PART TWO

THE SOCIAL MANIPULATION

CHAPTER VI: CANNIBALISTIC FASCIST LITIGATION

Between 1986 and 1992, my family and I were subjected to intense judicial harassment which had nothing to do with the subject matters of approximately six fraudulent and abusive judicial proceedings filed against me or otherwise government instigated, which were mostly disguised as “property” suits. This harassment took up almost all my time, energy, and resources, and destroyed my family. The lead attorney in this abuse was a Jesuit-trained attorney of Sicilian extraction, who had prosecuted G.I.s for the J.A.G., during the Vietnam War.

The Jesuits are especially known for their collaboration with the CIA’s mind-control experiments such as the MK ULTRA Project.1 This attorney was what I would call a “judicial torture specialist”. Every horrible, dirty, underhanded, cheap trick imaginable was used in this litigation, and the CIA’s involvement was obviated by the immunity from judicial discipline which the perpetrators enjoyed, in spite of their overtly unethical conduct before the New Mexico courts, as well as the joyous, sadistic relish with which the judicial turds carried the dirty dealings out in the name of “justice”.

1Cathy O’Brien and Mark Phillips, Trance-Formation of America
 

During the same approximate period of time, I filed a patent application which was to ‘sound out’ the patent office to either obtain a patent or see if the P.T.O. is really as corrupt as I’d heard. I have numerous other novel, undisclosed inventions—at least a hundred—most of which were more advanced technically than the one I sought a patent on, but the simpler mechanical, thermodynamic and hydrodynamic invention was more clearly novel, and would be a better sounding board to feel out the patent office’s integrity. My strategy was also designed to avoid exposing a more valuable invention to the prying eyes of the corporate-state monopolists, during the supposedly secret patent proceeding.

Patent examiners have their many offices in the outlying areas surrounding Washington, D.C., tucked away in little offices which are not under close scrutiny by the patent office. The examiners often have semi-illiterate or mentally retarded secretaries who have no idea of what is going on, so that under-the-table dealings between the examiners and the large interests can be conducted, in violation of patent rules, without the ignorant secretaries getting wise.

One invention I had developed in 1978 had already been stolen by a creep who had been given a new, false identity in America, by the U.S. Army C.I.C., after being brought here under Operation Paperclip at the end of WWII. His specialty seemed to be industrial espionage, and he had the CIA’s cooperation and protection in whatever he did. I later received confirmation that the CIA employs such people in an on-going program to steal technology from inventors to be sold to fund their black operations.

The stolen invention was a new kind of solar voltaic cell, created with a new kind of construction technique carried out with a new mass-production technique for producing solar voltaic chips on a conveyor belt, carrying the chips through several chambers. The process used hydrofluoric acid vapor, containing positive and negative dopants, applied to layers of pure, crystalline silica sand, the crystals of which were to be electromagnetically polarized and positioned, before being fused with microwaves.

Between the silica crystals, layers of ‘sputtered’ metals were applied for conductivity. I chose hydrofluoric acid vapor to carry the dopants, since it would etch them into the sand crystals. The process eliminated the very expensive and tedious process involving the growing of silicone crystals in a high temperature furnace, after which the crystals had to be sliced into thin wafers with a diamond saw. Instead, I used silica sand crystals produced in nature. In addition, my automated process was designed to further decrease the price of the cells. Cheap, but durable materials and processes were used throughout. This process became the new industry standard, and has made $millions—maybe even $billions—for the CIA-friendly industrialists.

Within 10 days of the theft of my plans for this invention, a Michigan pal of the thief filed a patent application. The thief also stole over 80 ounces of highly purified iridium (a platinum group metal, worth over $80,000.00 at the time), which I had extracted from ore concentrate, at great risk to my life and health under the circumstances.

The patent neglected to include the part about using pure silica sand, and used only the more usual sliced crystal wafers, along with the rest of my ingenious new process. I reasoned that the exclusion of the sand technology was because it has the capacity to make solar voltaic cells so cheap that you could use them as roof shingles, and the invention would become public domain in only 17 years. Such a technology would soon greatly diminish dependency on fossil fuels and electric power companies.

The patent concentrated on my manufacturing process, which increased the efficiency of solar voltaic cells by almost 100%—from around 12-14% to 25%. The invention was then sold to ARCO, a company created by Robert O. Anderson of Roswell, former president of the Bilderberg Group, as I have already mentioned.
 

The proceeds of this sale were apparently shared by the CIA and its technology thieves, phony inventors, and developers.

My patent application—the one for the transmission invention—was for an off-theshelf, universal, variable, dynamic transmission, which could be produced as an
hydraulic or pneumatic one, in a multitude of forms and sizes. I knew that there was nothing like it on the market or in the patent office, though there were several inventions which had come close, passing right by it, yet missing it completely. Some had parts or sections similar to it, used in ways that showed a complete unawareness of the simple invention lying only inches away.

Due to their failures to see the invention, their inventions were no more than inoperable and inefficient conglomerations. My drawings and basic parts of the application and invention are shown in Appendix A. I dedicated this invention to the public in my first edition of 1993, to prevent the corporate thieves from profiting from it or keeping it out of public use.

I knew that under the constitution, the patent office was obligated to grant a patent on this invention, once it became apparent that it was a valuable, novel creation like no other.

By allowing corporate thieves a preliminary look at a patent application, they can decide whether or not they are interested in it. If so, the examiner can run the applicant ragged with all kinds of bureaucratic procedures and fees, intended to force him to abandon his application. Once the applicant abandons his application, the corporation can apply for a patent on the exact, same, identical invention, receive a patent, and grease the palm of the examiner.

This prevents the public from using the invention for at least 20 years (about three years are taken up in applying for the patent, and an additional 17 years are added to that), thus slowing down progress, so that the vested interests can continue to promulgate their archaic technology. By the end of that time, if the corporation has chosen not to put the invention into service, it is usually forgotten about.

There I was with a series of CIA-instigated abusive lawsuits against me, and at the same time, a pending patent application. Between the Oct. 25, 1978 invention and metals theft, and the 1993 publication of the first edition of this book, at least four murder attempts were made against me, all of which I could connect to the CIA and its technology thieves. There were probably more murder attempts than that, but the other attempts were more difficult to identify.

One of the murder attempts consisted of having children give me food in a restaurant which was contaminated with salmonella, on the same day that a “notice of abandonment” was mailed by the patent examiner from Washington, D.C. The only people who could have known of the mailing of the notice, were those the examiner told , in violation of the rule of secrecy. That occurred in 1992, at which time I began writing this book in earnest, with the determination to publish it, since another murder attempt could succeed, and it would be attributed to “natural causes”, and no one would ever know why.

The courts, through a series of judicially corrupt and abusive orders, based on lies, repeatedly held me in contempt without notice or hearing, struck pleadings necessary to protect my civil and property rights, and prohibited me from filing pleadings, in violation of my due process rights. They deprived me of some of my property, forced the abandonment of a patent application, destroyed my family, and subjected all four of us to vicious, treacherous and abusive orders, manipulation, anxiety attack, and intentionally inflicted emotional, physical, mental and economic distress. They impoverished me and sapped my physical, emotional, financial and mental resources. I wanted, and still want, revenge. Can you blame me?

The local trash who carried out these filthy acts were small-time toadies, drug dealers, money-grubbers, property thieves, trashy and crooked realtors, title examiners and insurers, yeggs, and socialist bureaucrats. The people who directed this “machine”, were part of a corporate-statist, coercive-monopolist, fascist elite. What this elite fears most is a truly free, creative, laissez-faire, free-market economy, in which a broad base of people participate and prosper. Their “machine” is designed to maintain their control.

My many unpatented inventions were the result of intensive research and creative activity I engaged in between 1976 and 1986—ten years. It is my intent to give these inventions to the public to further punish the elite, along with this expose of flying saucer electric propulsion technology, as my revenge for having subjected my family and me to the judicial abuse and deprivation of presence of mind, money, civil rights, human rights, and property.

The civil judicial system is a trap devised by corporate-statists, to ensnare and devour all those whose interests conflict with theirs’. The involvement of the N.S.A. and CIA is incidental to their functions as pawns in the game, under Trilateral Commission orders, to protect the corporate/state alliance from damaging scientific and technological breakthroughs and leaks.

The President is a member of the Trilateral Commission, and he gives the orders which the Commission gives to him. An example of the behavior of this hierarchy is the Gulf War bombings of Iraq in 1992 and 1998. The IMF and Bilderbergers want possession of Russia’s natural resources and basic industries, such as the phone system and other utilities—the things people must pay for every day—the same things the elite owns here. Russia’s loans from the IMF seem to be unsecured, as the Russians have held back on using their major national resources as collateral, while trying to get on their feet as a free market economy.

The elite wants them to use their vast natural resources and utility concessions as collateral for their IMF loans, so they can be induced to default on their loans, with the elite then coming into possession of these resources through bankruptcy and foreclosure procedures.

Russia has an oil deal with Iraq which they need to achieve a valid credit rating, and to pay off existing IMF loans which are continually overdue. The Russians are on their knees, and the IMF and Bilderbergers do not intend to let them get on their feet until they control Russia’s natural resources, the same as they control them in America.

The bombings of Iraq are designed to prevent Russia’s recovery, and primarily have nothing to do with anything else. The impeachment proceedings against President Bill Clinton have been designed to turn the heat up to force him to bomb Iraq for the Banksters. That way, the Russian-Iraqi oil deal will go sour and the Russians will be unable to repay their loans. It is hoped that, through this continual ruin of Russia’s attempts to succeed as a free market economy, the Russians will eventually be forced to surrender their resources to the Banksters.

Now that Clinton has bombed the Iraqis once more, he probably won’t be impeached. After all, the whole series of incidents involving Monica Lewinsky were orchestrated through a Pentagon set-up, in which a Pentagon employee—Linda Tripp— tape-record her conversations with Monica Lewinsky, another Pentagon employee. This could not have occurred without the approval of national security authorities, something which has never been mentioned in the whole mess. Otherwise, for one Pentagon employee to tape record their conversations with another, regarding the President, would be considered as espionage.

With the supposed crumbling of socialism, the American civil judicial system remains as a disguised means for a secret corporate-socialist state to continue to force its will upon those in its disfavor, favoring litigants within the parameters of its secret agenda, and denying the claims of those who are not. On the face of it, since this system serves only the elite, and provides no benefits to the ordinary American, the system should be abolished, and our rights restored. This includes ending the emergency status which has been protracted to suspend our rights since 1933 (though some think since 1913).

We ordinary Americans should not support a civil judicial system which fails to support us and is only for the powerful to keep us under their control. It has been abolishing our natural rights for some time, and should itself be abolished. It no longer serves the interests of the people, and has broken down. We are the damned bosses, and have no duty to serve “the system”.

Legitimate conflicts should be handled through a private criminal justice restitution system, or private civil court system, devoid of corporate-socialist conflicts of interest. Only cases which meet a preliminary burden of criminal jurisdiction should be allowed to be filed. The rest should be resolved by mediation, or perhaps “Tanistry” (the ancient Irish system based on Phoenician law).

With these suggestions in mind, we are now going to play a new game, in the following three parts, which I call (1) “The Ninth Amendment Quiet Game”, (2) “The Article One (Sec. 8, cl [8], and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments Property Game”, and (3) “The First Amendment End-Run Game” (also referred to as “The Ol’ Statute of Liberty Play”).

The Patent and Trademark Office’s (“P.T.O.’s”) rules are designed to loot isolated, individual, dreamer-type—typically eccentric or naive—inventors, some of whom may have only one good idea in their entire lives. Like beneficial insects being ensnared by giant, evil spiders, they are lured into the trap, encouraged by government/corporate propaganda, to seek patents. Corporations, which invent NOTHING (except high-toned slogans and logos), collaborate with the Patent Office, successfully stealing inventions from a steady flow of inventor-sucker applicants with stars in their eyes.

This book blows the cover on that scam.

The creativity which has been the hallmark of the American experience is rapidly diminishing with the oppression of our creative people, by denying fair compensation and credit, while exploiting their creative products. Inventors come to the P.T.O. as trusting fools, and under its weird rules, the P.T.O. stabs them in their backs, helping the corporate thieves steal their inventions. If these inventors had other inventions—which most of them do—they would make no further disclosures—which most of them don’t—in order to avoid repeating the trauma and disappointment of multiple “patent rape” by the U.S. government and corporate state. I can now speak for these hapless inventors, since I was among them.

While not all inventors’ claims are valid, the P.T.O. condescendingly grants many token patents for worthless, inoperable ‘paper’ inventions, simply because the applications are filed by patent attorneys, conform to the P.T.O.’s weird bureaucratic idea of proper applications, and present no real threat to the vested interests. Though such inventions may be harmless, inoperable devices, the patents may contain disclosures which work to the benefit of the corporations, by creating the false illusion that the ‘little fellah’ has rights too, provided he goes into hock for a high-priced PATENT ATTORNEY.

This false illusion helps maintain the flow of suckers to the patent office. Meanwhile, more valuable applications are denied for purely formal reasons, since the inventions are to end up in the hands of corporate thieves, who may at their whims suppress or confiscate them, obliterating the true inventors with a wall of litigation they cannot even begin to penetrate. Though I have been abused many times by my government, I refuse to dissolve in despair like so many others whom the P.T.O. and the civil litigation system have permanently crushed.

A patent as we know it does not secure anything, except the right to attempt to enforce it in court. The true nature of the right is the inalienable property right of an inventor, to the disposition of wealth he created. Property rights are not created by the government, and an inventor owns his invention whether or not the government grants a patent, which is not true security. “Invention” is an individual, creative process.

While we patronize—purely as a legal fiction—that corporations are individuals, we should not extend this fiction to consider them to be inventors of creative products. Corporations should be absolutely prohibited from seeking a patent, or from holding a patent or the rights to one, until after a patent has been granted to the true individual inventor(s).

Furthermore, the P.T.O., under our Congress—which is constitutionally mandated with the duty to secure to inventors the properties of their inventions—should have their provisions completely restructured to accomplish the exact constitutional mandate, no ifs, ands, or buts. It is well-known to every real inventor in America, that the system fails to work as intended, and must be changed for the better or abolished.

A. THE REAL ISSUES: THE WAVE OF THE FUTURE

The groundswells in the EAST are moving toward us like a TIDAL WAVE, which the bureaucrats will be caught up in for the same reasons as their Soviet counterparts; they will eventually have to find some form of productive work, after a flabby lifetime of sponging off the taxpayers; many bureaucrats who anticipate the future are already engaged in damage control. (It is even rumored that they are wearing bullet-proof underwear.)

A bureaucrat of any kind will never be anything but a leech to the common man. In every socialistic society, the bureaucrats are the disgusting toadies who sell out their fellow citizens, in exchange for a small share of the loot stolen by the power elite.

Bureaucrats are not entitled to gloat over the failure of the communist system, since people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw rocks. The issue is not simply whether the state permits religious freedom—as some would like for you to believe—but

• whether governments have legitimate power to execute, imprison, or punish citizens, or to confiscate their money (‘taxes’)

• or property (or inventions)

• or in general, their wealth, for the “public good”, for bureaucratic convenience

• or for the political recalcitrance of their owners or creators, by having disbelieved, mistrusted, or defied the government

• or for having refused to obey

• or to believe what their government ordered them to believe

• or for having followed or advocated a political philosophy

• or personal, moral lifestyle which was officially declared to be undesirable or prohibited, even though legal

• or for having simply asked the question of whether bureaucrats really serve the interests of everyone

• or for having suggested that they serve only their own interests and those of an American corporate oligarchy, similar to that which ruled Soviet Russia or Nazi Germany, and still rules certain Central and South American countries (such as “United Fruit Company”), or China (i.e., such as “EXXON”, or the “Communist Party”, etc.)

• or for suggesting that they represent illegitimate, usurped authority of a corporate-fascist state, rather than the proper, constitutionally-ordained, limited power delegated by self-governing, sovereign individuals, who lack the authority or right to delegate more authority to any government

• and finally, whether such agencies as the P.T.O. operate in conformance with their duties to the American People, which the Constitution originally mandated Congress to enforce

We can never have a “kinder, gentler society”, so long as there is a gestapo-like I.R.S. to force us to pay for the extermination of Iraqis who are in the way of the Trilateral Commission’s plan to confiscate the natural resources, monetary system, and industries of Russia, or so long as the doctrine of eminent domain is legal in America. So-called communist states are in reality, corporate states. Chernobyl was no accident, but rather the inevitable result of corporate-state arrogance, brittleness, recklessness, irresponsibility, negligence, oversight, and insanity, born of seemingly immutable and concentrated monolithic power.

The corporate-statist Federal Reserve Banksters exert coercion through police-state agencies like the I.R.S., F.B.I., C.I.A., N.S.A., A.E.C., D.O.E., N.R.C., and S.E.C. etc., to enforce exclusive commercial, industrial, or governmental franchises granted either by or to the state, or through partnerships with the select corporate providers of “public services”, who enjoy matrimonial bliss in the convenient (for them, not for us) fascist marriage between “...the state and industry...”. In Soviet Russia, the corporations were composed only of members of the Communist Party. Here, the party is replaced by “public corporations”, which differ only to the extent of a greater amount of mixed-economy socialism, and some possible token collectivistic participation by the public as “stockholders”.

To induce productivity of inventors, public policy must reflect a false illusion of freedom and opportunity, so that the trust of inventors can be maintained. After all, if the people don’t present the illusion of freedom, who will trust the Patent Office?

Like their Soviet counterparts, the American government enhances corporate-state power, by assuring the accumulation of technologically creative products by coercive-monopolist corporate partners, through fraud upon individual creative people and the people as a whole. By misfeasance and abuse of the powers of Congress, under U.S. Const. Art. 1, sec. 8 cl. [8], the Patent Office promises a patent under the Constitution, as a means of enforcing a seventeen-year monopoly through litigation, in the name of the inventor, as an inducement for inventors to disclose and to share their discoveries with society, for the advancement of science and the useful arts; that is their “bait”. But the P.T.O.’s real bosses are not “the people”, any more than those of the Soviet bureaucracy. Its rules have been redesigned since the days of Jefferson and Franklin.

Patent applications are like ripe plums to the elite, all for the picking. Any significant energy, transportation or manufacturing breakthrough automatically becomes a national security secret, which allows the government to remove all evidence of a patent application, to confiscate the invention, and to prohibit disclosures to the public under the secrecy acts. After confiscation, the work is then turned over to the usual corporate-state companies, so they can manufacture secret equipment to be sold to the government at huge profit.
 

An example was the invention of an artificial fish gill, which separates hydrogen and oxygen in water, on contact, and could be used to power a hydrogen-powered car, etc. (NOTE: Paradoxically, the taking of such discoveries by the secret government, in our name, obliterates our knowledge of the technology. Nonetheless, it becomes public domain one year after the government’s acquisition—by about 1974 for the fish gill device—but since such secrets are rarely declassified, we may never know about them.).

Other discoveries, which cannot be construed as national security secrets, are steered into the hands of their corporate partners through abuse of P.T.O. procedures, to the disparagement of the individuals who created them, and to the detriment of the public.

If a discovery represents a threat to obsolete technology being sold by the coercive monopolists, the discovery is concealed, and the public never uses it. In many cases, inventors who protest, or refuse to give up their inventions, are fraudulently labeled as “criminals” or “con-artists”, by the government, which often adapts abusive prosecutions under the Federal Securities Exchange Commission regulations, or the I.R.S., etc., for the purpose of eradicating competition to their corporate partners.

The greatest threat to the freedom of the people, is official government secrecy, particularly concerning energy and transportation, and coercive, obsolete technological (economic) slavery, enforced by a fascist judiciary which takes its marching orders from the N.S.A., CIA, Trilateral Commission, and the Illuminati (which in our context, involves the upper echelons of the “Knights Templars”, and the Jesuit Order—including some within the American Masonic Order... a small, powerful sect some of whom may be found within the Shriners, the Knights of Columbus, the Knights of Malta, the Bilderburgers, or any other secret group, such as the CIA.

Some American Masonic lodges have been converted to the Illuminati Order, through the influence of the “Old Prussian, Northern European, White Freemasonry” which was infested by the Nazi “Ahnenerbe”. These same powers exist within the Jesuit Order, especially those derived from French and Bavarian sources, after the time of Napoleon. Either way, they get us coming and going.

The greatest threat to the central banks and their underlings—which control basic mineral resources, refineries, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and public utilities, and other public service cartels fueled by these—is the development of autonomous home-generated power systems, which can power cheap transportation and home industry, and heat and power homes. To make this threat more complete, such power systems should generate their energy from water (hydrogen and oxygen), from the air (combustion of nitrogen and oxygen by electrical spark-discharge), from the earth-atmosphere electrical potential, from cosmic radiation, from magnetism, from non-radioactive nuclear reactors, or from wind and solar power, which the government cannot justify the regulation of because they are safe. The development and use of such systems is completely consistent to the achievement of a pollution-free environment.

The courts insure the cartels against such threats, by secret national security judicial proceedings, binding all judges and courts against all free individuals, under the unconstitutional laws involved.

Corporate-state power rests on control of primary resources, insured by judicial suppression of threatening technology, thus artificially maintaining our dependency. At the top, they are well aware of the existence of numerous inventions which will destroy them, such as the flying saucer, through cooperation with the P.T.O. and N.S.A. Several such inventions have been invented by me, or are represented by my own versions of what I suspect are suppressed prior art, although they may have in fact been my own discoveries. Sometimes you can never know for sure, because of the secrecy and suppression.

On occasion, government scientists with top-secret clearances approached me to deny the government’s possession of what they believed I was working on, presumably to induce me to disclose a particular discovery to them in a patent application, so they could acquire it through national security priorities. Since I have already been suckered in several times, I won’t do it again, and advise all other inventors to do the same. Unless you’re a huge corporation, they’ll rip all energy inventions off.

The national security confiscation of inventions creates a convenient shield, so that no patents are granted. The discoveries remain secret, never become public domain, and even the inventors are denied access to them. The government chooses who manufactures them, without the knowledge or permission of the inventors. The inventors are denied knowledge of income and value in the secret usage, and the hugh potential profits possible by otherwise public usage, as well as the related benefits of prestige, recognition, and fame.

The inventions are appropriated by force, and the inventors given whatever the government decides, if anything. The inventors are threatened with criminal sanctions for disobedience, under national security laws, without the right to public trial. We never benefit, science and the useful arts are not advanced, the constitutional provisions are unenforced or destroyed, and our government has betrayed us.

The individual’s most private intellectual rights and property—his mind and its creations—has been raped by the fraud and force of his own government. In many cases, inventions are stolen by the CIA, which then creates its own fake corporations to secretly sell the stolen inventions to the government, producing more income for “black operations”.

The whining and whimpering by corporate statists, about Japanese or Asian competition, is dishonest, undignified, ignorant, and disgusting. American corporations are at fault for their creative incompetence, and their compromise of the principles upon which a creative and competitive free-market society is based. Those who fear a free world should not be taken seriously. It is they who would drag us into another war for their benefit, by playing on old sentiments, to force us to fight and die for their “right” to screw us and not even kiss us.

The argument that the Japanese do not practice free-market economics internally is impertinent for three reasons, which are:

(1) That the competition should be between the best products for the best prices, rather than between nationalities

(2) that since the U.S. is not practicing free-market economics internally either, the corporations are equitably estopped to complain about the Japanese system

(3) that since the system which promotes and protects the greatest degree of individual creativity and laissez-faire will be the actual “winner”, only these parameters and no others should be considered, in the interest of everyone in the world, regardless of nationality. This is also in the interest of the national security

Trying to bilk a bunch of old veterans of the Pacific war into thinking it is in our interest to erect protectionist barriers, is a lie, and will only hurt the Average American, and empower the elite.

No credit is due to the P.T.O. or judiciary, in the demise of socialism or statism, since they are part of that system, and are still supporting it. All credit belongs to creative people—individual freedom fighters everywhere—whom the corporate-state is against. As part of a world socialist system, our corporate-statists enjoy a greater degree of fascist privilege than their foreign colleagues, and are not entitled to gloat unless they resign. A protest against socialist bureaucratic deadbeats in Romania, Byelorussia, or China, is a protest against them here.

The historical clock is ticking away like a time bomb, and they don’t know how to diffuse it. Chernobyl was an alarm in the early morning of vast change. It was no wonder that there were no bureaucrats fighting or resisting Big Brother at Tiananmen Square, Concord, the Alamo, or the Little Bighorn; bureaucrats need Big Brother, and Big Brother needs them.

• Why would bureaucrats want freedom, which would take away their illegitimate jobs and power?

• Why would bureaucrats, who apparently represent defective human genotypes who are incapable of independent, creative or productive work, want a free system, in which their only remaining means of survival would be as uncreative and incompetent—although more honest—thieves?

• Why would bureaucrats want completely safe nuclear reactors, which would take away their excuses for regulatory busy-work, and threaten their cozy corporate partnerships?

For obvious reasons (as some may have noticed), our bureaucrats and some large American corporations have been helping Communist bureaucrats in Russia to resist change. That is because, although change is inevitable, they want to insure that those in control in the future represent the interests of the Trilateral Commission, as did their Communist predecessors, and that renegade, truly capitalist people do not end up in control.

If true capitalism were to take root in the east, it might even spread to America. More than anything else, bureaucrats fear the insecurities of normal life in a free society, because the security of their guaranteed jobs has crippled their creativity, which is the primary means for the survival and flowering of civilization and the Human Race. They will have to learn to walk all over again.

B. THE SOCIALIST BUREAUCRACY: A CONSPIRACY WITHOUT LEADERS

It has been estimated that out of every five people, three of them must work extra to support the remaining two who are useless government employees or dependents.

The conspiracy between the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the N.S.A., the New Mexico Judiciary, and other bureaucratic, corporate-fascist entities, are united in the suppression of competing technologies, and the continual theft of ideas and wealth from inventors, thinkers, independent scientists, artists, writers, designers, etc.,—or their heirs, grantees, vendees, or devisees. These thefts perpetuate the corporate-fascist system, which is without actual leaders, although there are people who pose as purported leaders. How, you may ask, can such a vast organizational structure continue to function without leaders?

First of all, they have almost unlimited funds from us to waste in the process. Secondly, the organizational structure is maintained by a common belief in “collective superiority”—a religion of sorts—promulgated by the Illuminati, which means our bureaucracy is careening down the same road as the alleged leadership of the former Soviet Union, their flunkies. If one examines the so-called leadership structure of the Soviet state from its ineeption—now rendered more obvious due to the relative openness (“Glasnost”)—it is apparent that there NEVER WAS any leadership, but rather a mass of people who followed what were proffered by the Communist Party leadership as leaders.

The Soviet people followed this pseudo-leadership blindly, until it became apparent that there was no control or leadership, when the system was unable to feed them, and it imploded, as the people realized that all there was, was themselves as individuals, believing the BIG LIE told to them by Marx, Engels, Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin, all members of the Illuminati.

The wall of credibility was broken away by the harsh reality that the gigantic bureaucracy was bleeding the citizenry dry, while living high on the hog, while attempting to sustain the fictitious collectivist juggernaut. It was Immanuel Kant, Georg Hegel, Marx and Lenin who propagated the Illuminati lie...the half-baked idea that “...each idea contains the germ of its own dissolution”—and that contradictions exist in reality. But the untruth of that premise should now be corrected to say that “each FALSE idea contains the germ of its own dissolution”.

The germ of dissolution within the false premise of both the communist and corporate-state Illuminati philosophies, is that each fails to recognize the fact that man qua man’s primary means of survival is the creative process, and that an ideal society is one which maintains the conditions under which individuality—required for this human, individual process—is maximized. A society in which the “means of production” (i.e., incorrectly thought by the communists to mean all property, but which in reality is the individual) is in the hands of an imaginary, leaderless, collectivist state, ruled by a fictitious “mass, collective unconsciousness or consciousness”, is the diametric opposite of one which will foster maximum development of the individual creativity of its citizens.

The single greatest enemy of the creative process is dependency (created by fear and a desire for unearned security) which is the hallmark of any socialist state. Creativity, above all, demands the greatest degree of individual social, intellectual, and economic courage and independence from the shackles of any group. The Florentine Renaissance saw a rebirth of creativity and wealth, because of a rediscovery and emergence of the concept of individual rights, which liberated Europe from the shackles of Byzantine Christianity (comparable to today’s “religious right”) which fathered the Dark Ages.

Where people were burned at the stake or impaled if they uttered anything deviating from the ‘divine plan’, individualism and creativity were practiced only in secrecy, in a society of shared poverty. A long struggle by humanists eventually brought change, and we are still in the Renaissance, continuously struggling to maintain it, while various Illuminati mystics have sought to bring it to an end, and to usher in a Neo-Dark Age, with them as the secret elite.

There is a great difference between the “THIEVES of Light and Knowledge”, and the true “BRINGERS of Light and Knowledge”. The deluded mystical Illuminati Trilateralists falsely depict themselves as the “bringers of light and knowledge”, while other mystics (Christians, Jews, etc., unwittingly controlled by the Illuminati) openly make war against knowledge, as evil, based on their ignorant misconception that knowledge is the product of “Lucifer”. This variation creates a false contrast which makes the Illuminati look better. Meanwhile, the Illuminati confiscates the most valuable knowledge, required for them to control the world, gladly assisted by the conspiracy of insane bureaucrats, secret agents of the state, and the “religious right”, on their behalf.

The power-mad Trilateralists-Fascists sustain their power by theft, suppression and concealment of the most valuable technology and knowledge from the people, through the national security machinery of the state, in pursuit of the dual goal of state ownership of the purported means of production, and deprivation of the peoples’ means for achieving or maintaining freedom and democracy. They are attempting to return us to a dark age of mystical insanity, to worship the concepts of “collective consciousness” and “cooperation”, as “gods”, with the essential creative people as slaves, in a “New World Order” (actually an “Old World Order”) created and run by them.

The religious right is only a temporary pawn in the game. Naziism was their last attempt in this direction, but failed, because their leader, Hitler, like Napoleon, got out of hand, and bit off more than he could chew, just like the Soviet Communist leaders. How many chances does the Illuminati get? Their “Kali Ma” is insatiable, because more people, whom the Illuminati fear, are being born each day, while many are killed each day in fake wars.
The dissemination of knowledge which represents a threat to the secret dictatorship of the Trilateral corporate-state coercive monopolists, is no different than the Florentine humanists defying the fanatic psychopathic criminals who ran the Byzantine Empire.

The insanity of those Holy Roman Emperors was exposed by Plotinus, in his Secret History of the Byzantine Emperors, detailing how the Empress Theodora (an ex-whore and dancer from the Circo Massimo) horribly roasted her own child to death in a bronze ox. Her mate, the “Holy Roman Emperor” Justinian, drove 40,000 Mithraists into a hippodrome in Asia Minor, and exterminated them.2

The Trilateral Commissioners, like other bureaucrats and professional thieves, produce no wealth, goods, or services, and for all practical purposes, are “on welfare”. Yet these welfare bums use our money and resources to pay for the army of bureaucrats which serve the corporate-state, and not us, with their boots on our heads. All hail, Kali Ma!

Psychologically, socialist bureaucrats by nature are uncreative people who are instinctively intolerant of creative people, who constantly remind them of their own creative incompetence and socio-economic parasitism. It is as if certain defective humans are born to serve the Illuminati. A belief in bureaucratic-socialism is a thin veil covering one’s own feelings of self-hatred, fear, and creative insecurity.

In America, the existence of this velvet dictatorship is not felt through the iron fist of a Gestapo (short for Geheimnistadtspolizei, meaning “secret state police”), but rather through an invisible, deceptively diffused, choking web of bureaucratic regulatory entanglements and litigation, backed by police who go into action only when social ostracism, subterfuge and intimidation fail to obtain compliance, to use physical brutality to execute court or other bureaucratic orders. Though the people are aware of the problems, they are unable to specifically identify them, since the public media controlled by the Trilateral Commission continuously obliterates and confuses the facts.

There is no genuine support for bureaucracy by rational citizens. Only insecure, deluded, or power-mad bureaucrats take pride in such work, and only stupid or gullible citizens believe that these bureaucrats act in their best interest. In spite of the tintinnabulations of a vast army of yapping attorneys and bureaucrats of every guise, representing Trilateral interests, the people innately know the horrible truth, and it has made them weary, and it despairs them to know that they are not truly free.

It is not a thankless task they do, as some self-deluded bureaucrats may pretend; it is a “useless” task which throws monkey wrenches in everyone’s cogs. Anyone with ethics would either commit suicide out of remorse or loss of self esteem, or dismantle their agencies, resign, and never seek power again. How they resist the temptation for self-destruction, in the face of such massive public disdain, is an enigma. In the end, they will be martyrs to stupidity and injustice.

2 Otto Benesch, Art of the Northern Renaissance.
 

There is no accounting of the full extent of the vast waste created by the bureaucracy. Intelligent people will desert the bureaucracy, and find places in the private sector of society. It is all simply a matter of using one’s creativity to produce and survive, in a life one can enjoy and take pride in. This simple goal has been artificially made to seem more difficult by the chaos created by the Illuminati, mostly through those in public disservice.

C. TRAITOR JUDICIARY

Members of the American judiciary and bar associations have betrayed a sacred trust and duty to enforce our Bill of Rights, and are hated by the people for breaching that duty. A seemingly impenetrable wall has been gradually built up by the massive volume of past legal decisions and precedents, creating a barrier between the judiciary, and the people who are entitled to demand its sendees.

There is massive disrespect for the judiciary and legal profession, which is responsible for a great deal of the crime committed by helpless people, who see no other way out of their problems—created mostly by the government—since the)’ lack access to the system.

This one segment of our government is singly responsible for greater damage to us than all the other dangerous subversive and other traitorous elements in our history. They have intentionally misinterpreted our Bill of Rights and Constitution, pretending to misunderstand the concept of natural rights upon which our civilization is based. The general public disdains all lawyers and judiciary because of this, even though many of them as individuals do not have an articulate understanding of their rights. Many Americans who have the most profound (‘practical’ rather than theoretical) understanding of their natural rights, are among those we generally refer to as the “common, ordinary, working people of America”.

The failure by our judiciary to protest, stop, or reverse the erosion and destruction by government of constitutionally guaranteed protections of our inalienable rights, gives aid and comfort to the enemies of democracy (and the enemies are among us), and this negligence is recognized by the people as treasonous.

The only response to a more flagrant public hatred of lawyers, for example, was a widespread program of false propaganda which the bar associations unleashed on the American public in 1992, as if the only problem was one which could be cured by false propaganda, when the fact is, our judiciary panders only to those whose vested interests give them a stake in corporate socialism, because the newspaper and other media giants of the Illuminati control the political process through which they are elected. If they do not obey their bosses, replacements will promptly be found. For that reason, corrupt politicians are more persistent than honest ones, which are few and very far between.

A government which abuses the rights of the individual—any individual—because of his individuality, or his conflict with a voting consensus—will get no genuine respect in return. What may be misinterpreted as “respect”, is only fear. I think it was either Henry David Thoreau or Walt Whitman who said something like, “When the rights of the many shall take away the rights of the one, the rights of the many shall suffer”. It naturally follows that when the ‘rights of the many’ suffer, the power and jobs of those responsible should be abolished by the ‘many’.
 

The New Mexico judiciary often writes its civil opinions in a psychological lock-step which unerringly elevates procedural bureaucratic rules over just results, because a computer can do that for them. What else should one expect in a red-necked backwash? Their ‘judicial software’—designed by the corporate-state judiciary—gives them the most bureaucratic answers, and relieves them of the responsibility to think, sustaining the most extreme positions their supposed discretion allows, continually increasing government power.

Only judicial incompetents take such opinions—so lacking in merit, and corrupted by compromise—seriously. The gross lack of cognitive skills—in decisions produced in ‘canned English’, on legal word processors—exemplifies what I call the “new judicratic callousness”. This cognitive incompetence, which began to emerge particularly in the ‘60s, has finally oozed all the way to the top of the judicial garbage pail, as if the weight of so much fresh garbage has forced the most putrefied, liquefied slime to the top.

Teams of clerks, ‘paralegals’, and secretaries with word processors, mechanistically dish up superficially formal, substantively deficient opinions which are replete with juvenile smart-ass-type retorts—the only ‘original’ remarks in the opinions—to the protests of their victims. A computer can have no greater knowledge than its programmer or user, cannot replace human consciousness, and cannot truly conceal the lack of cognitive skills of a judge. We can do without the entire civil judicial system as it now stands. The lack of reasoning skills has finally percolated clear to the top, because the Illuminati wants it that way. They don’t want judges who think, but judges who obey.

When something does more harm than it does good, you simply don’t have it anymore. There is no inalienable right to file a civil suit, and no constitutional mandate to have a civil judicial system. The Constitution merely states the limitations of such a system, and since these have all been destroyed by the present Illuminati system anyway, let’s end it, and avoid future headaches, expense and injustice.

GAME NO. 1: THE NINTH AMENDMENT QUIET GAME

Like pleadings in a court, a patent application discloses one’s creative product. I wanted to plumb depth and intent...to confirm or deny my suspicion that I was being forced to deal with devious and evasive bureaucrats, out to help the Illuminati steal from us private ‘suckers’, with the help of a phalanx of those pompous corporate pederast-whores we call “corporate lawyers”, backed by beady-eyed, obedient, fascist. Dobermann-Pinscher-type political cops.

The State of New Mexico and its judiciary, for example, perceives its vested interests as being tied to the history of nuclear weapons development and the nuclear energy industry, as well as the petroleum and coal industries. It is also tied to the tradition of a perennial carpet-bagger “Santa Fe Ring” syndrome, payoffs and bribery, public works money scams, and bullshit politicians, all so easily manipulated by the corporate-state bag-men, the N.S.A., C.I.A., or F.B.I.

The system involves uranium open-pit or strip-mines, numerous ‘star wars’ projects, top secret bases and ‘experiments’, secret gestapos, weapons tests, and countless security measures and employees. All these magnify the opportunities, to manipulate the judiciary under clandestine “national security laws”. It also involves vast amounts of ‘federal’ (i.e. ‘our’) funds, as a reward to the “state” (bureaucracy), for following Illuminati orders. Befehl ist Befehl! Very few private citizens question the concept that the New Mexico judiciary has been ‘punked out’ by the Feds.

They finally pushed me over the edge. This book was a “landmark” decision, unlike those of judges who grovel in obedience to the government and its corporate masters. It is a significant departure which directly challenged the arrogance of power, and advocates a course of action by creative individuals, to bring about an eventual reversal of events against the corporate-state and a corrupt judiciary. It is a kind of ‘technological Ghandiism’, advocating a passive resistance by creative people, to the “consensus-fascist” system which utilizes deceit, secrecy, subterfuge, character assassination, and the manipulation of the judiciary and public opinion, to fabricate stare decisis and a consensus, used to support its own actions and rulings, usurping and concentrating more illegitimate power each day.

Such a fraudulent system is a threat to the survival of a truly free and creative civilization, which we have never fully attained, but can still possibly do so. We must keep our hopes alive, and cannot reserve our challenges until after the present system has already erected a system of gulags, in a role reversal to the policies of Stalin, Hitler, or Mao.

I long since came to the conclusion that there is no one out there responsible for “justice”, so I intend to mete some out myself, or at least to incite some inquiry which can lead to justice. The exclamation will undoubtedly be heard:

“Well, who does this guy think he is anyway? We’ll just tighten the screws on him, and shut him up for good.”

The answer is: I am an individual, independent, creative citizen, who is completely proud of what he is and what he advocates, with a completely clear conscience in respect to his motives and actions, despite the derogatory rulings of petty bureaucrats, none of whom can ever say the same. I only regret allowing myself to become a victim of the judiciary and its bosses.

As they say in the law, “Where there’s a wrong, there’s a remedy.” It remains to be seen that the ‘remedy’ is not in the law, but elsewhere. This book may be considered as my “96 Theses”, nailed to the government’s door (ala Martin Luther’s 96 theses nailed to the door of the cathedral), in a new kind of “reformation”, involving a new international philosophical movement of creative, autonomous individuals. I believe I represent the future in this endeavor.

A SYSTEM IN CONTEMPT OF OUR RIGHTS

Though my views on the legal profession may seem harsh to lawyers, I will say to them that the only hope for obtaining the future respect for their profession is by restoring the highest values within the legal profession, for the Bill of Rights, as absolute rights, which is precisely what the constitution says they are. Deal with it.

Since the litigation against me was incessant for over seventeen years, the judicial harassment, along with harassment of any kind encouraged from anyone else, amounted to a permanent denial of my rights to free speech and press. Since the public deserves to know the truth, it was imperative that no more time was wasted, and I published my first edition.

Those in the judiciary probably won’t like what I am saying, and would probably like to put me in jail to shut me up, although it has been their usual method to use more indirect tactics, such as citing me for contempt and fining me in the district courts to intimidate and impoverish me or silence my criticism, by constant vexatious orders, including some which not only struck pleadings, but physically removed them from the record to prevent me from further documenting their abuses. Their intent was clear, and my book has proved their assumptions wrong. The connections between attorneys, judges, and the CIA is well-known to some, and while I could point out specific people, it should suffice just to say that the CIA people are there, illegally, all over “city hall”.

Let there be no secret; while I respect what the bench is supposed to represent, I see almost no one on the bench who meets up to acceptable standards. As my rights (nature) permits, I have a personal contempt for gutless judges, because the bench deserves better, if it is to exist at all. I actually believe that more acceptable people might be found, despite what everyone says, though I could be wrong. Judges should be completely objective, fair, unbiased, and with unswerving adherence to the Bill of Rights, without regard to the race, religion, ideology, credo, or ‘accident of national origin’ of litigants—both plaintiffs and defendants, even “Texans”—or witnesses. We should settle for nothing less.

This selection should be made strictly by testing procedures which are adopted by Congress. Only those who score the highest should be our judges. This “objective system” would result in more representation by minorities anyway, because those who have been abused should be more inclined to take the Bill of Rights seriously, anyway, and should score higher on the tests. The highest standards for the judiciary are imperative. Though the ideal will always be diminished by practice, we must start at the highest level.

My personal contempt is for gutless, simpering weaklings, who appease sociopathic thug civil attorneys, and the criminal plaintiffs they represent, by allowing them to bend them like pretzels, to obtain fraudulent judgments and orders, and who lack the strength of character to do what is right, and yield to undue influences and pressures, to do what is wrong. I have contempt for those who have unjustifiably shown contempt for me, my rights, and the rights of all individuals, by implication. I have contempt for those who betray their sacred duty to preserve and protect the inalienable rights of the people. Even ‘second best’ is unacceptable.

It takes no courage by a judge or a court, to maliciously attack the rights of a single pro se individual, or to characterize him as “litigious”, because he seeks justice in protection of his rights, and restitution for wrongs done to him and his entire family. Such decisions are no more than cowardly repetitions of the acts of thugs whom the courts have a duty to sanction. In this way, the courts have damaged the rights of all individuals, by attacking the rights of one individual, and by joining with the gangsters and pandering to the worst elements in society. It places our courts right in bed with the criminals and other socialist free-loaders, including rich corporate ones, which makes it a form of prostitution.

Decisions by the judiciary which are unconstitutional for violation of our Bill of Rights, are void, for lack of jurisdiction or of legitimately delegated (or “delegatable”) authority from us (as the “consenting governed”), to render them. Such decisions deserve no respect, even if they are ‘unreversed’ ones, and are grounds for impeachment, because they represent more than mere opinion, but constitute official acts which consciously ignore or destroy particular constitutional inalienable rights of the people without any legitimate authority, as definitive “high crimes and misdemeanors” which are attempted to be passed off on us as “law”. Until we have a congress which is capable of identifying such acts and investigating and prosecuting the same, we will never restore our American Republic.

Perhaps it is obvious that I am not being “nice”. I am not in the mood for “nice”.

The time for “nice” is past. To put it more bluntly, there is nothing in my copy of the Constitution which says I have to be nice to blood-sucking parasites whom I hate, because they have violated my inalienable rights, my life’s work, my property rights, and savaged my family. I am not asking them, who owe me, for anything, since it is the resources of victims like me which feed their parasitic lifestyles.

The actions of the P.T.O. and the judiciary show that they are completely devoid of the spirit of the American system, or concern for human rights, as envisioned by the genius of Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin, both inventors. It was no coincidence that they and all the other signators of the Declaration of Independence died as paupers. In their day, the corporate-state system—called “mercantilism”—gave rise to the American Revolution. That revolution is betrayed multiply by the P.T.O., the judiciary, Congress, and the bureaucracy, who do not deserve “nice”. They deserve revolution.

The government has perverted our Charter of Liberty and made it into a tawdry wall decoration—a relic of the past—in pursuit of rigid, socialistic, bureaucratic convenience and “order”, truly in sycophancy to coercive monopolists (A.K.A., “mercantilists”), who are favored as their natural partners, in a collective ownership system, in which the government gets the power, the cartels get the money, and we producers of all the wealth, are naturally the slaves.

Public dissent has been perverted to illegal demands by a minority whose beliefs happen to mesh with corporate-statism, induced by the government to make their demands upon the judiciary and government, seeking to enforce their personal beliefs upon us, and to punish disobedience as a crime. This threat to return to a corporate-state socialist neo-dark age must be stopped.

These symptoms of the disintegration of our great society are caused by the misfeasance and malfeasance of the judiciary, bureaucracy, and government of, by, and for itself.

GAME NO. 2: THE ARTICLE ONE (Sec. 8, cl [8]) AND FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS PROPERTY GAME

I have something in store for the “creativity thieves”. “Really!” (they exclaim). I have done this before, and I know its works.

In anticipation of the present state of affairs, I took care to see that I had another, superior product “waiting in the wings” as it were, invented long before my birth by someone else, used in a new way, to obsolesce my invention, as my insurance from the anticipated theft. A creative inventor should always be able to “out-create” common idea thieves. While this may be untrue for many of the poor little inventors whose less prolific discoveries have real merit, yet are stolen nonetheless, leaving them without a remedy, because they have no funds for attorneys, this is not completely the case with myself.

Though I may lack the large sums required for attorneys—as pointed out by the crappy little patent examiner, though no interference had been declared—I am not a poor little inventor with only one idea; I have hundreds of them, and more to come, at my own discretion, on demand. I am rich in ideas, and rich in the ability to have them. They can take away one, and I’ll produce two more to replace it. Then I’ll see to it that foreign competitors receive the two new ones, just to punish the thieves in America. All I have to do is describe them. Foreign industrial spies are everywhere.

They scoop up every American suggestion as it is uttered, and proceed like ants to convert them to reality. I must warn the coercivists, that their days are numbered by the lag in progress their suppression has created. The tigers are at the gates, and who will make them respect natural rights, even yours, after you have set the example of abuse and neglect?

Since I am not rich and powerful (in terms of money and influence), the only recourse I now have is to exercise my right to determine the disposition of my more valuable, undisclosed inventions. They are mostly very simple, but highly unusual. For example, in comparison to the invention for which I sought a patent, they greatly depart from the relative degree of novelty. Consequently, I will not share my other inventions with the P.T.O., or with the sick government which employs it, and it will never control what else I have in my bag of creations. In this way, it has betrayed and caused the constitutionally ordained patent system to fail. I will also urge other inventors to refuse to play its game. It is the government which has, in fact, abandoned a legitimate patent system. People cannot be forced to invent, as shown by the example of the recently fallen communist states. Now perhaps creativity and freedom will evolve.

Like the New Mexico judiciary, the P.T.O. exaggerated bureaucratic technicalities, in order to circumvent the obvious merit involved, and attempted to treat everything as if it represented “nothing”. This was to protect the corporate thieves from the “doctrine of anticipation”, in their patent application, similar to the courts’ treatments in the case of the real estate and tort claims, to avoid the doctrine of res judicata. I expected both of these frauds, and was proven correct by the courts and P.T.O.

The implication can now be constructively drawn from the rulings that I am just a “frivolous type of person”, and that my other inventions—which I may transfer to foreigners— do not represent a loss of any valuable technology from this country, in the P.T.O.’s view, in which it deferred to the false validity of the New Mexico litigation. We can be confident in the ‘correctness’ of their rulings, since my credibility was systematically impugned, and there should be no cause for worry, and they should relax, since nothing I said had any merit, in their opinion.

I had intended to use the profits—under the remote possibility that my anticipations of corporate/government fraud turned out to be unwarranted—to finance further disclosures and patent applications on my other inventions, for the mutual benefit of myself, American industry, and the advancement of science. The P.T.O. and New Mexico judiciary stopped this meaningless process. Bravo, bureaucracy! The P.T.O. need not inquire into whether or not it delayed or obstructed scientific or technological progress, or abatement of the environmental/energy crisis, since none of my inventions could have helped to bring this about. It is the government, and it is never wrong.

ENERGY SLAVERY AND INVENTION THEFT

I decided in late April, 1991, that if I can’t have what is rightfully mine, I will not share my other inventions with the American government, and will file no more disclosures or applications. I conceived the particular invention in 1967. It is admittedly ‘low tech’ in comparison with my many other inventions, which range over several fields, and include new means of nautical, aeronautical, and automotive propulsion, numerous energy and power generators, new aircrafts and aerodynamic applications, boats, engines, electric motors, wind, solar, magnetic, super-conductor, and laser applications, semiconductors, manufacturing processes, chemical and metallurgical discoveries and processes, as well as numerous types of “safe” nuclear electric power generators, all but one of which uses no radioactive materials whatsoever.

They eliminate the need for a nuclear regulatory commission, or “W.I.P.P.”, as well as all the monumental expense, “busy-work” jobs for bureaucrats, and other associated waste, problems, and expense to taxpayers and productive people. In general, my inventions are to liberate people from corporate energy and political slavery. In reality, no ethical person has anything to lose by the widespread use of such inventions. This entire freight train of ideas was derailed and abandoned by the P.T.O. and the National Security Agency (of the Trilateral Commission).

When Nikola Tesla took almost the same approach as I have, the.F.B.I., with the aid of a specially trained German S.S. nurse, tortured him to death, learned the location of all his secret files, and impounded them under the “Alien Properties Act”, even though he was an American citizen. Those secrets ended up in the hands of the Nazis, thanks to our F.B.I. That was in 1943. The Nazis traded the materials to the Rockefellers and the U.S. government, during a 1945 stalemate, and a large part of them are now stored in Los Alamos, New Mexico.

New Mexico could have built itself a new ‘clean’ industry future around my discoveries, but its officials viciously kicked me in the teeth. This shows how ignorant people can be led to cut off their noses to spite their faces. Some of you readers may be familiar with “...the Bear, the Bison, and the Muskrat...” (the code names for the top “Soviet” bombers in 1957—designed by an American, rejected by Congress, and, as we should not be surprised—sold by him to the Russians).

New Mexico won’t make a dime off me now, or create a single job, and can continue its self-made bondage to government jobs and the large corporations, for judicially abusing me and damaging my credibility. For this they get nothing! Blinded by petty jealousy, they couldn’t see that they were being “motivated” at their own level by the CIA. The issue is not what “this Texan” gets or doesn’t get, but rather who gets what I still have, and it won’t be them. For slumbering lethargically away on their rights, people must buy foreign-made goods which are superior to American goods, all because they failed to control the corporate state.

For example, in 1980,1 conducted what is now called “cold fusion” research. I obtained pronounced heat results using several methods, one of which requires no input energy once the reaction is initiated. I do not describe it as “fusion”. The process—now well-known, because later explored in Utah—was not good enough in comparison to better ways I developed, so I abandoned it. I then intentionally leaked the process—with the addition of some ingenious misinformation—to one whom I suspected to be a spy, because I had already been ripped off several times, and wanted the personal satisfaction of watching the thieves turn slowly in the wind of ridicule, as they choked on their own snot.

In the form I leaked it, the process is a very inefficient use of the true principles involved. It will, when properly designed and constructed, produce a continuous, external current of 50 KW, almost indefinitely, using a non-consumed, cheap, easily obtained, 1-mole fuel sample. The Utah experiments yielded relatively smaller net gains in energy, because the scientists were attempting to proceed according to accepted methods. I watched them beat their brains out unsuccessfully trying to explain it, with pleasure. Of course, there are readers who will disbelieve me, refusing to concede that an amateur scientist could explain what the experts have failed to explain.

The answer can be found in my book, Occult Ether Physics. As it turned out, the spy, who is still a friend of mine, was working with some Mormons who were unconnected to the Trilateralist rats who had ripped me off before. He was sincerely doing what he thought to be the right thing, by taking the information to people who at least had the guts to try. No mon, no fun, I won. Poetic justice. They shouldn’t have stolen my secrets, and denied credit where it was due.

The spy is to be credited however, for properly interpreting the obvious undermining of my credibility by the state/Trilateralists, all the way back in 1980, as proof of the value of my inventions, and for placing the discovery into the public domain in the most spectacular way, which I believe was their intent. They sought my secrets after a very powerful New Mexican had benefitted from a 1979 theft of one of my inventions, which worked very well. That beneficiary will eventually suffer a loss as a result of my present actions, and the “domino effect” applies to aligned interests.

Another good example: My cousin (a mathematical and electrical and computer engineering design genius), was pursuing an electrical engineering degree, and was forced by circumstances to drop out of college in 1957, taking an approximately $2.00 per hour job with Texas Instruments, in Dallas. Within a few months—when he was nineteen—six full-fledged engineers were required to execute his designs. In 1957, he showed me his original circuit design for the integrated circuit, drawn on a small scratch pad. For this discovery, Texas Instruments gave him a $100.00 bonus.

This circuitry was incorporated into America’s first satellite, and was a great “miniaturization” breakthrough. Credit was shared among two of six engineers who worked under Mark, building the things he designed.

In 1970, T.I. fired him, because he had no Ph.D.; he received no credit, and only a pathetic wage for his billion-dollar discoveries. T.I. also later marketed his personal, hand-built computer, which he left in his office when he moved out of it, as their “Table Top Computer”. He received nothing for that either, and did not fight for his rights, although he now works for a company he created, designing perhaps the world’s best medical computers, which are used by the foremost medical facilities, including the Mayo Clinic, the Einstein Institute, and the San Francisco Medical Center. He should be at least a multi-millionaire, but because he is a pre-occupied, somewhat reticent, creative genius, his rightful millions went to common thieves. So much for Mark Daniel Broussard, genius.

The first major invention I lost, was one I invented in 1948, at age ten. My own father gave it to the patent thief. The thief filed his application for patent in 1950, just after my twelfth birthday. This invention is everywhere. The second major invention loss was attributable to my own negligence, by allowing a friend to use it on his competition drag-racer, built in the shop of Jim Hall, the well known car builder/racer, in Midland. Texas, in 1967.

It was appropriated by Hall and ended up at G.M., and was initially used on the Hall-built Ford Chaparral, Grande Prix, CanAm, and Indy cars driven by the Unser family of Albuquerque, where Jim Hall is from. The discovery is used throughout the high performance automotive and racing field today, and has even appeared on mam high-end sports cars. I discovered and tested the first automotive “ground-effects” system, when I was fourteen years old, in 1952.
 

Such situations as these are commonplace. The few stories the public hears about, involve inventors who survive the onslaught of corporate intrigue and power, and find competent legal representation. From creativity studies3, it is known that creative geniuses are often neurotic to the point of being semi-disabled, as a direct result of their creative abilities, and vice-versa (that certain disabilities and illnesses are often related to a higher creativity)4. In fact, a “neurotic phase” in the creative cycle, is generally recognized.

This phase usually precedes the “productive phase”. In such phases, the consciousness is often altered to increase the probability for a “bisociation of two or more previously unrelated matrices, on the pre-conscious level”5. The phases are often intentionally self-induced by creative individuals, as the price they must pay for their creative productivity. While we all benefit from this phenomenon, the inherent naivete or disabilities of inventors makes them vulnerable to con-artists, the government, doctors, lawyers, and corporate thieves.

Where such individuals are looted from and denied reward, they may afterward pursue generally four courses of action, which are:

1. to continue in a more or less permanent state of neurosis, in which they no longer produce; or

2. continuing as usual, masochistically getting their teeth repeatedly kicked out; or

3. becoming ‘normal’, and never creating again; or

4. continuing to use their creative process to obtain revenge and to change the system. (I have opted for this last alternative, and advocate that other creative people do the same.)

It is in the interest of everyone to see that our creative geniuses receive just rewards for the work they do. Failure to do so will leave our problems unsolved. If society punishes them, it is punishing itself.

TRIUMVIRATE OF INJUSTICE

The P.T.O. is the “Vacuum Cleaner of Creative Minds” for the cartels. The judiciary is the “Extinguisher of Competing Claims” for the cartels. The lawyers are the “Hit Men of Problem People” for the cartels. The cumulative effects of this triumvirate of injustice, is to enslave humanity, and to bog it down in its problems, with the cartels posing as the “saviors apparent”, by dosing out whatever stolen “solutions” it chooses, at the most opportune moments of prolonged agony—usually created by them—calculated to extract the greatest degree of continued dependency. This cycle can be broken and rectified only by restoring justice for those who will provide the solutions.

Ironically, the P.T.O. may find itself unknowingly registering some of my inventions in the future, under international patent treaties, but may never know which ones were mine. They’ve already issued several patents on some of my inventions anyway, stolen by their friends. My 100 or so other inventions will still benefit mankind, with the exception that American corporate thieves and others will be eliminated from the major action, by those of my choosing, who will receive the benefits in the particular fields of application.

3 Creativity and Learning (an anthology edited by Jerome Kagan, the Beacon Press, Boston, 1967).

4 Dr. Edgar Mayer, Genius and Prolonged Illness, WISDOM MAGAZINE, Vol. 3, No. 25, May 1958.
5 Jerome Kagan (supra).
 

Not only will the American corporate thieves be deprived of the opportunity for theft, but will be deprived of profits, and will be punished by their foreign competitors. Didn’t they ‘trade with the enemy’ during WWII? Turn abouts fair play.

The only track record I have in patents is for being ripped off. I hold no patents, so, at my option, it is only a matter of determining who gets to rip me off, by giving the edge to competitors of the ‘domestic rats’, rather than to allow them to rip me off, through the P.T.O. or other con-artists. The thieves who have profited from my prior inventions will know this is no joke.

For a prolific, yet relatively poor, inventor like myself, there is no protection under the U.S. patent system as it now stands. I have so many good inventions that there is no way for me to proceed with applications and disclosures, because the system is almost too expensive and time-consuming, even to process a single application, much less over a hundred. And the answer is not to provide federal funding for an army of legal creeps in Washington, to process the applications of “poor inventors”, because that would only create increased abuse and leakage of patent secrets to the Illuminati.

I could be swamped with interference proceedings on a single application, leaving all other applications abandoned on bureaucratic technicalities, such as failure to respond in time, caused by judicial interferences. The P.T.O. has stated its rigid position on such interferences in my first application, and would not consider them, so I will no longer consider them.

The P.T.O. therefore, always has the option of throwing the game in favor of the corporations, to unjustly enrich and empower them. The system as it now stands cannot meet the constitutional requirements, is unjust, and like the judiciary, will collapse under the weight of its own self-created bureaucratic flab, duplicity, incompetence, and deadwood.

Where some of my inventions are composed of several novel elements, each of which would support an independent application, requiring conceivably months of work to segregate to the satisfaction of the P.T.O., the problem is further complicated. In the case of one single application, over three years and considerable work and expense have been consumed. The U.S. government in general is to blame for this quandary. I cannot leave my work stored in notebooks, or in my mind, only to have the P.T.O. reject a future application as abandoned, on the basis that I have ‘secreted’ it away, when in reality, the past shows that I can’t secret something away which I never had an adequate opportunity to disclose, or to protect after disclosure. They won’t consider such a defense, since I tried it and know. So the P.T.O. has its rules, and I have mine.

I was plagued by Trilateralist/Illuminati invention-thieves, who looked for opportunities to steal other multi-million-dollar discoveries so they could get filthy rich. while I languished away in poverty and legal problems created by them, with my credibility destroyed by the corporate-state fascist judicial yeggs.

Therefore, I will simply see to it that the general public or foreign competitors end up with my inventions one way or the other, and there is nothing the corporate state can do to prevent it. If I am to be ripped off, I appoint the public or foreigners, or both, as beneficiaries, rather than my own government and its fascist corporate partners. I had rather give my discoveries away even to enemies than to see traitors profit from them. In the future, this writing can be referenced in retrospect, to confirm the fact that a warning was given beforehand, stating how the problem developed, and that the government refused to take any action until it was too late.

I now lay the blame at the feet of the P.T.O. and the American Judiciary (particularly in New Mexico), and the manipulatory corporate-fascist U.S. government.
 

History often shows in retrospect, injustice, stupidity, or wrongdoing. I don’t relish being viewed in the future as a tragic loser who was ripped off without a fight, so this testimonial fixes the blame for future problems, enabling the future to judge whether the government was rightfully convicted by me, and whether the ends of true justice were served. Those who put my name in their judgments will now have some of their names placed in mine, in the court of public opinion. Now it is their turn to defend themselves.

GAME NO. 3: THE FIRST AMENDMENT END-RUN GAME (A.K.A. THE Ol’ STATUTE OF LIBERTY PLAY)

But these actions (or non-actions) are insufficient to adequately punish the corporations or the U.S. government and its judiciary, or to hold their feet to the fires of creativity, so I have yet a third part to my revenge, which involves the most symbolic of all invention rip-offs. If it previously appeared to be of value to anyone, to deprive me of that one patent, or to deprive me of some small property holdings and rights in rural New Mexico, or to smash my life, that value will eventually be seen as a huge blunder on the part of the P.T.O. and the New Mexico Judiciary, which directly triggered

1. my refusal to make further disclosures to the P.T.O. of my other inventions

2. my transfer of inventions to foreign competitors

3. my publishing of my research and inventions

4. the publishing of this crazy old book, SPACE ALIENS FROM THE PENTAGON: FLYING SAUCERS ARE MAN-MADE ELECTRICAL MACHINES, © Wm. R. Lyne, 1993, 1995, 1999.

CREDIBILITY ROULETTE

Without actual proof of what I assert, the government will have to be content with the unanswered question of whether or not I really have the inventions and knowledge I claim, and whether their conduct will be worth it in the long run. The government will just have to gamble with my credibility, and take its own risks as to whether my punishment will be real or fantasy. We can play “credibility roulette”, with this book (the pistol) pointed at its head (the most valuable secret of the Illuminati).

It is not necessary that my book be taken seriously by the government, since, in response to my legal pleadings, the legal numskulls said that my requests that my constitutional rights be observed, protected and enforced, were all just “fantasy and fiction”, and “frivolous”. In the government’s view, this book should be considered as written with “tongue-in-cheek”, and not intended seriously. Meanwhile, you who are individuals (the “reading public”) can examine my book, do some research and experiments, and decide for yourselves its value, in spite of the Illuminati’s attempts to mold your thoughts beforehand, with over forty years of BIG LIES.

Bureaucrats naturally underestimate the power of the individual, since they are collectivists who lack a concept of individuality. I would have said this much sooner had it not taken me so long to gain the opportunity between harassments. Even though I am aware of the danger to my family and myself, and since there have already been several murder attempts, any one of which could have succeeded, I say this while there is an opportunity to do so, to remove their motive from the equation. Besides, it is really they who are afraid of the truth.

I have no duty to exclusively share my ideas and discoveries with a degenerate government which maintains illegitimate power by punishing, impoverishing, stealing from and enslaving individual creative people whom the government sanctions as its victims, through perverted laws, awarding the victims’ productivity to itself and its corporate thief partners, under the banners of the “public good”, “justice”, and “national security”. Government-backed coercive monopolies are criminal conspiracies, which should be prosecuted, abandoned, denied support by all people, and deprived of the fraudulent and illegitimate use of our government by consent of the governed, as a deceitful and fraudulent means of private coercive control and power.

If American citizens are unable to dismantle this system, by withdrawing consent they never gave in the first place, by deprival of the legal method to do so, creative people must now create a unity of purpose, to “go on strike”, to use the ultimate power of individuals to deprive the system of power, for treasonously militating against the most fundamental human right of all, the right to the freedom and protections which are essential to the exercise of the individual creative process by all, in a creative and abundant civilization, rather than one ruled by the fraud, deceit, extortion and the brute force of coercive monopolists, through bureaucrats they control, who should each have to earn their own bread, rather than to mooch from us.

The thing which has made A