|
CHAPTER THREE
The Fourth Reich (or the continuation
of the third)
If you want to rule the world,
you need to control oil. All the oil. Anywhere.
Michel Collon
The pioneers of a warless world
are the youth who refuse military service.
Albert Einstein
Since
September 11th, the Illuminati
agenda and manipulation techniques have become ever 1nore blatant as
they have used the United States and Britain to impose their global
control. I am going to look in detail at the appalling events that
have followed 9/11, especially the invasion of Iraq and the 'war on
terrorism', because the hidden hand of the Illuminati and their
methods of operation could not be more obvious.
Understanding this is vital to
preventing a repeat throughout the world. I have described the
background to the invasion of Afghanistan in considerable detail in
Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster. They used
the excuse of their own terrorist attacks on September 11th to
invade a stone-age country in the middle of a famine and impose
their own regime under the puppet leadership of Hamid Karsai.
He is a former advisor to the major
Texas-based oil company, Unocal, which planned to build an oil and
gas pipeline from the Caspian Sea region across western Afghanistan
to the Arabian Sea coast of Pakistan, but could not do so while the
Taliban were in power. There is an Illuminati frenzy to control and
tap the enormous reserves of oil and gas around the Caspian Sea and,
because it is land locked, they need to build pipelines to transport
it to world markets. Countries like Afghanistan and Iran are on the
potential pipeline routes (Figure 6).
Unocal had no problem negotiating with
the Taliban through the 1990s to build their pipelines across
Afghanistan and nor did the US State Department. However, public
opposition to the deal in the face of the Taliban's human rights
abuses, not least against women, made the deal impossible. Unocal
pulled out of the project in 1997 saying that the pipeline could not
be built until an internationally recognized regime was in power in
Afghanistan.
Thanks to 9/11 and the claims that the
'Afghanistan-located' CIA-asset,
Osama bin Laden, was responsible
(based on no evidence), the Illuminati-controlled United States and
British governments could send in the bombers to remove the Taliban
and replace them with the Unocal employed Hamid Karsai.1
Figure 6
The pig-trough frenzy
to control the massive Caspian Sea oil and gas reserves
is one major reason
why the US government, supported by Britain's Tony Blair,
targeted Afghanistan
after 9/11,
This is the
approximate route of the Unocal pipeline
On December 31st 2002, after the removal
of the Taliban George W. Bush appointed a man called
Zalmay Khalilzad as his 'special envoy' to Afghanistan to
oversee the 'transition' to the new post-Taliban regime. Khalilzad,
an Illuminati operative, was chief consultant to Unocal on the
Afghanistan pipeline project!
He co-wrote in the winter 2000 issue of
The Washington Quarterly:
“Afghanistan could prove a valuable
corridor for this [Caspian Sea] energy as well as for access to
markets in Central Asia."
He had tried to overcome the problem
that the Taliban was not internationally recognized by publicly
lobbying for the US government to 'reengage' with the regime that
caused untold murder, torture and suffering, and he defended the
Taliban against allegations of sponsoring terrorism.! It was partly
on Khalilzad's advice that the Clinton Administration funded the
Taliban through Pakistan intelligence, even paying the salaries of
high-ranking Taliban officials.2
So long as the Taliban played the game
with the pipeline, who cares what they do to their people?
When this plan went pear-shaped and the
pipeline had to be shelved, Khalilzad changed his position to suit
the circumstances. As a State and Defense Department official during
the Reagan-Bush administrator, he helped to supply the Mujahadeen
with weapons during the occupation by the Soviet Union, the period
when Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda were funded and armed by the
United States.
As Bush's special envoy to Afghanistan,
it was Khalilzad who helped to oversee the change-over from the
'transitional' government led by fellow Unocal front man, Hamid
Karsai, to the fully-fledged' Afghanistan' government with Karsai
again the puppet president answerable to the United States. As a
result of this, the pipeline that Karsai and Khalilzad were both
employed to make happen, is now going ahead.
Surprised?
Khalilzad comes from one of the old
ruling elite families in Afghanistan and his father was an aide to
King Zahir Shah, who ruled the country until he went into exile in
1973. Thanks to the installation of Hamid Karsai, a representative
of Zahir Shah, the king returned to the Presidential Palace in Kabul
in 2002. Since the removal of the Taliban the opium production in
Afghanistan has soared to fuel the heroin market, controlled by the
Bush family and their associates and masters, exactly as planned.
Zalmay Khalilzad was later appointed by Bush to be his envoy to
Iraq, so he could play the same scam there in arranging for a
US-controlled 'Iraqi' government to replace Saddam Hussein.
More about Khalilzad shortly - there is
plenty to know.
According to plan
The invasion of Afghanistan, like 9/11, had been planned for a long
time and it was the same with the conquest of Iraq in the spring of
2003. Time magazine reported that during a briefing for three
senators by the National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice, in
March 2002, President Bush poked his head into a White House meeting
room and bellowed,
"Fuck Saddam. We're taking him out!"
3
This was a year before the invasion and
yet, only weeks before the troops went in, we had Bush, Blair and
their fellow travelers in government still saying that war was not
inevitable!! If they ever told the truth they would have a seizure
from the shock
The plan to take Control of the Gulf
region using Saddam Hussein as the excuse was in place long before
Bush and the rest of his Illuminati mafia were illegally placed in
power against the will of the people in late 2000. An article by
writer Nicholas Lemann in the New Yorker revealed that
after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989, Dick Cheney, now the
Vice President, formed a group to plan a strategy for the 1990s and
beyond.4
This group included the current
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, the current Deputy Secretary
of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, the current Secretary of State
Colin Powell and Lewis 'Scooter' Libby, Cheney's chief
of staff.
The
aim was to 'shape' the world in their desired image or, as another
member, Zalmay Khalilzad, put it ... to "preclude the rise of
another global rival for the indefinite future".
Yes, the same Zalmay 'Unocal' Khalilzad
who would be named Bush's special envoy to Afghanistan before 9/11
followed by the same role in Iraq at the time of the invasion.
Lemann says he was shown a copy of the
document Cheney's group put together called Defense Strategy for the
1990 5: The Regional Defense
Strategy, Secretary of Defense, Dick Cheney, January 1993.
This was the month that Bill Clinton was inaugurated and Cheney and
father Bush left office. This 'strategy', planned in the early
1990s, is pretty much what the boy Bush and Cheney government is
doing today - a government controlled by the people who put the
document together.
The 'war on terrorism' was a response to
September 11th?
Sure...
Still more confirmation of this came
with the publication of a secret document produced for the
yet-to-be-not-elected Bush administration in September 2000, a year
before 9/11 and two and half years before the troops were sent into
Iraq.
The document was called
Rebuilding
America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces and Resources For A New
Century; and was produced in September 2000 by the neo-conservative
'think-tank' called The Project for the New American Century
(PNAC). You can read it in full at
the PNAC website.5
This organization was created in 1997 by people like Dick Cheney and
Donald Rumsfeld and the report was produced for themselves and other
highly significant names that are today at the heart of the Bush
administration, including Paul Wolfowitz, now Rumsfeld's deputy at
the Pentagon, and Lewis Libby, Cheney's chief of staff.
Bush's younger brother, Jeb, the
governor of Florida during the rigged presidential election, was
also involved. The usual crowd in other words. Details of the
document were published by the Sunday Herald in Scotland
6 and the contents precisely~
mirror events instigated since Bush and his controllers came to
power.
It is a blueprint for US (Illuminati)
global domination that reveals how Bush and his cabinet were
planning to invade Iraq to secure 'regime change' even before they
entered the White House in January 2001.
The PNAC report says:
"The United States has for decades
sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security.
While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate
justification, the need for a substantial American force
presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of
Saddam Hussein." 7
Note that phrase "provides the immediate
justification". This is why Bush, Blair, Powell and Co lied and
lied
and used bogus "intelligence" to desperately make a case for the
war in Iraq.
They didn't have a reason, so they had
to invent one, as they did with Afghanistan, to follow the hidden
agenda. Their first choice was 'weapons of mass destruction', a term
that was repeated over and over on the basis of the more times you
say something the more people are likely to believe you. As with
'Bin Laden did it', there was no proof or even evidence, only
constant repetition of what they want the public to believe (see
Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster for the Bin
Laden background).
When Hans Blix and his UN weapons
inspectors found nothing to support the claims about weapons of mass
destruction, Blair and Powell became ever more desperate, detailing
"compelling intelligence" that the weapons existed. This I evidence'
turned out to be stolen virtually word for word from an analysis
written 12 years earlier by a postgraduate student in California,
but it was presented to the public as the work of British
intelligence. It was lifted from an article by Ibrahim al Mirashi
and even spelling and punctuation errors from the original were
repeated.
They did, however, change words to· make
them sound more sinister. Iraqi intelligence "monitoring foreign
embassies in Iraq", became "spying on foreign embassies in Iraq".
Even that is nothing more than the CIA
and British Intelligence do themselves.
"Aiding opposition groups in hostile
regimes", was upgraded to "supporting terrorist organizations in
hostile regimes" ..
I'm too sexy for my lies
Andrew Gilligan, a BBC Defense and Diplomatic
correspondent, said he had been told by a significant source
(later confirmed as British weapons inspector, Dr David Kelly) that
a dossier on the Saddam 'threat' was changed by Blair's office on
the orders of his minder and Spinner-in-Chief, Alastair Campbell.8
The intelligence report had not been "very revelatory" when it
arrived at Downing Street, Gilligan says Kelly told him, but it was"
transformed to make it sexier".
It was embellished to manipulate the
people into supporting the war and included the outrageous claim
that Saddam could deploy weapons of mass destruction in 45 minutes.
Two other BBC reporters were told by Kelly in milder terms than the
Blair press office (controlled by Campbell) changed the wording of
the dossier. Blair said the BBC story was "as serious' an attack on
my integrity as there could possibly be".9
But how can you attack something that
does not exist?
Campbell was 'cleared' of the 'sexing
up' allegation by a committee of MPs only on the casting vote of the
chairman, a member of Blair's own Labour Party. This was done even
though the committee acknowledged that its work had been "hampered"
by the refusal to allow them access to intelligence papers and
security services personnel! Hampered?? How can they make a decision
about Campbell when they can't even interview1those involved?
They
have to take his word for it, basically.
Outrageous.
Campbell later announced he was
resigning as Blair's 'Mr Spin', but the manipulation of the public
mind will continue because lies are essential to the cover story. '
Then came the strange death of Dr Kelly, the source of Gilligan's
report. He was 'outed' by Geoff Hoon's Ministry of Defense after he
told them that he met Gilligan and could be the source of the report
that had caused the government to make concerted attacks on the BBC.
Kelly was given a rough time by the
Blair-controlled House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee when he
appeared before then\. to be questioned about what happened; A few
days later he went for a walk in the countryside near his home in
Oxfordshire and did not return. He was found in a secluded wood with
his wrist cut and the official story was that he committed suicide
and bled to death. The inference was that the pressure had made him
do it.
But this is the same David Kelly
who faced the wrath of the Sad dam regime as a weapons inspector
after the 1991 Gulf War and coped with something similar from
Russian officials during an investigation there. This guy could
stand his ground. Shortly before he left on his 'suicide walk' he
emailed associates with "combative" comments about the pressure he
was under from "many dark actors playing games". He said he hoped it
would all blow over and he could get back to Baghdad and get on with
the work that really mattered.
When he left his home, his wife, Janice,
was unconcerned. Although she knew her 59-year-old husband was
deeply upset, his mental state did not seem to be too down. Walking
was a hobby and he often disappeared for up to two or three hours.
Paul Weaver, a local farmer,
greeted Kelly as he strode through the fields close to his home and
there was nothing to suggest a suicidal man.
"He smiled and said hello", Weaver
recalled 10 Kelly had
family matters to look forward to like the marriage of one of
his daughters in October.
He was devoted to his wife and family
and he did not show signs of someone who was about to kill himself.
But then he was found dead, the police say, in an isolated wood with
his wrist slashed with a pen knife. There was no goodbye to his wife
and family, nothing. Does this make sense to you? Me neither.
Blair's Ministry of Mendacity also said there was a link between
Saddam and al-Qaeda until intelligence sources leaked the news that
they had found no such connection. Intelligence professionals in the
United States have taken a similar line.
A group of retired intelligence
operatives said in a letter to President Bush:
"There is one unpardonable sin.
Cooking intelligence to the recipe of high policy. There is
ample evidence that this has been done in Iraq."
11
A member of the Pentagon's Defense
Intelligence Agency told the New York Times:
"The American people-were
manipulated." 12
Clare Short, who resigned as
Blair's international development secretary in protest at the spin,
said he had misled the public over the scale of the threat posed by
Iraq to ensure support for the war.
"I have concluded that the PM
decided to go to war in August sometime and he duped us all
along", she told the Sunday Telegraph. "He had decided
for reasons that he alone knows to go to war over Iraq and to
create this sense of urgency and drive it - the way the
intelligence was spun was part of that drive."
13
His reasons were to follow the agenda of
his unseen masters who put him into power and can either keep him
there or cause his downfall. Short said that Blair secretly agreed
with George Bush in the autumn of 2002 that they would invade Iraq
the following spring "come what may".14
The secrecy that followed, in which even Blair's cabinet was kept
out of the loop, hampered the planning for the aftermath of the war
and helped to produce the "chaos and suffering" that ensued, she
said.
Decisions were made in Blair's office in
calls to President Bush, Short revealed, and in phone conversations
between Blair's foreign policy advisor, Sir David Manning and
National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice. Short said Blair
had lied about wanting a second United Nations resolution supporting
the invasion; he had lied by claiming that Iraq was "an immediate
threat to us in 45 minutes"; and he lied that French President
Jacques Chirac would veto a second resolution under any
circumstances.
This was not true, said Short,15
Tony Blair lies more often and more obviously than any other
British politician of modem times (despite the fierce competition)
and one reason he gets away with it is because it is beyond the
comprehension of many that anyone could lie so constantly and
blatantly to the people he is supposed to serve. Well, he can and
does - every day.
So do Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz,
Powell and their cabal...
They are following the techniques of the
Nazis, as outlined by Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf:
"All propaganda must be so popular
and on such an intellectual level that even the most stupid of
those toward whom it is directed will understand it. People can
be made to perceive paradise as hell, and the other way round,
to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise."
16
In the United States, leaked information
from the Department of Defense revealed that a top secret report by
the Defense Intelligence Agency in September 2002 concluded they
could find no evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq. Some CIA
officials distanced themselves from the Bush administration claims
that Iraq posed an imminent threat.
They said these claims were based on
information given directly to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
by Ahmed Chalabi, the leader of the CIA-funded Iraqi National
Congress and the man the Pentagon would like to be leader of Iraqi.
More about him later. Reports quoted CIA sources as saying that
Chalabi's 'information' was deeply suspect and largely based on
hearsay from other defectors with vested interests in regime change
(they made it up).
Bob Graham, the top Democrat on
the Senate Intelligence Committee, told the media that classified
evidence that supported the Bush claims about Iraqi weapons was made
public, but he said that as a member of the Intelligence Committee
he saw much evidence that didn't support its case.
"That evidence was never
declassified", he said.
All this when the United States and
Britain have access to a satellite surveillance system that can read
your number plate from space and this is how the Airman magazine
described the capabilities of the Global Hawk unmanned surveillance
plane deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq:
"On an early test, for example,
Global Hawk flew at 56,000 feet over the Naval Weapons Center at
China Lake, California. The images it gathered were so clear
that an electro optical image stands out next to a FA-18
Fighter. An infrared image showed where concrete had cooled down
from the shadow of a C-130 that had recently taken off."
And they couldn't locate :weapons of
mass destruction'? Or find Bin Laden? Or Saddam Hussein?
Fakes and fantasy
Colin Powell and the United States claimed that a document
existed to show that Niger had sold uranium to Iraq for nuclear
weapons. This' document' was exposed as a crude fake by the
International Atomic Agency. Joseph Wilson, the US ambassador
to Gabon from 1992 to 1995, wrote in the New York Times how
he had been hired by the CIA to investigate the alleged Niger
connection and had found no evidence.
He communicated his findings to the US
government and he said:
"Based on my experience with the
administration in the months leading up to the war, I have
little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence
related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to
exaggerate the Iraqi threat.”18
They lied.
Powell told NBC:
“It was the information that we had.
We provided it. If that information is inaccurate, fine.”19
No, darlin', it was information you made
up to manipulate the people and that's not fine.
Quite simply, you
were caught lying, Mr. Powell, the exposure of which is hardly brain
surgery. Remember how Powell presented his 'evidence' to the United
Nations Security Council with his make-believe charts,
'intelligence' satellite photographs and recordings of phone calls
by Iraqi officials?
All bullshit - and he knew it. It was the
same with the drone aircraft that we were told could attack the East
Coast of the United States. Pure invention to sell a lie. When Bush
and Co were caught out on the 'Iraq nuclear plans' fabrication they
arranged for the CIA chief, George Tenet, to take the blame to
protect them. He said it had been a CIA “error”. At the same time
the Americans were distancing themselves from the 'nuclear'
statements, Tony Blair was still saying that the intelligence was
correct.
Mixed up the song sheets there then?
Powell told the United Nations in
February 2003 that Saddam had authorized his field commanders to use
chemical weapons. So why weren't they used when the US and Britain
invaded? And why weren't the weapons he authorized found when the
Iraqi 'army' was overrun? The United States Army commander in Iraq
said after the war that nothing had been found to show the country's
military was prepared to use them on US forces.
Lieutenant-General William Wallace,
commander of the army's 5th Corps, said US forces had uncovered "no
evidence of him trying to employ them directly against US troops”.20
Why the hell not? I thought Iraq's
'weapons of mass destruction' were a threat to the world and yet
they aren't even used to defend their own country from invasion and
takeover?
Powell was lying, as he was with his
claims that Saddam's weapon-making units were housed in trucks
moving from place to place. It would be laughable if the outcome of
the mendacity had not been so tragic for the people of Iraq. Behind
Powell when he made his UN address were blue drapes hung that
morning to cover a massive tapestry reproduction of Picasso's famous
anti-war painting called Guernica.
The UN's Stephane Dujaric, said:
“We needed the right background that
would work on television."
Yeah, OK.
Powell also said that they had
intelligence proof. that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, but
could not give details for fear of exposing the informants to
danger. Excuse me if I fail to believe that people like Powell
really give a damn about exposing anyone to danger so long as the
agenda is served. And hold on. How would it expose informants to
danger if the US had simply told the UN inspectors where to look?
With Saddam's regime removed, there was no danger at all to
informants. So why didn't the Americans immediately follow their
'intelligence proof' and find the weapons?
Months after the war began, there was
still nothing. The British cabinet minister, David Blunkett,
is a former 'socialist' and now, in my view, the most right wing
Home Secretary of modem times. He said even while the war was going
on that no chemical, biological or nuclear weapons of mass
destruction may be found, and yet this was the 'justification' for
the war.
He said that, in any case, he rejoiced
at the 'fall' of Saddam Hussein and his regime regardless of whether
any weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq or not.21
Unbelievable.
But I still would not be surprised to
see 'weapons' of some kind 'found' once they have managed to ship
them there! As the lies were exposed Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld said that Saddam may have destroyed the weapons before the
war started!
Err, so why was there a war? Why didn't
Saddam make this mass destruction very public to avoid being
invaded?
Rumsfeld's 'deputy' and the real power
in the Pentagon, Paul Wolfowitz, told Vanity Fair that
the claims about Sad dam's weapons capability were used to justify
the war for "bureaucratic reasons".22
It was "the one reason everyone could
agree on", he said. The other factor he described as "huge" was that
an attack would allow America to pull its troops from Saudi Arabia
and resolve a major grievance held by al-Qaeda. Oh, so the 'war on
terrorism' involves giving in to the alleged terrorists, then? What
nonsense. Pulling the troops out of Saudi Arabia is part of a
strategy that will eventually send them back in again to take the
country over.
But the best excuse for not finding weapons of mass
destruction came, naturally, from
George W. Bush.
He said in his weekly radio address on
Sunday, June 22nd 2003, that they had been looted!! When the alleged
weapons were not found in Iraq - or had not yet been planted - it was
claimed that the finding of mass graves were justification enough
for the war. What they didn't tell you was that those graves were
overwhelmingly the result of uprisings being put down by Saddam
after the 1991 Gulf conflict.
These rebellions were the result of
encouragement from President's father
George Bush, who then refused
to support them and left the people to their fate - mass graves.
Shooting the messenger
The United Nation's Hans Blix said that American officials
tried to discredit the work of his weapons inspectors in Iraq to
further their own case for war. He told the BBC of his "disquiet" at
how the documents the International Atomic Energy Agency "had no
great difficulty finding out were fake", managed to get through US
and UK intelligence analysis.
Also disturbing, he said, was the
question of who was responsible for the falsification.23 As usual
the fake documents to make the case for an Illuminati war did not"
get 'through US and UK intelligence analysis"; they faked them in
the first place, as per normal. After the conflict the United States
and Britain refused to allow Blix and UN inspectors to return to
Iraq to search for the alleged weapons. Instead, the provided its
own inspection teams. Blix called for experts 'to return to the
country to determine whether the weapons allegations had any
foundation.
Are you kidding? Does he really think
the criminals in the US and British administrations are really going
to allow him back to prove they have been lying all along?
Tony Blair dismissed demands from
members of his own Labour Party for an inquiry into how the public
was misled about Saddam's 'weapons of mass destruction' that were
cited as the reason why the war was necessary. He knows a proper,
truly independent inquiry, would expose his mendacity.
Retired CIA intelligence analyst Ray
McGovern, a member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity,
said:
"Some of my colleagues are virtually
certain that there will be some weapons of mass destruction
found, even though they might have to be planted. I'm just as
sure that some few will be found, but not in an amount that by
any stretch would justify the charge of a threat against the US
or anyone else. Even if the planting was discovered by and by,
they'll say, 'OK, the weapon were planted fine”.
And remember: these genetic liars are
the same people who have told the world what happened on September
11th, who did it, and how - the official story of 9/11 that has been
used to 'justify' all that has followed. The idea that the invasion
was about 'liberating' Iraqis is a grotesque joke. They were so
desperate to sell the idea of an international 'coalition' that they
included in their laughable list of supporting countries the Solomon
Islands and Tonga. The Solomon Islands doesn't even have a military!
By March 30th 2003, Donald Rumsfeld was
telling Fox [propaganda] News that the 'coalition' had now to 66
countries. It was simply another lie. Allan Kemakeza, Prime Minister
of the Solomon Islands, said 'his country was not part of the
coalition,' despite being listed.25
The Slovenian Prime Minister Anton
Rop said the same and Croatia was listed even though its
president, Stipe Mesic, condemned the war on Iraq as
"illegitimate".26 The Czech
Republic was listed when its president, Vaclav Klaus, said
that anyone who thinks democracy can be imposed on Iraq is "from
another universe".27
Or as investigative journalist, Wayne
Madsen wrote in Counter Punch:
"Klaus means that people like Bush,
Tony Blair, Rumsfeld and the other neo-Crusaders are just plain
nuts. Indeed they are."28
But if you haven't got support, invent
some. If you haven't got an enemy, invent one.
Author Joseph
Schumpeter said of the [Illuminati] Roman Empire:
"There was no
comer of the known world where some interest was not alleged to
be in danger or under actual attack. If the interests were not
Roman, they were those of Rome's allies; and if Rome had no
allies, the allies would be invented."
29
The Bush message was:
"If you support us we are going to
war with Iraq, if you don't support us we are going to war with
Iraq."
It’s the mentality of the playground
bully. People have asked why Bush and Blair would not listen to
arguments for allowing UN weapons inspectors more time to search for
the alleged 'weapons of mass destruction' and took no account of-the
Massive global protests or opinions of other governments. The answer
is that they were following the agenda of their unseen masters and
nothing was going to divert them from that.
They wouldn't dare.
Inmates control the asylum
Blair, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, British Foreign Secretary
Jack Straw and their like, knew they were peddling false information
for no other reason than to provide the "immediate justification" to
move into the Gulf in line with the Illuminati's long-time strategy
for global control.
The Project for the New American
Century report for the Bush cabal in September 2000 planned a,
"blueprint for maintaining global US
preeminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival, and
shaping the international security order in line with American
principles and interests".30
What it calls this "American grand
strategy" must be advanced for "as far into the future as possible"
and it says that the US must "fight and decisively win multiple,
simultaneous major theatre wars" as a "core mission"
31
American armed forces are described as
"the cavalry on the new American frontier".32
The report also said:
Allies like the UK are "the most
effective and efficient means of exercising American global
leadership". Peacekeeping missions demand "American political
leadership rather than that of the United Nations" ...
Even should Saddam pass from the scene,
the bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will remain permanently, despite
domestic opposition in the Gulf regimes to the stationing of US
troops, as,
"Iran may well prove as large a
threat to US interests as Iraq has", North Korea, Libya, Syria
and Iran are dangerous regimes and their existence justifies the
creation of a "world-wide command-and-control system" [World
Army] China should be targeted for "regime change" and the
report says "it is time to increase the presence of American
forces in Southeast Asia" that may lead to "American and allied
power providing the spur to the process of democratization in
China".
"US Space Forces" should dominate space and it calls for the
total control of cyberspace to prevent "enemies" [anyone
exposing the agenda] using the Internet against the US
[Illuminati],
"The US should consider the use of biological weapons and that
“new” methods of attack – electronic, ‘nonlethal’, biological –
will be more widely available … combat likely will take place in
new dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of
microbes... advanced form of biological warfare that can
‘target’ specific genotypes may transform biological warfare
from the realm of the terror to a politically useful tool."
33
Once again, note the language: "specific
genotypes" - the biological targeting of particular races.
Who said Hitler was dead?
A major target for Illuminati genocide
are the black peoples, especially of Africa, and that is why the
manufactured of Aids' plague has been visited on that continent. I
found it so sad that Live Aid's Bob Geldof could be so naive
as to praise President Bush for helping Africa when the forces
working through Bush are determined to destroy its people.
The strings attached money Bush pledged
to "fight Aids" in Africa is a round of drinks compared with the
wealth stolen and extorted from that continent by the 'West' every
year. The sick minds behind this biological warfare targeting
"specific genotypes" are the same people who had the nerve to say
that Iraq must be invaded because it had biological weapons or, as
their Newspeak mantra puts it: ''Weapons of mass destruction."
The veteran Labour Member of Parliament,
Tam Dalyell, said of the PNAC report:
"This is a blueprint for US world
domination - a new world order of their making. These are the
thought processes of fantasist Americans who want to control the
world. I am appalled that a British Labour Prime Minister should
have got into bed with a crew which has this moral standing."
34
But they are not fantasist Americans as
such. They are fantasist initiates and pawns of
the Illuminati that have placed
their operatives in positions of power within the US government.
Their focus is not with being American or what is best for
Americans, but with using that nation to progress the Illuminati
agenda for the global fascist state.
The reason that Tony Blair is so
slavishly supporting the 'US' no matter what happens is because he
is also an Illuminati placeman who is there to serve his hidden
masters, just like Bush. Do as you are told, guys, and you'll be
fine. Fail to deliver and "Houston, we have a problem". They are far
more terrified of those who control them than they are of the
consequences in public popularity.
The Bush group's blueprint for global
domination summarized above is clearly unfolding by the month with
the Iraq phase underway and Syria, Iran and North Korea already
being targeted by the spinners who demonize countries as a prelude
to invasion. The resistance they are facing in Iraq, however, is
making their plans far more difficult and the lack of 'weapons of
mass destruction' has produced an increasingly skeptical public.
Blair's credibility is in tatters. It's not as straightforward as
they thought it was going to be.
People may find the mention of China as
a target to be a staggering suggestion, but, as I have mentioned in
my books, talks and interviews for years, many different contacts
have told me that it was all leading to a manipulated conflict with
China.
In my book,
The Biggest Secret,
published two years before the Project for the New American
Century document, I wrote:
" ... The plan is to engineer
events, real and staged to create enormous fear in the countdown
years to 2012. This includes a plan to start a third world war
either by stimulating the Muslim world into a 'holy war' against
the West or by using the Chinese to cause global conflict.
Maybe both." 35
A CIA scientist I met in 1997 was only
one of many people who have told me that a conflict with China is
where the agenda is leading.
They want a global war for the same
reason they wanted the two in the 20th century. A global problem
opens the way to a global solution - the creation of a world
government and army to "prevent another war". With the world economy
in a catastrophic state after such a conflict the way would be open
for a world central bank and currency to "rebuild the
financial system".
And, of course, we would need to
microchip the people to protect
them from the baddies.
Who benefits from 9/11?
Now what was the trigger for the 'war on terrorism'? What has been
the foundation of the cover story for global conquest by what is
nothing less than the Fourth Reich? Why, of course, it is
the attacks of September 11th,
which President Bush called "Our Pearl Harbour".
Welt well, well.
The Project for the New American
Century (PNAC) document, produced a year before 9/11,
says that their blueprint for conquest or their "process of
transformation" was likely to be long and slow" absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor".
And
what happened at just the right moment to advance their plans
dramatically? 9/11.
The American Free Press asked
Christopher Maletz, assistant director of the PNAC, what was
meant by the need for" a new Pearl Harbor". He said they needed more
money to increase the defense budget for new arms and future
capabilities.
"Without some disaster or
catastrophic event the politicians and the military we have not
have approved this", Maletz said.36
Thanks to 9/11, Congress allocated $40
billion to fund the 'war ( on terrorism' and the 2002 military
budget alone was,$348.7 billion with further massive rises to come.
This is exactly what the PNAC document
called for and, because of 9/11 it is happening. Coincidence? Can a
whale fit in a matchbox?
In truth, this is not an 'American'
agenda for global conquest, that's just the cover to hide the fact
that what we are seeing happen is the Illuminati agenda that I, and
many others, have been exposing all these years.
The United States is just their vehicle,
that's all. They couldn't care less about those who call themselves
American any more 'than they could those in any other country.
Neither is the Project for the New American Century report just the
work of a few loony right-wing fanatics, as is claimed. It is a
summary of part of the Illuminati agenda as it is planned to
proceed over the next few years.
Look at the personnel of the PNAC
and the network of connecting organizations.
They have become known as 'neo-cons'.
Donald Rumsfeld (PNAC
founding member): Defense Secretary in the 'war on
terrorism', who is ensuring that the blueprint produced by his
own organization comes to pass.
Rumsfeld visited Baghdad in 1983 to
arrange for the shipment of chemical and biological weapons
Saddam Hussein from the Reagan-Bush administration and in 2000
he was on the board of the European engineering company, ABB,
when it supplied nuclear technology to North Korea. This is yet
another example of the secret agenda and the movie running
alongside each other.
Rumsfeld was involved in supplying
the 'problems' that the movie could later claim made action
necessary against Iraq and North Korea.
Paul Wolfowitz (PNAC founding member): Deputy
Defense Secretary, whom Bush calls "Wolfie". He is a far right
supporter of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
(Jinsa) - a "think-tank that puts Israel and its security at the
heart of US foreign policy".37
Wolfowitz, who has relatives in Israel, has also served as the
Bush administration's liaison to the American Israel Public
Affairs Committee and has extremely close ties to the government
of Israel.
This is just the background you need
to be seen as impartial on Middle East policy. Wolfowitz is the
real power at the Pentagon, more so than Rumsfeld. Rarely is the
person officially in charge the one who is really in control.
Dick Cheney (PNAC founding
member): Vice President and on the board of advisors of
the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs Jinsa.
He was Defense Secretary to father
George Bush during the 1991 Gulf War and he's the real power in
the White House behind the village idiot. Cheney was head of the
oil services giant, Halliburton, - from 1995 to 2000 when the
company enjoyed contracts with Saddam Hussein's Iraq and worked
with other terrorist dictatorships to line their pockets. Cheney
is a very disturbed entity indeed (see my other books).
Lewis Libby (PNAC founding member): Chief of Staff
to Cheney, close friend, confidant and protégé of Wolfowitz. He
served in father George Bush's Defense Department and is
closely connected with the Illuminati Rand Corporation, or
companies, and the defense contractor, Northrop Grumman, which,
like the Rand Corporation, enjoys massive contracts with the
Pentagon.
Libby was a lawyer for convicted
felon and Israeli spy Mark Rich, who was pardoned by Illuminati
front man and crook, Bill Clinton, in his last days as
president.
James Woolsey: another Jinsa
member and former director of the CIA-from 1993-95, who was
apparently lined up to become the minister of 'information' in
the post-war Iraq. Can you imagine a CIA chief as minister for
'information'? Woolsey, a member of the US Policy Defense Board
at the Pentagon, said he believes the United States is going to
be involved for several decades in helping to "change the face"
of the Middle East.38
He also said:
"We will make a lot of people
very nervous and we will hear, for example, the Mubarak
regime in Egypt or the Saudi royal family thinking about the
idea of these Americans spreading of democracy in this part
of the world. They will say you make us very nervous. Our
response should be ... good." 39
Woolsey studied at Oxford University
between 1963 and 1965 when he was awarded an Illuminati Rhodes
Scholarship (just like Bill Clinton). See And The Truth Shall
Set You Free for more on the Rhodes Scholar network.
John Bolton: served with the
State Department, Justice Department and the government's
international 'aid' agency, USAID, under father George Bush. He
is now under-:secretary for arms control and international
security in the State Department. Bolton is a major player in
the policy on Iraq and was also one of Bush's chad-counters
during the rigged election in Florida. He is a member of the
Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs Jinsa) and is a
vice-president at the far-right American Enterprise Institute as
well as being involved with the Project for the New American
Century. Bolton is reported to think the 'war on terrorism' is
World War Four and could take 40 years to finish.
Jeb Bush: brother of the brain cell and Governor of
Florida during the election fraud that stopped Al Gore becoming
president. The Bush family is corrupt to its core and
fundamentally' connected into the Illuminati web as my other
books have extensively detailed.
Zalmay Khalilzad: the Afghanistan-born American who was
made special envoy to Afghanistan before the war that installed
his fellow Unocal employee, Hamid Karsai, as leader. Khalilzad
authored a book on Saddam with Wolfowitz called Overthrow Him
and encouraged his close friend, George 'Illuminati' Shultz, the
former Reagan-Bush Secretary of State, to use Iran to bring down
Sad dam. Like Lewis Libby, he has worked for the Illuminati Rand
Corporation and he also served under National Security Advisor,
Condoleezza Rice, when she was a director of Chevron, a company
that stands to benefit enormously from the conquest of Iraq and
the pipelines across Afghanistan now that the Taliban have gone.
Khalilzad has close connections to
both events. Once his job was done in Afghanistan, Khalilzad was
appointed Bush's 'special envoy' to Iraq to playa similar role
by installing a US puppet-government. He was a graduate student
at the University of Chicago, an 'intellectual' centre for the
American right wing. He became a special advisor to the State
Department under Reagan-Bush when he was very much involved in
the arming of the Mujahadeen fighting the Russian occupation and
this included Osama bin Laden and what became al-Qaeda.
He later became undersecretary of
defense to father George Bush and headed the .transition team
for the Defense Department, advising Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld after boy Bush was manipulated into power. He was then
appointed to the National Security Council and reports to his
old friend at Chevron, Condoleezza Rice.
Elliott Abrams: pleaded guilty on two counts of lying to
Congress about the IranContra arms-for-drugs scandal, but was
pardoned by father George Bush. Abrams tried to cover up the
murder of hundreds of civilians at EI Mooted by an elite US
trained military unit in EI Salvador. In 1993 a UN truth
commission, which investigated 22,000 atrocities during the
twelve-year El Salvador civil war, found that 85% of the abuses
were the 'work of the Reagan-Bush-Abrams-supported rightwing
military.
Condoleezza Rice appointed
Abrams, as, get this, Senior Director for Democracy, Human
Rights and International Operations at the National Security
Council in 2001. A year later she made him Senior Director for
Near East and North African Affairs, including Arab-Israel
relations and American efforts to promote "peace and security"
in the region.
Abrams is on the advisory board of
the Media Research Center, an organization that opposes
liberalism on television or in films.
John Negroponte: the Bush ambassador to the United
Nations with a horrific history. He was a major aide to the US
embassy in Vietnam from 1964, an advisor to the war criminal
Henry Kissinger, and in charge of Vietnam policy on the US
National Security Council. In the 1980s he carried out the
covert policy of Reagan-Bush to destroy the elected Sandinista
government in Nicaragua and in Honduras he administered a
massive increase in US military support for the right-wing
government. It soared from $4m to $77m and the country became
known as USS Honduras.
Negroponte was also fundamentally
involved with the infamous Battalion 3-16 in Honduras that ran a
terror campaign of murder and torture against the people.
Richard Perle (PNAC founding
member): former Assistant Defense Secretary to
Reagan-Bush, a leading member of the Jewish Institute for
National Security Affairs (Jinsa) and the chairman of the
far-right American Enterprise Institute (AEI) on 17th Street in
Washington, which has Cheney's wife, Lynne, among its
membership. Fourteen members of this AEI organization are in the
Bush cabinet and others are elsewhere in the administration.
Bush told an AEI conference on
February 26th, 2003:
"At the American Enterprise
Institute some of the finest minds in our nation are at work
in some of the greatest challenges to our nation. You do
such good work that my administration has borrowed 20 such
minds."41
Perle has so many of his associates
in the Bush government that they are known as the "string of
Perles".42
At the Pentagon, Perle was nicknamed
the "Prince of Darkness" for his hard beliefs and he introduced
a number of staunchly pro-Israel activists who dramatically
increased weapons sales to Israel. He is a former employee of an
Israeli weapons manufacturer, Soltam. Perle is a member of
several other - wing groups like the Foundation for the Defense
of Democracies (along with James Woolsey, the former CIA chief
and member of the Project for the New American Century), and he
is referred to as the "neo-cons political godfather".
Perle is a former aide to one-time
Israeli premier, Benjamin Netanyahu, and in 1996 he
simultaneously advised both the Bob Dole campaign in the United
States and the Netanyahu campaign in Israel. Perle was also
advisor to the lobbying firm run by Douglas J. Feith, the
Pentagon's under-secretary of defense. Before the invasion of
Iraq, Perle advised clients of the investment house, Goldman
Sachs, about investment opportunities in Iraq when the US was in
control. He is a director of the software company, Autonomy
Corp, which includes the Pentagon among its clients.
Autonomy says it expected its
profits to increase dramatically after the war. Perle is a
member of the Defense Policy Board that advises the Pentagon.
Another member is Henry Kissinger, a major Illuminati
operative of the last 40 years. Perle had to resign as chairman
of the Board when conflicts of-interest were exposed.
My god, how many?
He resigned after it was reported he
had worked as s consultant to the bankrupt telecommunications
company, Global Crossing Ltd., which was trying to get Pentagon
approval to be sold to Asian investors. The Los Angeles Times
revealed that Perle briefed an investment seminar on ways to
profit from the conflict in Iraq and North Korea just weeks
after he received a top-secret government briefing on the two
countries.44
The Defense Intelligence Agency
briefing that Perle attended took place in February 2003, the
Times reported, and he held his seminar three weeks later. The
Times further cited agendas of the meetings· and other documents
to show that Perle and fellow advisers received a classified
address about military communications systems.
Perle runs Trireme Partners,
a venture capital firm that has been exploring such high-tech
investments.45
"The guiding principle here is
that you do not give advice in the Defense Policy Board on
any particular matter in Which you have an interest", Perle
said. "And I don't do that. I haven't done that."
46
I think old Rich has another guiding
principle, myself, although principle is not the word that comes
immediately to mind.
Perle told the BBC:
"The President of the United
States on issue after issue has reflected the views of
neo-conservatives. I think he comes to his view in his own
way and through his own experience, but it happens to track
very closely with the outlook of neoconservatives,
especially since 9/11."47
Firstly, Bush doesn't have any
experience, nor a mind that could assimilate it; and second, the
'neocons' manipulated Bush into the presidency to front their
agenda and he does whatever they tell him.
Michael Ledeen: Wow. Another
member of the American Enterprise Institute and involved in the
1970s in the "shadowy world of right-wing Italian politics".48
Ledeen has close ties to Henry
Kissinger, the Illuminati 'Roman Catholic' front, Opus Dei,
and the Italian P-2 Masonic Lodge involving his associate,
Licio Gelli, a far, far, right Illuminati operator (see And
The Truth Shall Set You Free).49
As I mentioned earlier, Gelli, a
Mussolini fascist and Knight of Malta, was the Grand Master of
P-2. It was involved in the murder of the Italian politician,
Aldo Moro, and other terrorist outrages by the so-called Red
Brigade. P-2 and Gelli - were behind the Vatican banking scandal
featuring "God's
Banker" Roberto Calvi who was silenced by
being ritually murdered under Blackfriars Bridge at the entrance
to the City of London (And the Truth Shall Set You Free has the
background).
Francesco Pazienza, who is
also reported to be close to Michael Ledeen ,so was suspected of
setting up Calvi for murder and at the time of his death Calvi's
family said he was killed by Opus Dei. Gelli and Pazienza, both
associates of Ledeen, were jailed for their crimes, but not
before Gelli was invited to the inauguration ceremony for
President Ronald Reagan, the puppet for father George Bush, in
1981. Gelli and P-2 were closely connected with the
Priory of Sion, the secret
society going back with the Knights Templar to the 12th century
and dedicated to the advancement of the Merovingian (big-time
Illuminati) bloodline (see The Biggest Secret).
When the Italian authorities raided
Gelli's Roman villa in 1991, they found files listing members of
affiliated secret societies that formed a “cabal within a
cabal”. These included Opus Dei with its thousands of initiates
worldwide and the membership lists of the Knights Templar. Among
the P-2 members was the current Prime Minister of Italy,
Silvio Berlusconi.
Surprised? No, nor me.
This is the real background to those
now controlling the American and British governments on the 'war
on terrorism'. Michael Ledeen also had secret meetings with the
Israeli government in the 1980s that led, "inadvertently" he
says, to the Iran-Contra guns for drugs affair coordinated
through the Reagan-Bush White House.51
Now, since 9/11, as the BBC reported, Ledeen's "shadowy neo-con
talents are back in favor".52
In 2001, Ledeen was co-chair of the
US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. This is
significant given the neo-Nazi plan for a conflict with China.
Ledeen says:
"All the great scholars who have
studied the American character have come to the conclusion
that we are a war-like people. We love war."
53
He talks of the need to "free" Iran,
Syria, Saudi Arabia, Libya and North Korea after the invasion of
Iraq.
"No-one would have imagined that
the United States could, and maybe should, consider France
and Germany as strategic enemies", he said, "and yet they
have behaved now for several months as if they are strategic
enemies."
Ledeen, who has a model of Darth
Vader on his desk, naturally says he is a student of the arch
manipulator Machiavelli and his attitude was encapsulated by
this remark:
"Richard [Perle] says he doesn't
think Americans are vindictive. Well I hope he's wrong."
55
Jim Lobe of the Inter
Press Service in Washington has been compiling files on the
'neo-cons' since the 1970s when he realized how influential they
could be.
He says of Michael Ledeen:
"People were very surprised to
see that of the [very few] people who Karl Rove, Bush's
closest advisor, ... talks to ... that are knowledgeable in
foreign affairs ... one of them is Michael Ledeen and that
will be a cause for sleepless nights for many people I would
think. He is a provocateur and he's written more than once
that the thing he really dislikes about the foreign policy
establishment is that it thinks in terms of stability rather
than revolution and radical change. "
56
As Ledeen told the UK Daily
Telegraph:
"Undermining the governments of
other countries? No big deal."
Douglas J. Feith:
under-secretary for policy at the Pentagon, who selects the.
members of the Defense Policy Board. He is on the board of
advisers of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
Jinsa) and was a lawyer to defense contractors, Northrop
Grumman. Feith was given an award by the Zionist Organization of
America, citing him as a "pro-Israel activist".58
He is a, representative of an
"Israeli armaments manufacturer", Dov Zakheim.59
I saw him interviewed on British television as I was completing
this book and it seemed to me that he had undergone a charisma
by-pass. Michael Joyce: the former president of the massively
influential Bradley Foundation that created The Project for a
New American Century.
It has also provided millions in
funding for the PNAC, the American Enterprise Institute and a
long list of other neo-~on organizations and authors. One such
writer claimed that poverty was due to the genetic traits of a
sub class of human beings - classic Illuminati racism. Joyce is a
close associate of the pedophile William Bennett, the
Education Secretary to Ronald Reagan, and the pedophile father
George Bush.
Bennett was rumored to be involved
in the education system in Iraq after the war. God help the
kids, then. Joyce claims to be a "moral guardian" of American
family values and he is an advisor to Americans for Victory over
Terrorism, a group that wants to prevent criticism of American
military policy.
A fellow advisor is James Woolsey, the former
head of the CIA, who was reported to be in line to be the
minister of 'information' in the post-war Iraq.
Meyrav Wurmser: a
neo-Conservative "writer" with the Illuminati Hudson Institute,
who monitors the Arab Press for "anti-Semitic" remarks.
Her husband, David, is an advisor at
the State Department and both are with the far right-wing,
give-war-a-chance, American Enterprise Institute.
Joshua Muravchik: a member of
the American Enterprise Institute who has no problem with a
devastating war on the Korean peninsular, so long as, like the
rest of these sad people, they don't have to take part
themselves.
Muravchik told the BBC that removing
the "nuclear threat" of North Korea,
" ... might include having to
try to destroy it by military strikes." He said such a war
would be "far worse than in Iraq, it'd be a war in which
thousands arid thousands of Koreans would die and maybe
thousands of Americans as well".
But who gives a shit, Josh; you
won't be there will you?
David Frum: wrote Bush's
"axis of evil" speech that targeted Iraq, Iran and North Korea.
He is a 'scholar' at the American Enterprise Institute. From was
a Bush speech-writer for two years from 2001. He wrote a
sycophantic book about Bush called The Right Man that was hailed
on all the television networks a "controversial".
He would then appear and tell the
viewers what a wonderful president Bush was. From said on the
eve of the Iraqi slaughter:
"I pray for the success of
American army" 61
Oh, I'm sure the gods will oblige.
William Kristol: former chief
of staff to Dan Quayle, the vice president to father Bush, and
was known as "Quayle's brain". Not much to do there, then. He
organized the formation of the Project for the New American
Century, of which he is chairman, on behalf of the Bradley
Foundation. With this background, no wonder he is a political
'pundit' on Murdoch's Fox/Fix News.
He is chairman of the New
Citizenship Project that connects with the Project for the New
American Century. It claims to be a non-profit, "educational"
organization promoting American global leadership.
Kristol told the BBC:
"American power should not just
be used in defense of American interests, but for the
promotion of American principles ... we are going to have to
bring down a series of regimes who are sponsors of a network
of various terrorist organizations."
62
He names them as Iran, Syria, Libya,
Saudi Arabia, Egypt and North Korea was this not a tyranny to
expand the control of America?
"No", said Kristol, "lli1J about
freedom and democracy, not about capitalism." "No", said
Icke, it is about global conquest for the Hidden Hand.
Kristol, like Perle, says that their ideological poodle in
London, Tony Blair, is a "kind of neo-conservative".
63
Kind of??
Kristol said the mass killing in
Iraq was "the end of the beginning of this part of the war, it
is not the end of the end".64
They would give Iraq a new
government "and then really work to remove other dictators with
weapons of mass destruction". The neo-cons - neo-Nazis - say that
democracies (tyrannies in which you can cast a meaningless vote)
don't harbor international terrorists. But what about the White
House and Downing Street for a start?
Kristol runs the Rupert
Murdoch-financed Weekly Standard in Washington, five floors
below the American Enterprise Institute. The publication
slavishly supports the Bush and Israel line. A regular
contributor to the paper is John Bolton, the Iraq war
manipulator, who loves to attack UN Secretary General Kofi
Annan.
Others include Perle, Wolfowitz, Feith and Woolsey.
In 1998, it was Kristol, Bolton,
Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Khalilzad, Bennett, Woolsey, Perle and
current Deputy Secretary of State, Richard Armitage, who signed
a letter calling on President Bill Clinton to instigate military
action in Iraq.66 What a
bunch these are and they are "running our world on behalf of
forces we never see." Kristol is very close to Vice President
Cheney and is at the heart of the agenda with regard to the Bush
government. In that case it doesn't look good either for Saudi
Arabia or Egypt.
Reporting an interview with Kristol,
the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, said:
"... his opinion is that it is
impossible to let Saudi Arabia just continue what\ it is
doing. It is impossible to accept the anti-Americanism it is
disseminating. The fanatic Wahhabism that Saudi Arabia
engenders is undermining the stability of the entire region.
It's the same with Egypt, he says: we mustn't accept the
status quo there. For Egypt, too, the horizon has to be
liberal democracy." 67
Richard Perle, one of Defense
Secretary Rumsfeld's closest advisers and a vocal advocate of
war against Iraq, has also publicly questioned the "reliability"
(we intend to invade) of long-time US ally, Saudi Arabia.68
As I said in Alice in Wonderland and
the World Trade Center Disaster, Saudi Arabia has long been a
puppet state of the US, but I felt there were plans to move in
eventually and take complete control, as with Iraq. While I was
writing this chapter, the United States announced it was withdrawing
most of its troops from Saudi Arabia.
You can bet this is part of a strategy
that will include the demonization of Saudi Arabia and the return of
the troops to take over the country and its oil. As per usual,
terrorist bombs exploded in Saudi Arabia killing many people just
before Colin Powell was due to arrive, providing the backdrop of
devastation that he could exploit with his 'war on terror'
propaganda.
In the predictable style of
manipulators, William Kristol seeks to present everything as black
and white. You are either with us or for the terrorists, and so on.
He told Haaretz that the choice was between "extremist Islam,
secular fascism or democracy", and because of September 11th he
said, "Americans understood that".
No, America has been told that over and
over by people like Kristol since those planes struck the twin
towers.
"America is in a position where it
has no choice", Kristol ludicrously said. "It is obliged to be
far more aggressive in promoting democracy, hence this war."
For "democracy" read "American control".
He claimed that this policy was based on the new American
understanding that if the United States does not shape the world in
its image, the world will shape the United States in its own image.
Once again we see that the whole
foundation for the justification of this fascist expansionism of the
Fourth Reich is believing the official story of the attacks that
happened on September 11th to be true. But it is not; the official
story is a lie. Who told us what happened, who did it, how they did
it, and why?
The same forces that are using their
false version of the story to follow their long-planned agenda for
global conquest.
Charles Krauthammer, a columnist for the
Washington Post, Time, and Kristol's Weekly
Standard, is close to the Project for the New American
Century and he took the same line in his interview with Haaretz:
" ... the sea-change ... took place
here on September 11, 2001. Since that morning, Americans have
understood that if they don't act now. and if weapons of mass
destruction reach extremist terrorist organizations, millions of
Americans will die. Therefore, because they understand that
those others want to kill them by the millions, the Americans
prefer to take to the field of battle and fight, rather than sit
idly by and die at home." 69
The familiar technique of frightening
the people into acquiescence is all based on the acceptance that the
official story of 9 /11 is what really happened. The situation is
presented as open and shut, black and white, no middle ground, no
room for debate. As always, there is the "Americans have
understood", "Americans know", when the truth is that is simply what
people like Krauthammer, Kristol, Murdoch, Perle, Rumsfeld, Powell,
Cheney and Bush have told them.
The New York Times columnist,
Thomas Friedman, said:
"Is the Iraq war the great
neoconservative war? It's "the war the neoconservatives wanted."
It's the war the neoconservatives marketed. Those people had an
idea to sell when September 11th came, and they sold it. Oh boy,
did they sell it. So this is not a war that the masses demanded.
This is a war of an elite. I could give you the names of 25
people (all of whom are at this moment within a five-block
radius of this office) who, if you had exiled them to a desert
island a year and a half ago, the Iraq war would not have
happened."70
Khalid Saffuri of the Islamic
Institute said of the nee-con cabal:
"They are a disaster for this
country and many members of Congress believe that, but they
don't dare say it. They'll take on everyone, it's like a gang,
you know, it's like a Mafia." 71
Syria's deputy US ambassador, Imad
Moustapha said:
"Sometimes they are really
terrifying in way they think, the way they would like to shape
the world, the way they can impose their doctrine on everyone
else, even if force is needed." 72
Moustapha said he was not worried about
them implementing their policies because of Syria’s friends and
allies. Oh, Imad. Look again, mate. A former US ambassador and White
House aide said:
"This bunch of interlopers who've
latched on to George are stark, staring bonkers. Their policies
are insane." 73
And Arthur Schlesinger, the
historian and former special assistant to President Kennedy, also
referred to them as "lunatics":
"They lack any decent respect for
the opinions of the rest of mankind; and cast themselves as the
world's jury, judge and executioner in deciding which country to
attack, which people to bomb." 74
SOURCES
1 "USA: Unocal Advisor Named
Representative to Afghanistan-. World Socialist Web Site,
January 3rd 2002
2 Ted Rail, author of To Afghanistan
and Back, recounting his experiences covering the Afghan war,
http://www.altemet.org.tprint.html?StoryID:12205
3 "Berating the Generals, The Siege
of Washington", by Wayne Madsen, a Washington, DC-based
investigative journalist. GounterPunch, March 31st 2003,
http://www.counterpunch.org.tmadsen03312003.html
4 "The Next World Order, The Bush Administration may have a
brand-new doctrine of power', New Yorker, April 1st 2002
5 http://www.newamericancentury.org,tRebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
6 "Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President".
by Neil Mackay. Sunday Herald, http://www.Sundayherald.com/27735
7 Ibid
8 "I asked my intelligence source why Blair misled us allover
Saddam's WMD, His response? One word ... Campbell", by Andrew
Gilligan, Mail on Sunday, June 1st 2003
9 BBG News Online, July 6th 2003
10 http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0307/S00165.htm
11 "I asked my intelligence source
why Blair misled us allover Saddam's WMD, His response? One word
.. , Campbell", by Andrew Gilligan, Mail on Sunday. June 1st
2003
12 Ibid
13 Sunday Telegraph, June 1st 2003
14 "Short Blasts The Secret War
Deal", Daily Mall, June 2nd 2003, p 6
15 Ibid
16 Adolf Hitler, Mein KampfiHoughton
Mifflin Company published an edition in 1999)
17
http://www.af.mil/news/airman/ll01/hawk.html
18 "CIA Investigator Debunks, Niger
Uranium Sales To Iraq', Rense,com, July 6th 2003, http://rense.com/generaI38/
urn. htm
19 CNN March 15th 2003
20 "No evidence of plan to use
banned weapons In war", by George Edmonson in Washington Sydney
Morning Herald, May 9th 2003
21 The Guardian, April 16th 2003
22 WMD emphasis was 'bureaucratic',
May 29th 2003
23 http://news.bbc.co.uk/l/hi/world/americas/2966639.stm
April 22nd 2003
24 "US Should Be 'Embarrassed' Over
Failure to Find WMDs: Ex-Spies", Agence France Presse, April
18th 2003
25 "Wayne Madsen - Berating the
Generals, The Siege of Washington", CounterPunch, March 31st
2003, http://www.counterpunch.org/madsen03312003.html
26 Ibid
27 Ibid
28 Ibid
29 Joseph A. Schumpeter. The
Sociology of Imperialism, 1918
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/Excerpts_Sideshow.html
30 "Bush planned Iraq 'regime
change' before becoming President", by Neil Mackay, Sunday
Herald, http://www.Sundayherald.com/27735
31 Ibid
32 Ibid
33 http://www.
newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses. pdf
34 "Bush planned Iraq 'regime
change' before becoming President", by Neil Mackay, Sunday
Herald, http://www.Sundayherald.com/27735
35 The Biggest Secret. Bridge of
Love Publications. 1998
36 "America Pearl Harbored",
American Free Press, http://www.americanfreepress.net/ 12_24_02/
America_Pearl_Harbored/ america_pearl_harbored.html
37 "Carving Up The New Iraq", by
Neil Mackay, Sunday Herald. Scotland,
http://www.Sundayherald.com/33021
38 Panorama, BBCl, May 18th 2003
39 Ibid
40 This background was published in
an investigation headed Carving Up The New Iraq, by Neil Mackay.
Sunday Herald, Scotland, http://www.Sundayherald.com/33021
41 Panorama, BBC1, May 18th 2003
42 "An American Odyssey, Part One",
by Graham Turner, Daily Telegraph, June 16th 2003, pp 13-15
43 Panorama, BBC1, May 18th 2003
44 "Report: Pentagon consultant
using connections for private investing", Associated Press, May
7th 2003
45 Ibid
46 Ibid
47 Panorama. May 18th, BBC-1
48 Panorama, BBC1, May 18th, 2003
49 "Good Americans", by John Judge,
December 17th, 2002, http:// mke. indymedia.org/front.php3?article
_id=1609
50 Ibid
51 Panorama. BBC1, May 18th, 2003
52 Ibid
53 Ibid
54 Ibid
55 Ibid
56 Ibid
57 "An American Odyssey". Part One.
by Graham Turner. Daily Telegraph. Jure' e 16:h 2003. JJ 13-1511
58 "The Weird Men Behind George W. Bush's War". by 1'v1lchael
lind. New Statt;r'sman. Londor;. April 12th 2003
59 "A strange case of Jared Israel".
by Israel Shamir. October 3rd 2002. ~ http://www.israelshamir.net/english/
strange.shtm
60 Panorama, BBC-1, May 18th 2003
61 Ibid
62 Ibid
63 Ibid
64 Ibid
65 Ibid
66 "Carving Up The New Iraq". by
Neil Mackay. Sunday Herald. Scotland.
http://www.Sundayherald.com/33021
67 "White Man's Burden", by Ari
Shavit. Haaretz ne,~spaper http://www.haaretzdaily.com/ hasen/
pages /ShArt.jhtml?item No=2802 79&contrass I D=2&subContrassl
D= 14&sbSu b ContrassID=O&listSrc= Y
68 "Report: Pentagon consultant
using connections 'or private Investing". 4ssoCiated Press. May
7th 2003
69 "White Man's Burden". by Ari
Shavit. Haaretz nevvspaper http://www.haaretzdaily.com/ hasen/
pages /ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=2802 79&contrassl D=2&subContrassl D=
14&sbSub ContrassID=O&listSrc=Y
70 Ibid
71 Panorama. BBC-l May 18th, 2003
72 Ibid
73 "An American Odyssey, Part One'.
by Graham Turner. Daily Telegraph. June 16th 2003. pp 13-15
74 Ibid
Back to
Contents
Back to Germany's ET Contacts?
|