DNA
				
				
				
				The Tiny Code That's 
				Toppling Evolution
				
				by Mario Seiglie
				
				from
				
				GNMagazine Website
				
					
					As scientists explore a new 
					universe—the universe inside the cell—
					
					they are making startling 
					discoveries of information systems 
					
					more complex than anything ever 
					devised by humanity's best minds. 
					
					How did they get there, and what 
					does it mean for the theory of evolution?
				
				
				Two great achievements occurred in 
				1953, more than half a century ago.
				
				The first was the successful ascent of Mt. Everest, the highest 
				mountain in the world. Sir Edmund Hillary and his guide,
				Tenzing Norgay, reached the summit that year, an 
				accomplishment that's still considered the ultimate feat for 
				mountain climbers. Since then, more than a thousand mountaineers 
				have made it to the top, and each year hundreds more attempt it.
				
				Yet the second great achievement of 1953 has had a greater 
				impact on the world. Each year, many thousands join the ranks of 
				those participating in this accomplishment, hoping to ascend to 
				fame and fortune.
				
				It was in 1953 that James Watson and Francis Crick 
				achieved what appeared impossible—discovering the genetic 
				structure deep inside the nucleus of our cells. We call this 
				genetic material DNA, an abbreviation for deoxyribonucleic acid.
				
				The discovery of the double-helix structure of the DNA molecule 
				opened the floodgates for scientists to examine the code 
				embedded within it. Now, more than half a century after the 
				initial discovery, the DNA code has been deciphered—although 
				many of its elements are still not well understood.
				
				What has been found has profound implications regarding
				
				Darwinian evolution, the 
				theory taught in schools all over the world that all living 
				beings have evolved by natural processes through mutation and 
				natural selection.
 
				
				
				Amazing revelations about DNA
				As scientists began to 
				decode the human DNA molecule, they found something quite 
				unexpected—an exquisite 'language' composed of some 3 billion 
				genetic letters. 
				
					
					"One of the most extraordinary 
					discoveries of the twentieth century," says Dr. Stephen 
					Meyer, director of the Center for Science and Culture at 
					the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., "was that DNA 
					actually stores information—the detailed instructions for 
					assembling proteins—in the form of a four-character digital 
					code" 
					
					(quoted by Lee Strobel, The 
					Case for a Creator, 2004, p. 224).
				
				
				It is hard to fathom, but the amount 
				of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 12 sets 
				of The Encyclopaedia Britannica—an incredible 384 volumes" 
				worth of detailed information that would fill 48 feet of library 
				shelves!
				
				Yet in their actual size—which is only two millionths of a 
				millimeter thick—a teaspoon of DNA, according to molecular 
				biologist Michael Denton, could contain all the 
				information needed to build the proteins for all the species of 
				organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and,
				
					
					"there would still be enough 
					room left for all the information in every book ever 
					written" 
					
					(Evolution: A Theory in 
					Crisis, 1996, p. 334).
				
				
				Who or what could miniaturize such 
				information and place this enormous number of 'letters' in their 
				proper sequence as a genetic instruction manual? 
				 
				
				Could evolution have gradually come 
				up with a system like this?
 
				
				
				DNA contains a genetic language
				Let's first consider some 
				of the characteristics of this genetic 'language.' For it to be 
				rightly called a language, it must contain the following 
				elements: an alphabet or coding system, correct spelling, 
				grammar (a proper arrangement of the words), meaning (semantics) 
				and an intended purpose.
				
				Scientists have found the genetic code has all of these key 
				elements. 
				
					
					"The coding regions of DNA," 
					explains Dr. Stephen Meyer, "have exactly the same relevant 
					properties as a computer code or language" 
					
					(quoted by Strobel, p. 237, 
					emphasis in original).
				
				
				The only other codes found to be 
				true languages are all of human origin. Although we do find that 
				"dogs bark when they perceive danger, bees dance to point other 
				bees to a source and whales emit sounds, to name a few examples 
				of other species" communication, none of these have the 
				composition of a language. They are only considered low-level 
				communication signals.
				
				The only types of communication considered high-level are human 
				languages, artificial languages such as computer and Morse codes 
				and the genetic code. No other communication system has been 
				found to contain the basic characteristics of a language.
				
				Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, commented that,
				
				
					
					"DNA is like a software program, 
					only much more complex than anything we've ever devised."
				
				
				Can you imagine something more 
				intricate than the most complex program running on a 
				supercomputer being devised by accident through 
				evolution—no matter how much time, how many mutations and how 
				much natural selection are taken into account?
 
				
				
				DNA language not the same as DNA 
				molecule
				Recent studies in 
				information theory have come up with some astounding 
				conclusions—namely, that information cannot be considered in the 
				same category as matter and energy. It's true that matter or 
				energy can carry information, but they are not the same as 
				information itself.
				
				For instance, a book such as Homer's Iliad contains information, 
				but is the physical book itself information? No, the materials 
				of the book—the paper, ink and glue contain the contents, but 
				they are only a means of transporting it.
				
				If the information in the book was spoken aloud, written in 
				chalk or electronically reproduced in a computer, the 
				information does not suffer qualitatively from the means of 
				transporting it. 
				
					
					"In fact the content of the 
					message," says professor Phillip Johnson, "is independent of 
					the physical makeup of the medium" 
					
					(Defeating Darwinism by 
					Opening Minds, 1997, p. 71).
				
				
				The same principle is found in the 
				genetic code. The DNA molecule carries the genetic language, but 
				the language itself is independent of its carrier. The same 
				genetic information can be written in a book, stored in a 
				compact disk or sent over the Internet, and yet the quality or 
				content of the message has not changed by changing the means of 
				conveying it.
				
				As George Williams puts it: 
				
					
					"The gene is a package of 
					information, not an object. The pattern of base 
					pairs in a DNA molecule specifies the gene. But the DNA 
					molecule is the medium, it's not the message" 
					
					(quoted by Johnson, p. 70).
				
				
				
				Information from an intelligent 
				source
				In addition, this type of 
				high-level information has been found to originate only from an
				intelligent source.
				
				As Lee Strobel explains: 
				
					
					"The data at the core of life is 
					not disorganized, it's not simply orderly like salt 
					crystals, but it's complex and specific information that can 
					accomplish a bewildering task—the building of biological 
					machines that far outstrip human technological capabilities"
					
					
					(p. 244).
				
				
				For instance, the precision of this 
				genetic language is such that the average mistake that is not 
				caught turns out to be one error per 10 billion letters. If a 
				mistake occurs in one of the most significant parts of the code, 
				which is in the genes, it can cause a disease such as 
				sickle-cell anemia. Yet even the best and most intelligent 
				typist in the world couldn't come close to making only one 
				mistake per 10 billion letters—far from it.
				
				So to believe that the genetic code gradually evolved in 
				Darwinian style would break all the known rules of how 
				matter, energy and the laws of nature work. In fact, 
				there has not been found in nature any example of one 
				information system inside the cell gradually evolving into 
				another functional information program.
				
				Michael Behe, a biochemist and professor at 
				Pennsylvania's Lehigh University, explains that genetic 
				information is primarily an instruction manual and gives some 
				examples.
				
				He writes: 
				
					
					"Consider a step-by-step list of 
					[genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in one of the 
					lines of instructions. So instead of saying, "Take a 
					1/4-inch nut," a mutation might say, "Take a 3/8-inch nut."
					
					 
					
					Or instead of "Place the round 
					peg in the round hole," we might get "Place the round peg in 
					the square hole"... What a mutation cannot do is change all 
					the instructions in one step—say, [providing instructions] 
					to build a fax machine instead of a radio" 
					
					(Darwin's Black Box, 1996, p. 
					41).
				
				
				We therefore have in the genetic 
				code an immensely complex instruction manual that has been 
				majestically designed by a more intelligent source than human 
				beings.
				
				Even one of the discoverers of the genetic code, the agnostic 
				and recently deceased Francis Crick, after decades of 
				work on deciphering it, admitted that, 
				
					
					"an honest man, armed with all 
					the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in 
					some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be 
					almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would 
					have had to have been satisfied to get it going" 
					
					(Life Itself, 1981, p. 88, 
					emphasis added).
				
				
				
				Evolution fails to provide answers
				It is good to remember 
				that, in spite of all the efforts of all the scientific 
				laboratories around the world working over many decades, they 
				have not been able to produce so much as a single human hair.
				
				 
				
				How much more difficult is it to 
				produce an entire body consisting of some 100 trillion cells!
				
				Up to now, 
				Darwinian evolutionists could 
				try to counter their detractors with some possible explanations 
				for the complexity of life. But now they have to face the 
				information dilemma: How can meaningful, precise information be 
				created by accident—by mutation and natural selection? None of 
				these contain the mechanism of intelligence, a requirement for 
				creating complex information such as that found in the genetic 
				code.
				
				Darwinian evolution is still taught in most schools as though 
				it were fact. 
				 
				
				But it is increasingly being found 
				wanting by a growing number of scientists. 
				
					
					"As recently as twenty-five 
					years ago," says former atheist Patrick Glynn, "a reasonable 
					person weighing the purely scientific evidence on the issue 
					would likely have come down on the side of skepticism 
					[regarding a Creator]. That is no longer the case." 
					
					 
					
					He adds: "Today the concrete 
					data point strongly in the direction of the God 
					hypothesis. It is the simplest and most obvious solution..."
					
					
					(God: The Evidence, 1997, pp. 
					54-55, 53)
				
				
				
				Quality of genetic information the 
				same
				Evolution tells us that 
				through chance mutations and natural selection, living things 
				evolve. Yet to evolve means to gradually change certain aspects 
				of some living thing until it becomes another type of creature, 
				and this can only be done by changing the genetic information.
				
				So what do we find about the genetic code? 
				 
				
				The same basic quality of 
				information exists in a humble bacteria or a plant as in a 
				person. A bacterium has a shorter genetic code, but 
				qualitatively it gives instructions as precisely and exquisitely 
				as that of a human being. We find the same prerequisites of a 
				language—alphabet, grammar and semantics—in simple bacteria and 
				algae as in man.
				
				Each cell with genetic information, from bacteria to man, 
				according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, consists 
				of, 
				
					
					"artificial languages and their 
					decoding systems, memory banks for information storage and 
					retrieval, elegant control systems regulating the automated 
					assembly of parts and components, error fail-safe and 
					proof-reading devices utilized for quality control, assembly 
					processes involving the principle of prefabrication and 
					modular construction... [and a] capacity not equaled in any 
					of our most advanced machines, for it would be capable of 
					replicating its entire structure within a matter of a few 
					hours." 
					
					(Denton, p. 329)
				
				
				So how could the genetic information 
				of bacteria gradually evolve into information for another type 
				of being, when only one or a few minor mistakes in the millions 
				of letters in that bacterium's DNA can kill it?
				
				Again, evolutionists are uncharacteristically silent on 
				the subject. They don't even have a working hypothesis about it.
				
				 
				
				Lee Strobel writes: 
				
				
					
					"The six feet of DNA coiled 
					inside every one of our body's one hundred trillion cells 
					contains a four-letter chemical alphabet that spells out 
					precise assembly instructions for all the proteins from 
					which our bodies are made... No hypothesis has come close to 
					explaining how information got into biological matter by 
					naturalistic means." 
					
					(Strobel, p. 282)
				
				
				Werner Gitt, professor of 
				information systems, puts it succinctly: 
				
					
					"The basic flaw of all 
					evolutionary views is the origin of the information in 
					living beings. It has never been shown that a coding system 
					and semantic information could originate by itself [through 
					matter]... The information theorems predict that this will 
					never be possible. A purely material origin of life is thus 
					[ruled out]." 
					
					(Gitt, p. 124)
				
				
				
				The clincher
				Besides all the evidence 
				we have covered for the intelligent design of DNA information, 
				there is still one amazing fact remaining—the ideal number of 
				genetic letters in the DNA code for storage and translation.
				
				Moreover, the copying mechanism of DNA, to meet maximum 
				effectiveness, requires the number of letters in each word to be 
				an even number. Of all possible mathematical combinations, the 
				ideal number for storage and transcription has been calculated 
				to be four letters.
				
				This is exactly what has been found in the genes of every living 
				thing on earth—a four-letter digital code. 
				 
				
				As Werner Gitt states: 
				
				
					
					"The coding system used for 
					living beings is optimal from an engineering standpoint. 
					This fact strengthens the argument that it was a case of 
					purposeful design rather that a [lucky] chance" 
					
					(Gitt, p. 95)
				
				
				
				More witnesses
				Back in Darwin's day, 
				when his book On the Origin of Species was published in 
				1859, life appeared much simpler. Viewed through the primitive 
				microscopes of the day, the cell appeared to be but a simple 
				blob of jelly or uncomplicated protoplasm. 
				 
				
				Now, almost 150 years later, that 
				view has changed dramatically as science has discovered a 
				virtual universe inside the cell.
				
					
					"It was once expected," writes 
					Professor Behe, "that the basis of life would be exceedingly 
					simple. That expectation has been smashed. Vision, motion, 
					and other biological functions have proven to be no less 
					sophisticated than television cameras and automobiles.
					
					 
					
					Science has made enormous 
					progress in understanding how the chemistry of life works, 
					but the elegance and complexity of biological systems at the 
					molecular level have paralyzed science's attempt to explain 
					their origins." 
					
					(Behe, p. x)
				
				
				Dr. Meyer considers the recent 
				discoveries about DNA as the Achilles" heel of evolutionary 
				theory. 
				 
				
				He observes: 
				
					
					"Evolutionists are still trying 
					to apply Darwin's nineteenth-century thinking to a 
					twenty-first century reality, and it's not working... I 
					think the information revolution taking place in biology is 
					sounding the death knell for Darwinism and chemical 
					evolutionary theories" 
					
					(quoted by Strobel, p. 243).
				
				
				Dr. Meyer's conclusion? 
				
					
					"I believe that the testimony of 
					science supports theism. While there will always be points 
					of tension or unresolved conflict, the major developments in 
					science in the past five decades have been running in a 
					strongly theistic direction." 
					
					(ibid., p. 77)
				
				
				Dean Kenyon, a biology 
				professor who repudiated his earlier book on Darwinian 
				evolution—mostly due to the discoveries of the information found 
				in DNA—states: 
				
					
					"This new realm of molecular 
					genetics (is) where we see the most compelling evidence of 
					design on the Earth." 
					
					(ibid., p. 221)
				
				
				Just recently, one of the world's 
				most famous atheists, Professor Antony Flew, admitted he 
				couldn't explain how DNA was created and developed through 
				evolution. 
				 
				
				He now accepts the need for an 
				intelligent source to have been involved in the making of 
				the DNA code.
				
					
					"What I think the DNA material 
					has done is show that intelligence must have been involved 
					in getting these extraordinary diverse elements together," 
					he said.
					
					(quoted by Richard Ostling, 
					"Leading Atheist Now Believes in God," Associated Press 
					report, Dec. 9, 2004)
				
				
				
				"Fearfully and wonderfully made"
				Although written thousands of 
				years ago, King David's words about our marvelous human 
				bodies still ring true. 
				 
				
				He wrote: 
				
					
					"For You formed my inward parts, 
					You covered me in my mother's womb. I will praise You, for I 
					am fearfully and wonderfully made... My frame was not hidden 
					from You, when I was made in secret, and skillfully 
					wrought..." 
					
					(Psalm 139:13-15, emphasis 
					added).
				
				
				Where does all this leave 
				evolution? 
				 
				
				Michael Denton, an agnostic 
				scientist, concludes: 
				
					
					"Ultimately the Darwinian theory 
					of evolution is no more nor less than the great cosmogenic 
					myth of the twentieth century." 
					
					(Denton, p. 358)
				
				
				All of this has enormous 
				implications for our society and culture. 
				 
				
				Professor Johnson makes this clear 
				when he states: 
				
					
					"Every history of the twentieth 
					century lists three thinkers as preeminent in influence: 
					Darwin, Marx and Freud. All three were regarded as 
					'scientific' (and hence far more reliable than anything 
					'religious') in their heyday.
					
					"Yet Marx and Freud have fallen, and even their 
					dwindling bands of followers no longer claim that their 
					insights were based on any methodology remotely comparable 
					to that of experimental science. I am convinced that 
					Darwin is next on the block. His fall will be by far the 
					mightiest of the three." 
					
					(Johnson, p. 113)
				
				
				Evolution has had its run for almost 
				150 years in the schools and universities and in the press.
				
				 
				
				But now, with the discovery of what 
				the DNA code is all about, the complexity of the cell, and the 
				fact that information is something vastly different from 
				matter and energy, evolution can no longer dodge the 
				ultimate outcome. 
				 
				
				The evidence certainly points to a 
				resounding checkmate for evolution!