from Aetherometry Website
should we again choose to speak of an aether? Isn’t that like
resurrecting the notion of God, a single God, in scientific terms?
Einstein himself supposed, until well into the 1920s, that there could and should be an Aether and that, in all likelihood, it would prove to be gravitational. Later, of course, a flawed geometrical analysis more than satisfied him, and there no longer remained a need, in his mind, to think of the gravitational field as an actual energy flux. Instead, his theorizing resorted to deformations of a quasi-static geometry.
Einstein felt legitimized, in a sense, to do this because he
thought that this was where the ’technologized’ senses, the laboratory
experiments and the Gedanken experiments inevitably led. But this
turn in his thinking is, in a sense, a betrayal of his earlier
positions. And, to this day, those who speak of an aether are only
able to conceive of it as an electromagnetic reality.
This was truly a novel insight. We drew attention to this little-remembered fact of Einstein’s thought in our article entitled Consequences of the Null Result of the Michelson-Morley Experiment, which appeared in issue #38 of Infinite Energy, and as a result, slowly, we are beginning to see this realization being taken up in other articles as well. Likewise, Herman Oberth believed that the gravitational field was an energetic reality that could be controlled and engineered - though not by electromagnetic means.
And Reich, of course, also stood apart from the crowd and introduced the term ’orgone’ in order to designate a domain of energy which could not be confused with any notion of an electromagnetic aether or massbound electric fields.
But just because the Aether is not electromagnetic does not mean that a concept of an Aether properly enunciated does not have a genealogical line and a proper place in the structure of physics. One could begin this ungrateful task by seizing the break introduced by Reich in conceptualizing a dynamic Aether: previously the Imponderable was construed as having mass but not weight; yet, based upon the identity of inertial mass and gravitational mass (or mass-equivalent wavelength, in Aetherometry) - the very identity which was cardinal for Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity - Reich was brought to realize that the Imponderable is not just weightless, but also noninertial and thus massfree.
lies the break, an epistemological rupture that puts into
perspective the error in Einstein’s interpretation of the Jeans
relation, E = mc2. As B. Russell put it, it might appear that mass
and energy are very different things, "but it has turned out that
energy is the same thing as measured mass". Well, it is not. Mass,
like wavelength, is but one of the (possible) constituents of energy
and, what is yet more fundamental, energy exists in massless forms
where the function filled by mass in mass-energy, or in the world
of Matter, is filled instead by a free wavelength function.
If the manifolds of Space and Time must be thought of as distinct and independent from mass or mass-energy, independent, in a word, from the world of Matter, from its inertia and its gravitational fields, then the very energetic envelope of these two manifolds bears no electric property and yet generates Space and Time. Indeed, no one has ever shown that production of Space and Time is of necessity an electric process.
This short and
concise thought alone indicates the cosmological breadth of the
problem since, as Aetherometry proposes, the nature of the OR and DOR radiations is precisely that they are electric forms of radiant
energy, bearing ambipolar and massfree charge through the medium of
longitudinal waves. Likewise, to add to the posing of this concrete
problem, phenomena of ’latent heat’, antigravitation,
cloud-formation and the acquisition of higher- order states of the
intrinsic potential energy of molecules, etc, all betray or indicate
the action of a massfree energy flux which is not electrical, even
if it can and does interconvert with ambipolar massfree energy.
encompasses both electric and nonelectric forms of massfree energy,
with the former being ambipolar and not monopolar. All monopolar
charges are massbound, ie bound to inertial charge carriers. All massfree charges are ambipolar, and they may have energy which
belongs to one of two spectra, OR or DOR. Orgone is therefore simply
a subtype of aether energy, affine with the living. Moreover, the
cosmological problems raised by the Aether essentially concern not
its electric formation, but its nonelectric energy form, and how it
produces sensible thermal photons with the temperature of the
microwave Background Radiation (CBR).
But the Aether is an energetic reality that - even
without knowing anything about orgone accumulators,
electroscopes, orgone motors, Tesla coils, etc.- we must still wonder about with
the tools of science. For as soon as we have to contend with the
reality of a cosmic microwave background radiation filling the
entirety of Space, or attempt to understand Space and
of Relativity, the insistent questions of both ’latent heat’ and the Aether resurface.
The deeper reason why the envelope of Space and Time does not and will not collapse is found precisely in the ’antigravitic’ or ’repulsive’ property of ’latent heat’. This is the deeper secret of it - which it has been Aetherometry’s task both to unravel and to document. So if we are to address the problems of Space and Time as functions of energy, we must first understand they are functions of that ’latent’ energy in massfree form.
It is precisely this ’latent’ energy in massfree form which, as scientists continue to attempt to cool down
an atom in a trap to absolute zero, keeps stubbornly resisting;
keeps using that atom as a pick-up antenna for the capture of
’latent heat’ which the atom persistently converts into the little
bursts of sensible heat it releases and which, for a mass of atoms,
impede the researcher from ever being able to bring any atom to
absolute zero. There is, in other words, a minimal thermal heat that
atoms constantly propagate, vibrating with the waves of ’latent
heat’ that produce and unfold Space and Time.
In reality the planets are all buoyant in a ’fluid’ which keeps them apart just as much as it brings them together. Gravitationally speaking, they only come together, as Reich pointed out in the context of superimposition, in the same Space but at different times. This is one of the meanings of phase Space and Time, where there can be synchronization without simultaneity or strict synchronism - a coincidence in virtual Space with an interval in Time for two different superimposing segments of the Aether lattice.
Two different pieces of the lattice for the same ’ideal Space’. The positions are apparently the same but Space is effectively different, even if it appears to be the same or identical. Space is a property of energy and, as Time intervenes, the flux of energy is necessarily different for the same apparent relative position. Space is constantly recreated. The ultimate pool of Aether energy consists of the antigravitic property of ’latent heat’.
Space completely devoid of Matter, at as high a vacuum as may
be achieved, where virtually no types of radiant energy are to be
found - that pure conjunction of Space and Time that supports no
life is nevertheless energetic, and it is this unceasing flux that
permits its unfolding and its expansion as Space and
quantum of ’latent’ energy alone synchronizes vast quantities of
energy in its perpetual production of Space and Time, consistently
and homogeneously to our perception - were we to arrive there as a ’perfect subject or observer’.
We are constrained to think this way, if
we seek the terrain of science. This is the very challenge - the
point when we will always abandon Relativity. For, if we are to
defend science as the domain of the quantitative, it is the
arbitrariness of the quantitative that we must exorcise by
introducing the qualitative, beginning with the physical - such as
the physical effects of distinct energy forms, and so on - to embody
the physical boundaries of that quantitative. Without this task,
there is no science, only chimeric thought.
Before we can talk of any of the other properties - gravitic, electric, thermal, electromagnetic, ionizing, etc. - we
first have to talk about the properties of ’latent heat’, because it
is these that concretely support the continuum of Space and Time.
The reason why there is a microwave background is precisely because
everywhere there is conversion of totally unfolded, so to speak,
pure Space and Time, pure continuity, into folds.
And since all hadrons are composites of
are, simply put, farts. But to imagine that the Aether in its
entirety is composed only of farts is really, we have to say, an
idea for farts. And we could also say that this is precisely what’s
wrong with Physics. The aether is not composed of farts, it is not
composed of photons and it is not electromagnetic. And it is not
static a fortiori. The Aether is composed of the
Imponderable Dark where there is only pure motion in a smooth space, whether that
motion is electrified or not. Everything else arises from it.
Gravitational fields are specific fields of massfree energy that are affected to mass-energy in a state of flux, and need to be regenerated constantly for that mass-energy to conserve itself. We can certainly conceive of Space and Time in the absence of Matter. But what is it that makes Space and Time? If they are energetic components - the manifold properties of energy itself - they have to have an energy structure, they have to possess wave functions that are no different in type from any other wave functions associated with known energetic manifestations.
Why should we suddenly privilege a cosmological perspective and transform it into an affair of geometry and go the way of General Relativity? Why? Why should we do that?
Especially if one is committed to a treatment of Space and Time as properties of energy, this is definitely not the way to go. For topology will certainly teach us nothing about the energetic relation of Space with Time, or about the synchronisms of aether energy in its various forms.
But it is an altogether different matter to understand ’latent heat’, to understand how molecules have different capacities to obtain it, how they trap it in the microatmospheres surrounding them to produce the critical effects of the Van der Waals force law (to be replaced by the far more precise Aetherometric treatment) and to understand how, in the context of these different manifestations of ’latent heat’, we find a common denominator which reduces to the cosmological functions of pure smooth Space and pure Simultaneity in the absence of any Matter, any charge, any electromagnetic fields, any radiative fields save the radiative field that produces both Space and Time. It is here we find the naked reality of the Aether as massfree latent energy. Beyond the darkness lies the Dark.
If the Animate energy of the Aether is the Dark and the domain of ambipolar electricity, the very domain shared by OR and DOR, there is still a darker, deeper abyss, the Inanimate.
It is the greatest of all molecules - since it composes the very envelope of Space and Time that we perceive as the essence of our existence in the world around us.