Mike: Hello everyone, this is 
				Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and I’m talking about the 
				mythical-disease known as 
				
				Attention Deficit Hyperactivity 
				Disorder, and the overmedication of the population, with Dr. 
				Fred Baughman. 
				
				 
				
				I want to give you a little background about why 
				I’m so interested in interviewing you. Our readers will really 
				appreciate your information, because we cover this subject quite 
				extensively. We have similar views on it and there is a lot of 
				increasing interest out there. 
				
				 
				
				People are realizing that they 
				have been fooled all these years, so that’s why I wanted to get 
				in touch with you.
				
				Dr. Fred Baughman: In the area of child psychiatric drugs, the 
				main focus has been the recently commenced FDA hearings, which 
				pertain to reports of death, strokes and heart attacks in 
				children and adults. The first report concerning 
				
				Adderall came 
				out about a year ago. Adderall is the number one ADHD drug, and 
				that report dealt with 12 or so individuals that were said to 
				have had strokes, if you can imagine a stroke occurring in a 
				young child. 
				
				 
				
				Some were sudden deaths and others were heart 
				complications, and a total of 20 to 30 such reports lead Health 
				Canada to take Adderall off the market.
 
				
				
				Mike: Now these records are through the voluntary 
				
				MedWatch 
				system, correct?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Exactly, which the FDA explains in a booklet about 
				the mechanics of MedWatch and other similar voluntary reporting 
				schemes. They confessed that such schemes ordinarily identify no 
				more than 1 percent of actual occurrences. So at any rate, we 
				had that occurrence about a year ago with Health Canada taking 
				Adderall off the market and our FDA not taking Adderall off the market. Subsequently, we learned our FDA lobbied Health Canada 
				behind-the-scenes not to take it off the market.
 
				
				
				Mike: That is unbelievable. 
				
				The FDA applied pressure to foreign 
				nations to protect dangerous drugs in our own market?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Yes, it’s just that. Then about three or four 
				months ago, Health Canada put Adderall back on the market. It 
				wasn’t because they had any good evidence of its safety or effectiveness. 
				Adderall is a mixture of the two salts of amphetamine, so it’s a 
				pure amphetamine.
 
				
				
				Mike: I want to talk to you more about what’s actually in these 
				drugs later.
				
				Dr. Baughman: The fascinating thing about Adderall is that it 
				was a weight reduction drug for adults called 
				
				Obetrol. It’s was 
				so extremely addictive that Obetrol was taken off the market for 
				that reason. Now we have the FDA bringing this extraordinarily 
				addictive drug to market for little children.
 
				
				
				Mike: So it was too dangerous for adults but not unsafe for 
				children?
				
				Dr. Baughman: In fact, they are bringing it to market for 
				entirely normal little children said to have the illusory, bogus 
				disease called ADHD.
 
				
				
				Mike: For those reading, you’re a pediatric neurologist, 
				correct?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Yes, and I practiced both adult and child 
				neurology; board-certified in both. I have been a long-standing 
				fellow of the American Academy of Neurology.
 
				
				
				Mike: Okay, so you come from the world of what I might call 
				conventional medicine. You are an M.D., and yet, over the years, 
				and I’m sure you’ll explain how this happened, you found some 
				mass distortions happening with 
				
				ADHD so you launched a web site 
				called 
				www.ADHDfraud.org. 
				
				 
				
				My first question: At what point as a 
				pediatric neurologist did you begin to see something was wrong 
				with this picture?
				
				Baughman: I began to publish actual research works when I was in 
				training, first at Sinai Hospital in New York and after that, at 
				the Boston Veteran Hospital. After the first 10 years in my 
				practice, which was in Grand Rapids, Michigan, I published a 
				considerable body of original research mainly having to do with 
				genetically determined brain decisions or neurological diseases 
				and chromosome abnormalities. 
				
				 
				
				Much of that work was published 
				with Dr. Joseph Mann, also of Grand Rapids. I have discovered 
				and described actual diseases, and that’s the background that I 
				bring to my newfound duty of evaluating and critiquing 
				modern-day psychiatry, especially where it pertains to their 
				wholly fraudulent claims that their diagnoses, such as ADHD, 
				bipolar OCD and depression are actual brain diseases when they 
				are not.
				
				Now I was in private practice from 1964 to 1993 when I retired, 
				and it was during the ‘70s that I began to notice, first in 
				Grand Rapids and then here in San Diego where I relocated, the 
				increasing frequency of the burst of diagnoses of hyperactivity 
				and brain damage. Then in 1980, the American Psychiatric 
				Association invented ADD, or attention deficit disorder, and with 
				that the epidemic seemed to worsen. 
				
				 
				
				It appeared to me that the 
				frequency of such diagnoses and their treatment with Ritalin, an 
				amphetamine-like drug every bit as addictive as cocaine, were 
				increasing in my community. 
				
				 
				
				At first I took note and later 
				became alarmed at the frequency with which children were being 
				referred to me by schools through their physician with these 
				diagnostic labels put in place, basically by schoolteachers.
 
				
				
				Mike: This was a “disease” that almost appeared to be spreading 
				like a virus.
				
				Dr. Baughman: It was a notion of a disease, an illusory disease; 
				with child psychiatry repeating the lie often enough that it was 
				becoming a reality, especially for the educational establishment 
				and teachers nationwide, and increasingly, the media or the public 
				at large. 
				
				 
				
				Then in 1997 with the epidemic standing somewhere 
				around 500,000 to 700,000 nationwide, they simply rewrote the 
				diagnostic criteria by adding hyperactivity to the attention 
				deficit.
 
				
				
				Mike: Do you mean to say that there is a group of psychiatrists 
				who meet in a room somewhere and they just write down and invent 
				whatever behavioral observations they want to assign to 
				this disease definition?
				
				Dr. Baughman: That is exactly the way it works. In medicine, 
				including my specialty, neurology, if a curious, observant 
				physician discovers a new abnormality in a patient in his 
				practice or in his clinic at medical schools, that previously 
				unobserved abnormality is the new disease. So there has to be an 
				objective abnormality. In diabetes, there is elevated blood 
				sugar in the blood throughout all the tissues. 
				
				 
				
				With cancer, a 
				pathologist has to see cells that have abnormal nuclei and 
				chromosomes under the microscope in order to contend that that 
				patient has that disease or a disease. But in psychiatry, the 
				committee of the diagnostic and statistical manual meets in a 
				room and by a show of hands, they consider one another’s 
				favorite galaxies or mixture of behaviors and vote those into 
				existence and give it a code number or an entry into the DSM, 
				and they are all psychiatric disorders. 
				
				 
				
				By the word “disorder,” they 
				mean disease.
 
				
				
				Mike: Can you give us an example of the type of behaviors that 
				are listed in the DSM as being diseases or disorders?
				
				Dr. Baughman: In the case of attention deficit hyperactivity 
				disorder, here are the 14 symptoms that appeared in the 1987 
				DSM. Remember, a child found to have eight of them was deemed to 
				have ADHD. 
				
					
						- 
						
						number one is often fidgets or squirms 
- 
						
						two is 
				trouble staying in one’s seat 
- 
						
						three is easily distracted 
- 
						
						four 
				is can’t wait one’s turn 
- 
						
						five is blurts out answers 
- 
						
						six is 
				trouble following instructions 
- 
						
						seven is can’t sustain 
				attention 
- 
						
						eight is shifts from one activity to another 
- 
						
						nine 
				doesn’t play quietly 
- 
						
						ten talks excessively 
- 
						
						eleven interrupts 
- 
						
						twelve 
				can’t listen 
- 
						
						thirteen loses things 
- 
						
						fourteen does dangerous things, thrill 
				seeking and so on 
				
				
				Mike: Wow, I think you just described probably half the 
				population.
				
				Dr. Baughman: Right, exactly, so much for their motivation. It’s 
				just absolutely brilliant, the marketing scheme, as long as you 
				get away with it.
 
				
				
				Mike: And they are getting away with it.
				
				Dr. Baughman: The Center for Disease Control estimated in 2004 
				that there were 4 million cases nationwide in children 17 and 
				under.
 
				
				
				Mike: Now isn’t it one out of every 10 children in public 
				schools?
				
				Dr. Baughman: As of 2003 I believe it was. Professor William 
				Cary of the University of Pennsylvania testified to Congress 
				that 17 percent of all school children as of 2003 are on some 
				type of psychiatric drug, not all ADHD drugs and not all with an 
				ADHD diagnosis. I think that the number today is probably one in 
				five, or 20 percent. It was 17 percent according to Dr. Cary in 
				2003. It’s probably 20 percent today.
 
				
				
				Mike: It’s astounding. Even if this disease were legitimate, 
				this was something that doesn’t exist in other countries and it 
				didn’t exist anywhere two generations ago. How do the 
				psychiatrics explain the abrupt emergence of this apparent 
				disease?
				
				Dr. Baughman: They don’t much explain it. People who try to ask 
				legitimate questions of them are generally ignored because they 
				don’t have any scientific answers. They know it is a big lie, and 
				as long as they are getting away with it and as long as they 
				have full access to the U.S. Department of Education and the 
				lobbyists to members of Congress, they enact the diagnosis and 
				treatment of this into law. 
				
				 
				
				Consequently, there are laws on the 
				books that mandate a certain level of diagnosis in the schools 
				and that even pay extra to school districts for every child that 
				is diagnosed with one of their bogus and contrived diseases and 
				treated as special-education subjects. Taxpayers end up paying 
				two or three times as much for children thus labeled as they do 
				for normal kids.
 
				
				
				Mike: Let me clarify that. So a school district that gets more 
				of its children are diagnosed with ADHD, it gets rewarded with 
				more funds?
				
				Dr. Baughman: They get more funds. There are even laws on the 
				books that pay parents a stipend for every child they have who 
				is diagnosed and thus considered disabled. So I think they get 
				Social Security disability. I think the stipend, at least a few 
				years ago, was $400 a month.
 
				
				
				Mike: Isn’t this a situation where everybody is on the take, so 
				they can turn the bodies of our children into profit machines?
				
				Dr. Baughman: That’s exactly what is happening. These entirely 
				bogus, junk science, pseudoscientific labels are a barcode on 
				the forehead of a child, and once the label gets in their 
				record, it sticks. 
				
				 
				
				They can’t get rid of it. If a child or an 
				adult gets one of these labels, this stigmatizes that 
				individual. They are going to have more trouble getting health 
				care insurance and trouble finding employment. The armed 
				services will not take children who have been on these drugs. 
				
				 
				
				I 
				must confess that as the Armed Forces have failed to meet their 
				quota for the Iraq war, they have dropped their standards and 
				they are recently accepting persons who have such labels and 
				have been on such drugs.
 
				
				
				Mike: Well, let’s get back to the parents if we could for a 
				minute. People in positions of authority, people who apparently 
				have an education in neurology or psychiatry, are telling 
				parents that their children have a chemical brain disorder. It’s 
				a very convincing argument to the parents.
				
				Dr. Baughman: Yes it is, and I must point out that virtually 
				every physician-patient encounter in the country, regardless of 
				specialty, has wholeheartedly embraced this scheme. That includes 
				the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Child Neurology Society, 
				of which I am a member, the American Academy of Family Practice, 
				and by various psychological groups. 
				
				 
				
				The American Academy of 
				Pediatrics in fact, republished in the DSM for diagnostic 
				criteria for ADHD in the journal Pediatrics, I think it was in 
				1999, and subsequently published a guideline for the 
				psycho-stimulant treatment of ADHD the following year, I believe 
				in 2000. In so doing, the American Academy of Pediatrics, along 
				with the other groups I just mentioned, served notice that they 
				intended to enter the business of diagnosing and drugging 
				entirely normal children for profit. 
				
				 
				
				That’s one of the things 
				that has spurred the epidemic.
 
				
				
				Mike: Now, do you have any colleagues who are also standing up 
				and openly questioning this practice, or are you pretty much 
				finding yourself isolated?
				
				Dr. Baughman: I’ve been isolated, but there are a small cadre of 
				honest scientific physicians who feel as I do, and a smaller 
				number yet, that are speaking out. I’ve really been surprised to 
				behold the impact that my web site has had. Now I’ve got a book 
				that is going to be published soon.
 
				
				
				Mike: Can you give us the title of that book please?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Yes, it’s called “The ADHD Fraud: How Psychiatry 
				Makes Patients of Normal Children.” It will be available through
				
				www.Trafford.com  - Trafford publishing company 
				- and it should be 
				available within the week.
 
				
				
				Mike: Have you been pressured to censor your views in any way or 
				have you taken any heat?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Back in 1994-95, I made a formal written proposal 
				to the American Academy of Neurology to write practice parameter 
				for ADHD that would essentially determine the best advisable 
				practices for the disease. The Academy wrote an encouraging 
				response and gave me the go ahead in writing. 
				
				 
				
				I presented them 
				with a statement saying that my review of the world scientific 
				literature found no evidence that ADHD was a disease. The next 
				thing that happened was that I heard from members of the Quality 
				Assurance Committee that my efforts wouldn’t really be needed any 
				longer. So I was essentially deep-sixed; I was put on the shelf.
 
				
				
				Mike: Do you know which of these groups accept money from 
				pharmaceutical companies?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Every one of them. Every one of them accepts lots 
				of money and there is no such thing as a psychiatric expert in 
				any psychiatric disorder that is not wholly owned or operated by 
				the pharmaceutical industry.
 
				
				
				Mike: That’s a big statement.
				
				Dr. Baughman: That is a big statement and a big and tragic 
				truth.
 
				
				
				Mike: So these experts are really just paid promoters of the 
				drugs.
				
				Dr. Baughman: They’ve got M.D. degrees and so they masquerade as 
				scientific physicians but they have sold their souls and they 
				have sold whatever scientific credentials they ever had.
 
				
				
				Mike: What kind of money can they make writing these 
				prescriptions for children?
				
				Dr. Baughman: They are making an immense amount of money; 
				millions of dollars.
 
				
				
				Mike: This is all very difficult for the average American parent 
				or consumer to swallow. They simply cannot believe that 
				individuals would be so evil as to sell their souls to 
				pharmaceutical companies.
				
				Dr. Baughman: I think this has a great deal to do with 
				the magnitude of the psychiatric epidemic in general and the 
				ADHD epidemic. Parents, ordinary layman, going with their 
				children at the behest of school officials in the first place, could not 
				believe that someone would tell a total lie to them. They cannot 
				imagine that. 
				
				 
				
				At the moment, I’m working with individuals to put 
				together a consumer fraud suit here in the state of California, 
				based on fraudulent diagnosis of ADHD and subsequent drugging. If 
				you’ve been lied to and told you have a disease when you don’t 
				and then drugged, that’s battery.
 
				
				
				Mike: Will you keep me posted on this action?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Yes, people keep asking about it. I tell them to 
				keep an eye on my web site because if we get this thing going, I 
				certainly will be posting notes as to our progress or lack of 
				it.
 
				
				
				Mike: If you set a precedent in California, this thing could 
				really sweep the nation.
				
				Dr. Baughman: That is what we hope. They’ve had such obscene 
				amounts of drug company money to defend themselves, that no one 
				has really succeeded against them as is necessary to put an end 
				to this fraud. It’s so much more than a fraud when they actually 
				poison normal children, which is what they’re doing.
 
				
				
				Mike: I’ve heard it described somewhere else on the internet as 
				a chemical holocaust or crimes against humanity.
				
				Dr. Baughman: There has been a perversion of the language. They 
				have taken entirely normal children and made patients out of 
				them by diagnosing them with fictional chemical imbalances of 
				the brain. It’s a total fraud. 
				
				 
				
				I have observed two national news 
				programs recently, talking about a new kind of disability that 
				our soldiers in the Iraqi conflict are developing. I listened to 
				hear what the new disease was. Lo and behold, it was PTSD, 
				post-traumatic stress disorder.
				
				I grant you, there are a lot of troubling visions and 
				experiences that all men in a war are exposed to, and these cause 
				troubling flash-backs and troubled sleep. But it’s not an organic 
				disease of the brain as psychiatry would have us believe, nor 
				are these symptoms inevitable. They would have all the soldiers 
				over there believe that PTSD is a disease with a grave 
				prognosis. 
				
				 
				
				They tell them they are never going to get rid of 
				these terrible flash-backs without the help of a new drug that 
				they’re trying to develop to obliterate those painful memories.
 
				
				
				Mike: Well, that’s the way to make a permanent customer, isn’t 
				it?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Yes, and the media has bought into this 
				psychiatric disease mongering, and that’s why it is rampant. 
				That’s why the drugging of our children is rampant.
 
				
				
				Mike: Isn’t the next great marketing frontier for these 
				companies adult ADHD now?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Well yes, it’s not the future; it’s the 
				present. There has been a tremendous year-to-year growth in the 
				billions of prescriptions for  
				
				Adderall, 
				
				Ritalin,
				
				Concerta, and 
				all the other amphetamines. My alma mater, New York University 
				School of Medicine, is at the very forefront of this fraud. 
				
				
				 
				
				There was a story in the magazine section of the New York Times 
				roughly a year ago, describing the launch of an adult ADHD 
				clinic at the university. They had a hall or a big space at the Helmsley Hotel. I guess they had signs out on the curb saying 
				this was underway on the top floor. If you want to be checked for 
				ADHD, go on up.
 
				
				
				Mike: They had a recruiting service there.
				
				Dr. Baughman: People went up and they took this behavioral 
				checklist test and 85 percent of those taking the test had the 
				disease. They got labeled and were on their way the very next 
				day to their doctors with a new label.
 
				
				
				Mike: Is it true that I could make an appointment with a 
				psychiatrist walk in and say I have trouble focusing, I’m easily 
				distracted and I fidget a lot, and right then I could be 
				diagnosed and put on these drugs?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Let me tell you something. In a 2002 survey done 
				by the American Academy Of Child and Adult Psychiatry, they 
				looked at the surveying practices of child psychiatrists and 
				found that 91 percent of children seeing child psychiatrists 
				came out of their initial visit with a prescription for a drug.
 
				
				
				Mike: Ninety-one percent?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Ninety-one percent. I would say that a third to a 
				half of all the patients I saw as a neurologist had no organic 
				disease. Now contrast that with this 2002 study survey of child 
				psychiatry, where 91 percent are coming away with a prescription. 
				Were the 90 percent commonsense parents? Most likely.
 
				
				
				Mike: If you look at the big picture of what’s happening here, 
				what does this say about scientific integrity in Western 
				civilization, if these well-educated people in this so-called 
				scientific organization can invent such a widespread hoax? Does 
				this have you questioning some of scientific truth today, or 
				what’s your view on it?
				
				Dr. Baughman: I pointed out earlier that it’s not just 
				psychiatry, but its pediatrics, neurologists, family 
				practitioners, psychologists, and school teachers across the 
				country that have become pawns and are not seeing the evil of 
				their ways by becoming pushers for the drugging establishment. 
				This is the standard of practice across the board. 
				
				 
				
				The entire 
				profession has been bought out. On average, every physician in 
				the country gets $13,000 per year from the drug companies.
 
				
				
				Mike: In what form?
				
				Dr. Baughman: They get free dinners, golf, free trips, but that 
				money isn’t spread around equally. Itis spread strategically so 
				that your top policy makers in medicine - your top psychiatrists 
				and your heads of departments - get more money than anyone else. 
				Some get about $500,000 a year, and it has been so successful 
				that no one within academic medicine can speak out as I speak 
				out. I knew along time ago I would not prove compatible with the 
				sort of control from above that is the rule in academic medicine.
 
				
				
				Mike: So you are saying that anybody in academic medicine has to 
				go along to get along.
				
				Dr. Baughman: If they were to stand up and say things that I 
				say, they would be out the next day. NYU has become a hive for 
				disease-inventing psychiatry. I got the sad news that the 
				department received more funds to train more poisoners of normal 
				children.
 
				
				
				Mike: Well, I think it’s obvious that you have experienced the 
				idea that when you operate with integrity in this world, it can 
				be a pretty lonely path. Now let’s talk about poisoning and the 
				long-term implications. What happens to Americans when one out 
				of five children grow up on speed or some other kind of 
				psychiatric drug?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Well, we are at that number clearly. We are 
				drugging well over 10 million. There is no sign that it’s 
				getting better. I pointed out that ADHD in adults is a rapidly 
				growing market sector, so I think when you are told you’ve got a 
				disease and you are in fact normal, you are damaged just by the 
				label. 
				
				 
				
				When you are given a drug to normalize an abnormality in 
				your body or brain that doesn’t exist, that’s poisoning and you 
				are going to be damaged by that drug every single time. So the 
				side effect rate for Ritalin or for Adderall is 100 percent. 
				There is no kid that gets put on these drugs that isn’t altered 
				by them. Their perceptions, behaviors, feelings and emotions are 
				always changed and not always noticeably. 
				
				 
				
				They are always 
				altered and there are horrible long-term consequences that we 
				can’t begin to know.
 
				
				
				Mike: What long-term side effects have you heard of?
				
				Dr. Baughman: I mentioned before that Health Canada found that 
				there were roughly 20 to 30 cases of strokes in young children, 
				roughly 10 or 12 sudden deaths, heart abnormalities. Just before 
				the Feb. 9 FDA hearing, there were 51 reported cases of 
				complications, deaths, strokes and heart attacks reported to the 
				FDA MedWatch program. I have written testimony on the record for 
				the Feb. 9 FDA conference.
				
				In fact, back in the 1990s, I testified in a Kansas City case 
				for Mr. Gary Bell on behalf of his daughter Stephanie. She 
				underwent heart surgery for what I think was a complication of 
				her long-term Ritalin use. At any rate, Gary Bell and I did a 
				freedom of information request for all the deaths and injuries 
				related to Ritalin or methylphenidate, and for 1990-1997 there 
				were 160 deaths from methylphenidate Ritalin. 
				
				 
				
				There were another 
				26 deaths for 1998 to 2000, 186 deaths for the decade.
 
				
				
				Mike: Again, these are only voluntary reports.
				
				Dr. Baughman: These are voluntary reporting schemes to MedWatch, 
				1 percent of actual incidents the FDA says. That means there may 
				have been 18,600 for that decade. I have personally been 
				consulted in about a dozen death cases, including Matthew Smith 
				of Royal Oak, Michigan, which is just outside of Detroit. He and 
				his parents had been coerced to keep him on Ritalin from first 
				grade to age 13.
				
				 
				
				He suddenly fell over while playing with friends 
				and died. At autopsy, his heart muscle was diffusely enlarged, 
				scarred and infiltrated with fat. The medical examiner, Dr. Drakovic, a highly experienced pathologist, said there was no 
				doubt in his mind that Matthew Smith died of long-term chronic 
				amphetamine methylphenidate Ritalin poisoning.
 
				
				
				Mike: So we have a population that is potentially setting 
				themselves up for long-term death and harm just like drug 
				addicts?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Yes. Reports that young athletes, college and high 
				school athletes suddenly drop dead are not uncommon. There was a 
				pro ballplayer, I think a pitcher on the Baltimore Orioles, who 
				had been on supplements that contained ephedrine, which is very 
				similar to the amphetamines. 
				
				 
				
				My feeling is that steroid use and 
				amphetamine use is very, very common in athletes at the high 
				school level and up. I think every one of those deaths is 
				conceivably related to psychiatric drugs, most of which have 
				startling coronary cardiac heart consequences. Not just 
				amphetamines, but all of these so-called anti-psychotics, which 
				are horrible poisons the pharmaceutical industry is hoisting 
				upon the population. 
				
				 
				
				Almost all those drugs have cardiac side 
				effects 
				as well.
 
				
				
				Mike: Before I wrap this up. I have to ask about the front 
				groups for psychiatric medicine, like 
				
				TeenScreen and 
				
				CHAD. Give 
				us a rundown on these groups and what they do.
				
				Dr. Baughman: Teen Screen is coming to us out of Columbia 
				University, once an esteemed medical school uptown from NYU, 
				which was also once a proud scientific institute. 
				
				 
				
				David 
				Schaefer, the psychiatrist who has authored Teen Screen, along 
				with the pharmaceutical sponsors, is not content with the rate 
				of growth of psychiatric poisoning in this country, so they want 
				to make it mandatory that all kids in our captive population, 
				our schools to take diagnostic tests.
 
				
				
				Mike: So they think four out of every 10 kids…
				
				Dr. Baughman: That is probably a low yield for Teen Screen. I 
				would think that more of these screens would have a 60, 70 or 
				even 80 percent positive diagnostic rate like the adult ADHD 
				screen run by New York University at one of the Helmsley Hotels. 
				As long as they’ve got enough friends in Congress and in the 
				White House to write these things into law, they’re going to 
				carry on. 
				
				 
				
				Teen Screen is very much a product of the White House. 
				The President’s new Freedom Commission on Mental Health launched 
				the notion of Teen Screen.
 
				
				
				Mike: Which is mandatory mental health screening, right?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Yes. I think Illinois already passed it and made 
				it law. They are not asking parents whether or not they want 
				their kids screened. This is Big Brother to the max. This is 
				worse than anything Stalin could have imagined. This population 
				had better wake up; the implications go far beyond the drugging 
				of our normal school children.
 
				
				
				Mike: That leads me to my final question: 
				
					
						- 
						
						How does all of this 
				ever end?  
- 
						
						How does this return to normal? 
						 
- 
						
						When is the fraud 
				exposed?  
- 
						
						How long will it take? 
						 
- 
						
						If the pharmaceutical companies 
				are so powerful and control so many big players, how does this 
				ever get exposed? 
				
				
				Dr. Baughman: Exactly. Right now there is a pharmaceutical 
				company lobbyist for every member of Congress and probably three 
				or four for every senator. Who knows how many for the president? 
				It is really a horror story unfolding. When I started medicine 
				in 1964, I thought we were a wonderful profession. We didn’t 
				have to compromise ourselves by inventing things to do. That has 
				changed 100 percent. The medical profession is a disgrace today.
 
				
				
				Mike: Again for those reading, you are hearing from Dr. Fred 
				Baughman, pediatric neurologist and M.D. Your web site is 
				
				www.ADHDfraud.org. What is the title of your upcoming book?
				
				Dr. Baughman: “The ADHD Fraud: How Psychiatry 
				Makes Patients of Normal Children.”
 
				
				
				Mike: Okay, that’s a title that we will be looking forward to. 
				Any last thoughts, Dr. Baughman?
				
				Dr. Baughman: Yes, you might also consider getting a DVD 
				production by Gary Null Associates in New York City, called 
				“Drugging Our Children.” I was interviewed for it in a powerful 
				hard-hitting video view of what we’ve talked about here. I also 
				have a video that I produced with footage from the 1998 ADHD 
				consensus conference. My video is called “ADHD Total 100% 
				Fraud.” It can be purchased through my web site.
 
				
				
				Mike: If you have any new items, books, videos or press 
				releases, send them my way. I will be happy to get that out to 
				the readers.
				
				Dr. Baughman: I sure will.