:07 (about time travel) 418
ARTIFICIAL MICRO-SINGULARITY = LOCALIZED KERR FIELD Through
trial and error, and although they are quite heavy, hot and
capable of putting out a great deal of energy (300 - 500
megawatts), it's discovered that these micro-singularities can
be electrified and captured. It is also interesting to note at
this point that electrified singularities also have two event
horizons. By spinning these various micro-singularities, a
localized Kerr field is created.
02/15/01 12:07 (about time travel) 419
LOCALIZED KERR FIELD = TIPLER SINUSOID By using two
micro-singularities in close proximity to each other, it is
possible to create, manipulate and alter the Kerr fields to
create a Tipler gravity sinusoid. This field can be adjusted,
rotated and moved in order to simulate the movement of mass
through a donut-shaped singularity and into an alternate world
line. Thus, safe time travel.
02/15/01 17:06 (right now) 420
((Do you feel some pleasure in breathing clean air and not
having to check a Geiger counter every few miles'))
Yes I do. However there is a fear about being here that I can
only define as uncertainty. When I walk around in 2001, the air
smells clean but I wonder if it really is. In 2036, there is no
gray. The air is either clean or it will kill you. That feeling
is very overwhelming when I eat here.
02/15/01 17:06 (predictions for the future) 421
You mean other than the mad cow pandemic, the breakthroughs in
high-energy physics and the unknown functions of the 5100'
02/15/01 17:06 (about the future) 422
((Is propane still around in the future'))
Yes but not very much of it comes from natural gas. Hydrogen is
converted into propane because it's easier to handle.
02/15/01 17:06 (safety, suggestions, assorted philosophy) 423
((I would hope that the paradise I live in would somehow be
spared (the Hawaiian Islands) but I suspect it would not be
spared as a strategic target for obvious reasons))
My parents went to Hawaii on their Honeymoon. My dad told me a
quick story about going to a fast food store and paying 6 or 7
dollars for a hamburger. I got an image in my head of a huge
tanker filled with frozen hamburgers headed into the Pacific.
Hawaii is very dependant on the mainland for food'. isn't it'
02/15/01 17:06 (safety, suggestions, assorted philosophy) 424
((1) Does the last name Hubbard have any historical (is that the
right term') relevance'))
You may leave a message to yourself if you wish.
02/15/01 17:06 (about the future) 425
((2) What happens with Australia' does it play a major part in
the war'))
I believed I wrote about Australia a bit earlier.
02/15/01 17:06 (about the future) 426
((3) What colloquial language is used in the future'))
Many people use the internet for communication and
entertainment. I would say that affects our speech. We type very
fast.
02/15/01 17:06 (about the future) 427
((4) What exactly happens to the water' does it get poisoned
from radiation'))
Yes, radiation affected the water but that can always be
distilled out. There are biological hazards that cannot. In
addition, fresh water is hard to come by without talking to
someone with a gun first.
02/15/01 17:06 (about time travel) 428
((6) Does time have ends'))
Yes. It is believed that all worldlines end. It is also thought
that parallel worldlines that appear to be the same end at
different times.
02/15/01 17:06 (about time travel) 429
((7) Lets just say that people from the future are manipulating
events now, such as preventing a tragedy, making it never occur.
If it never occurred, no body would be sent back to stop it,
which would mean that the event does take place. This would lead
to the prevention of it happening again, and so on. What would
happen in one of these situations'))
Based on my understanding of time, manipulation of your
worldline by future time travelers would have no affect on their
original or home worldline. If that is happening, it must be for
a desired outcome or result on your worldline only. If UFOs are
time travelers, they plan on reaping what they sew from you not
their home.
02/15/01 17:06 (about time travel) 430
((John, if you really did travel through time you'd be dead. You
have to take into account that the universe is expanding, the
Earth, the solar system and the galaxy are all moving. If you
truly did travel back through time, you'd materialize in 1970
where the Earth WILL be in 2036, which is the vacuum of space.))
This is an excellent point and one I thought I went over a bit
earlier. There is a gravity lock system that compensates for the
local gravity outside of the Tipler sinusoid. This is the reason
the unit is only accurate to about 60 years.
02/15/01 17:06 (about the future) 431
(1) What role does Australia play in the war' You stated
elsewhere that they repulse a Chinese invasion - Does this mean
Australian government side with your enemy' (As I think I recall
you stating that they allied with your side + Russia... Could be
wrong though.))
There were deep divisions in Australia also. I would associate
it more with a powder keg than a civil war.
02/15/01 17:06 (about the future) 432
((2) Does intercontinental transportation still exist' If so,
have you visited other countries'))
Yes, but the market is much smaller. No, I have not been
overseas.
02/19/01 11:03 (safety, suggestions, assorted philosophy) 433
((There is no way for you to know if there is no future world
leader reading this and believing.))
Are you sure about that' Besides, I think you can have just as
much impact as any 'future leader'.
02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 434
(I find it very difficult to believe that a software tweak
(hence 'software engineers', -software-) done to a 1975 machine
could cause it to do this translation more effectively or more
portably than something around even today.))
Ahhh' something we have in common. Yes, I felt that way too.
However, my job was to go and get it and not debate why they
wanted it. I am not a computer expert
02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 435
((I find it almost impossible to believe that a tweak done by a
'software engineer' in 1975 could provide for you something that
you could find at no other place between now and 'your time',
and certainly without having to make a stop-over in our time to
get back that far.))
A great deal of the computer infrastructure you depend on is
based on very old systems and code. One of the reasons I was
sent to 1975 was because of the person I met there, not the
technology.
02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 436
((4. I have, and continue to believe Dr. Hawking's view in
regards to the possibility of time travel if indeed the model of
time is what you have suggested, that all possibilities occur in
different time-lines, in different universes is the way that
time truly is. For this reason alone I cannot accept you. It is
entirely logical, and I have seen no good case to counter it.))
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. If you believe in
Multiple World Theory, Hawking was not the one who first thought
of that. If you do, then I must be real if all possibilities
exist. As I recall, Hawking felt that it was possible to build a
machine but some sort of vacuum fluctuations would destroy it
right before you tried to use it.
02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 437
((Time travel may be possible, but if you were to time travel,
you would NOT land on Earth. You would land in a vacuum of
space. You have to take into account that the universe is
expanding, the Earth, the solar system and the galaxy are all
moving. If you truly did travel back through time, you'd
materialize in 1970 where the Earth WILL be in 2036, which is
NOT Earth.. it's space.))
Yes, this is a problem. It was solved by taking a 'snapshot' of
the local gravity around the unit before leaving a worldline and
incorporating it into the sinusoid during travel. The short
answer is, you 'stick' to the earth but this is only a useful
explanation to understand it and it's not practical. Since the
computer system is using a virtual reference, the calculations
become flawed.
02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 438
1. Based on the accuracy and timing of the 'snapshots' the
distortion units are limited to how long they can travel before
becoming unstable.
02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 439
2. We must leave and arrive in areas we have prior or future
knowledge of in order to avoid massive objects (buildings,
water, etc')
02/19/01 11:03 (about time travel) 440
3. The unit has a fail-safe system during travel that drops out
in case of a unit shutdown or radical departure in gravity
readings.
02/19/01 16:01 (about the future) 441
((1.) What weapons did you use to protect yourself throughout
your life' Do you have a weapon with you now, just in case'))
02/19/01 16:01 (predictions for the future) 442
((3.) Your enemy was in the cities. Was the President in 2005
also on the enemy side' was the President in 2009 on the enemy
side' How did you feel personally about these Presidents'))
The President or 'leader' in 2005 I believe tried desperately to
be the next Lincoln and hold the country together but many of
their policies drove a larger wedge into the Bill of Rights. The
President in 2009 was interested only in keeping his/her power
base.