| 
			  
			  
			  
			
			
			 by Mike Adams
 
			the Health Ranger 
			May 27, 2010from 
			NaturalNews Website
 
			  
			  
			  
			The
			
			Alliance for Natural Health, a 
			nonprofit organization committed to protecting access to natural and 
			integrative medicine, has recently come up with a Congressional bill 
			designed to stop government censorship of truthful, scientific 
			health claims about natural foods and herbs, and restore free speech 
			to natural health.  
			  
			The Free Speech About Science Act 
			(FSAS), 
			also known as HR 4913, will allow manufacturers and producers to 
			reference peer-reviewed, scientific studies that highlight the 
			health benefits of a particular food or herb that they grow or sell.
 For too long, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 
			and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) 
			have blatantly censored the truth about food, herbs and dietary 
			supplements. These government agencies are supposed to be protecting 
			public health and well-being, but they accomplish precisely the 
			opposite by actively censoring the truth about natural products and 
			working to keep the public ignorant about the health benefits 
			of nutritional products.
 
			  
			It's all part of the plan to prop up the 
			profits of 
			Big Pharma by eliminating the 
			competition.
 
			  
			  
			Current law 
			restricts health claims to drugs only
 
			The FDA says, ridiculously, that only pharmaceutical drugs are 
			capable of preventing or treating disease.
 
			  
			Even though this is scientifically 
			false, the agency has structured the rules to categorize anything 
			that treats or prevents disease as a drug. So if you eat walnuts, 
			and those walnuts lower high cholesterol (which they do), the FDA 
			declares your walnuts to be "drugs."
 Existing law dictates that if anything is advertised as providing 
			health benefits without the FDA's approval, it's automatically 
			considered to be an "unapproved drug", even if it's a common, 
			everyday food like walnuts, cherries, grapes or oranges.
 
 Amazingly, references to peer-reviewed scientific studies are not 
			allowed to be made by companies without permission from the FDA 
			because the agency considers this to be an illegal health claim. So 
			if you sell walnuts, and your website merely links to published 
			scientific studies that describe the cholesterol-lowering benefits 
			of walnuts, then you can be threatened, arrested, imprisoned and 
			fined millions of dollars by the FDA for selling "unapproved drugs."
 
 If you flee the country, you can be then be listed on INTERPOL as an 
			international fugitive wanted for "drug offenses."
 
			  
			This is exactly what happened to Greg 
			Caton, who was recently kidnapped from Ecuador by
			
			
			U.S. agents working on behalf of the FDA, 
			brought back to the USA against his will, and sentenced to federal 
			prison where he remains to this day.
 
			  
			  
			The FDA thinks 
			walnuts are drugs
 
			If you're skeptical that what I'm saying here is true, take a look 
			at
			
			the warning letter the FDA sent to Diamond 
			Food, Inc. back in February concerning the health claims 
			the company had been making about its walnuts.
 
 Diamond Food, Inc., a large producer of nuts and nut products, had 
			put some information on its website about the health benefits of 
			walnuts (which are rich in omega-3 fatty acids).
 
			  
			Some of this information included the 
			following statements (all of which are verifiably true): 
				
					
					
					"Studies indicate that the 
					omega-3 fatty acids found in walnuts may help lower 
					cholesterol; protect against heart disease, stroke and some 
					cancers; ease arthritis and other inflammatory diseases; and 
					even fight depression and other mental illnesses."
					
					"[O]mega-3 fatty acids inhibit 
					tumor growth that is promoted by the acids found in other 
					fats..."
					
					"[I]n treating major depression, 
					for example, omega-3s seem to work by making it easier for 
					brain cell receptors to process mood-related signals from 
					neighboring neurons."
					
					"The omega-3s found in fish oil 
					are thought to be responsible for the significantly lower 
					incidence of breast cancer in Japanese women as compared to 
					women in the United States." 
			All of these statements are true and 
			have been demonstrated in various scientific studies about omega-3s.
			 
			  
			In fact, the University of Maryland has 
			a
			
			complete reference page about the benefits of 
			omega-3s that verifies the statements made by Diamond 
			Food. Sixty-five different scientific studies are cited on that 
			reference page alone!
 But apparently the FDA has little concern with truth and science, 
			because the agency wrote in its warning letter to Diamond that,
 
				
				"[b]ecause of these intended uses, 
				your walnut products are drugs... they are not generally 
				recognized as safe and effective for the above referenced 
				conditions."  
			It goes on to say that,  
				
				"they may not be legally marketed 
				with the above claims in the United States without an approved 
				new drug application." 
			When all was said and done, Diamond was 
			essentially coerced into removing virtually all the truthful 
			information about the health benefits of walnuts from its website in 
			order to stay in compliance with the FDA's ridiculous demands.
 So when science discovers the amazing health-promoting and healing 
			abilities of natural, whole foods, you are not allowed to actually 
			tell people about it. If you do, those foods automatically become 
			unapproved drugs, according to the FDA, and they are subject to 
			seizure. This is how the FDA enforces nutritional ignorance across 
			America.
 
			  
			The agency is actually an ANTI-EDUCATION 
			group of knowledge destroyers who want the American people to remain 
			ignorant of the health benefits of natural foods and supplements.
 
			  
			  
			FDA 
			flip-flop on the walnut issue
 
			What's interesting about this recent Diamond walnut case is that, 
			back in 2004, the FDA (sort of) approved
			
			a request made on behalf of the California 
			Walnut Commission to include information about the 
			benefits of walnuts for lowering cholesterol and reducing the risk 
			of coronary heart disease.
 
 The petition to the FDA included references to scientific 
			information that backs these claims (which were largely rejected by 
			the agency), but it did allow a modified version of the claim to be 
			made that included the phrase "Supportive but not conclusive 
			research shows...".
 
			  
			Some other details included a reference 
			to eating a diet low in saturated fat.
 But in the Diamond case, the FDA decided to launch an all-out attack 
			on true health claims about walnuts, despite comprehensive evidence 
			that they are extremely beneficial to your health in many 
			scientifically-proven ways.
 
 
			  
			  
			The FDA does 
			not believe in nutrition, period!
 
			It's important to note here that the FDA believes there is no such 
			thing as any food, vitamin, herb or supplement that has ANY 
			beneficial effect on the human body.
 
			  
			Sadly, this outrageously ridiculous and 
			indefensible position has become the law of the land in the USA.
 All foods are inert, the FDA claims. And the vitamins, 
			minerals and phytochemicals in those foods have no effect on your 
			body. This impossible belief is what the FDA continues to maintain 
			as "scientific" fact.
 
 But it's obvious to anyone with a couple of brain neurons still 
			firing that the FDA's position is pure madness. Of course foods have 
			beneficial health effects on the human body!
 
			  
			Foods contain more than mere calories... 
			they are storehouses of
			
			phytochemicals and nutrients that 
			have medicinal effects on the body.
 
			  
			  
			The FDA is 
			good at giving lip service
 
			It's important to note that a new drug application is not the only 
			way certain health claims can be made.
 
			  
			Similar to how the California Walnut 
			Commission issued its request, producers and manufacturers can 
			request permission from the FDA to make certain health claims about 
			products, and the agency makes it sound as if it is more than 
			willing to approve such claims as long as proper evidence is given.
			 
			  
			But in reality, no matter how much 
			evidence is provided to back a set of claims, it's almost never 
			enough for the FDA to actually approve them.
 Omega-3s are one of the most 
			studied nutrients in recent years, but the FDA apparently considers 
			all this research useless. It hides behind all kinds of legal mumbo 
			jumbo in defending its position to reject credible science about the 
			health benefits of omega-3s. To anyone paying attention, it's 
			becoming abundantly clear that the agency is completely irrational 
			in the way it approaches the regulation of health claims and the 
			definition of a "drug."
 
 Based on its track record of how it handles truthful health claims, 
			it's also clear that the FDA doesn't actually care about the truth. 
			The agency has decided that only drugs prevent and treat disease, 
			and that's the end of it. So only those companies that complete its 
			expensive drug application process will be granted permission to 
			make health claims - and the only organizations with the funding to 
			do this are drug companies!
 
 It's sort of like the old floating witch test: Throw the suspected 
			witch in a pond. If she floats, she's a witch and gets burned at the 
			stake. If she sinks, she wasn't a witch... may she rest in peace 
			after drowning. The test is rigged for failure by the "authorities."
 
			  
			And yes, the FDA's assault on dietary 
			supplements is a metaphorical witch hunt.
 
			  
			  
			FDA threatened 
			cherry growers in 2006
 
			Of course this isn't the first time the FDA has gone on a witch hunt 
			to stop health claims from being made about healing foods. Back in 
			2006,
			
			the FDA demanded that 29 companies 
			cease making claims about the health benefits of cherries.
 
 Of course all the claims were true and backed by scientific studies, 
			but this didn't matter to the FDA or the FTC, which acts as the 
			enforcement arm of the FDA.
 
			  
			The agencies threatened to take action 
			against these companies if they didn't comply with removing the 
			health claims, indicating that they would even go so far as to seek 
			a court order to seize the products that were in violation.
 An interesting fact about this case is that many of the scientific 
			studies that supported the health claims being made were funded by 
			none other than the USDA, another arm of the U.S. federal 
			government. Talk about a bureaucratic failure!
 
 All of this seems almost too crazy to actually be true, but it's all 
			quite real, I assure you. It happens all the time.
 
			  
			Millions of taxpayer dollars are spent 
			trying to reclassify food as drugs, censor truthful health claims 
			and rid the market of safe, healthy items like raw dairy products. 
			Meanwhile, drug companies are fraudulently marketing dangerous 
			chemical medications that injure and kill millions of people every 
			year around the world.  
			  
			But these chemicals are, of course, 
			"generally recognized as safe and effective" by the FDA.
 Cherries and walnuts, in other words, are dangerous. But
			
			statin drugs, antidepressants and 
			rat poison blood thinners are all backed and approved by the U.S. 
			Food and Drug Administration.
 
 
			  
			  
			Frito-Lay 
			snacks are 'heart healthy'
 
			Like almost everything else the FDA does, there's a double standard 
			in the enforcement of health claims.
 
			  
			Over at
			
			the Frito-Lay website, there are a 
			whole lot of ridiculous health claims being made about Frito-Lay 
			snack foods that the FDA doesn't seem too concerned about.
 Statements include the following, which are in reference to "how 
			much good stuff goes into your favorite snack":
 
				
				"Good stuff like potatoes, which 
				naturally contain vitamin C and essential minerals. Or corn, one 
				of the world's most popular grains, packed with Thiamin, vitamin 
				B6, and phosphorus - all necessary for healthy bones, teeth, 
				nerves and muscles." 
			Too bad all these ingredients are fried 
			at really high temperatures and can't be considered "healthy" by any 
			stretch of the imagination. The page goes on to claim that its 
			frying oils are filled with "good fats" that help to lower 
			cholesterol (seriously, I'm not making this up).
 Somehow
			
			Frito-Lay, a division of PepsiCo, 
			gets away with marketing its junk food snack products as healthy, 
			making all kinds of ludicrous claims about them, but walnut and 
			cherry growers are the target of FDA investigations about labeling 
			fraud.
 
 The message? Raw natural foods and non-processed fruits and nuts are 
			bad for you, but fried snack foods, dead foods and processed foods 
			are incredibly healthy. In opposition to all common sense, 
			this is the position the FDA now maintains.
 
 Things are seriously out of control.
 
 The Life Extension Foundation has also written about the 
			madness of this situation. Read "FDA 
			Says Walnuts are Illegal Drugs".
 
 
			  
			  
			The Free 
			Speech About Science Act
 
			There is some good news, though. My friends over at the Alliance 
			for Natural Health have come up with a solution to take back our 
			freedom to tell the truth about the health benefits of natural 
			products. It's called the Free Speech About Science Act, or
			
			HR 4913.
 
 You can read the entire legislative text of the bill at
			
			the following link. The bill is 
			only seven pages long, and you can read it fairly quickly if you 
			want to.
 
			  
			Here's a quick summary of its primary 
			objectives with some added commentary: 
				
					
					
					Food producers and 
					manufacturers, dietary supplement makers, and any others who 
					sell or market natural health products will no longer be 
					restricted from referencing and citing independent and 
					respected scientific research that highlights the health 
					benefits of natural products. (Current FDA guidelines are in 
					violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution, which 
					prohibits government restrictions on free speech, even those 
					that relate to natural health.)
					
					Referencing valid research will 
					no longer convert food and dietary supplements into 
					"unapproved drugs" in the eyes of the FDA.
					
					Only legitimate research may be 
					referenced, and guidelines for what is considered legitimate 
					include studies that are conducted in accordance with sound 
					scientific principles (because natural health is not in 
					opposition to science; science actually supports the healing 
					properties of foods and supplements).
					
					The FDA and FTC will still be 
					permitted to go after fraudulent claims, but they will no 
					longer be able to censor the truth about healing foods and 
					supplements. 
			  
			  
			  
			Help end FDA tyranny 
			against food and supplement companies 
			As it currently stands, most Americans are unable to make 
			responsible, informed lifestyle decisions about foods and 
			supplements because truthful information is restricted by agencies 
			like the FDA and FTC.
 
			  
			Mainstream society is flooded with drug 
			advertising making all sorts of false claims, but true claims about 
			natural products are routinely censored.
 It's time to put a stop to this FDA madness, and one way to go about 
			that is to support the Free Speech About Science Act. Every 
			American deserves access to the truth so that he or she can make 
			informed lifestyle choices, and you can help make that happen by 
			supporting this bill.
 
 The Alliance for Natural Health has created a convenient 
			legislative portal by which you can contact your Congressman and 
			urge support for the bill.
 
				
			 
			In the meantime, keep on buying (and 
			consuming) natural foods, medicinal herbs and truly natural 
			supplements, because that's where the real medicine in our world is 
			found. The FDA can try to censor the claims about healing foods, but 
			they cannot stop your body's own innate healing process from being 
			activated by those foods.
 Eating healing foods, in other words, helps your body heal whether 
			the FDA approves or not.
 
			    |